Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› recsys-artifact-evaluation
recsys-artifact-evaluation
GitHub用于为RecSys论文打包匿名代码仓库，涵盖数据集、模型及评估脚本。确保排名结果可复现，规范去匿名化流程，并针对Top-N、反事实推断等场景提供审查重点与打包指南，提升论文可信度。
Trigger Scenarios
需要为RecSys论文准备匿名提交材料
构建可复现的推荐系统评估环境
处理反事实或离策略评估的数据日志
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill recsys-artifact-evaluation -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "recsys-artifact-evaluation",
"description": "Use when packaging ACM RecSys code, datasets, splits, trained models, propensity logs, and seeds as an anonymous in-paper repository during review or a public archive after acceptance, even though RecSys has no separate artifact badge — covering what recommender reviewers open first and how to make a top-N ranking table regenerable end to end."
}
RecSys Artifact Evaluation
Use this for evidence packaging around RecSys. The venue does not run a separate artifact-badge process; instead the Call for Contributions expects a link to an anonymous repository inside the paper, and reproducibility-minded reviewers judge the paper partly by whether that repository makes the ranking claims regenerable.
Artifact plan
- Decide what a reviewer needs to trust the claim: the exact dataset version, the split script, baseline configurations, tuning grids, trained-model checkpoints, exposure/propensity logs for off-policy claims, seeds, and the evaluation code.
- Keep decision-critical evidence in the paper or appendix; optional run files live in the repository, because RecSys reviewers are not obliged to open it.
- Anonymize repository history, commit authors, cluster paths, license headers, and any platform or organization names.
- Include a one-minute reproduction map: environment, dependencies, dataset download or identifier, commands, expected ranking numbers, runtime, seeds, and known nondeterminism.
- For proprietary interaction data, give enough provenance and preprocessing detail for credible reproduction on a public dataset without violating data-use terms.
- After acceptance, swap the anonymous mirror for a public, licensed, citable archive.
What RecSys evidence reviewers open first
| Claim type | First artifact inspected | Common failure caught |
|---|---|---|
| Top-N ranking gain | Split script + baseline configs | Random split leaking the future; baselines under-tuned |
| Off-policy / counterfactual result | Logged propensities + estimator code | Propensities missing, so the IPS/DR estimate cannot be recomputed |
| Sequential/session model | Data ordering + leave-one-last split | Test interactions seen during training |
| Reported metric values | The scorer and its cutoff | Sampled metrics presented as full-ranking numbers |
Because RecSys reviewers can and do re-run a small offline pipeline, make the headline ranking table regenerable with one command before polishing anything else.
Worked vignette: packaging an off-policy study
A hypothetical submission proposes an exposure-corrected ranker validated offline and in a semi-synthetic simulator.
- Ship the logging policy's propensities alongside the interactions, not just the clicks, so the inverse-propensity estimate can be recomputed.
- Provide the simulator as one parameterized script so a reviewer can vary exposure strength and reward, rather than trusting a single frozen curve.
- Emit every ranking and reward table directly from logged results so the PDF numbers and the repository numbers cannot drift apart.
- State which regime the simulator satisfies the positivity assumption in and where it breaks it, since that mapping is what reproducibility-minded reviewers grade.
Calibration anchors
repo/
README.md # one-minute orientation: env, data id, one command per table
environment.yml # pinned versions of the recommender framework and deps
data/PREP.md # dataset version, split protocol (temporal), checksums
configs/ # per-model + per-baseline configs with tuning grids
run_tables.sh # regenerates Table 1..N from seeds
- Assume only the README and one entry script get opened; design for that.
- Repository size limits and accepted hosting change by cycle; verify against the current submission instructions rather than a past year.
Output format
[Artifact role] anonymous in-paper repo / camera-ready public archive
[Contents] <data/splits/configs/checkpoints/propensities/seeds>
[Anonymity risks] <paths / commit authors / platform names / URLs>
[Reproduction level] turnkey / scripted / descriptive / weak
[Fixes before upload] <ordered list>
Version History
- 9f86f09 Current 2026-07-19 17:28
