smj-workflow
GitHubSMJ投稿路由技能，根据稿件状态推荐下一步专用技能。涵盖选题、理论、方法、数据、贡献、图表、写作、提交及回复审稿意见等阶段，确保策略期刊投稿流程有序进行。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill smj-workflow -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "smj-workflow",
"description": "Use when deciding which smj-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills."
}
Strategic Management Journal Workflow (smj-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It does not do the work of any specialized skill — it tells you which smj- skill to use right now* given where your manuscript stands.
Default assumption: unless you say otherwise, the target is the Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) — the flagship strategy journal published by Wiley for the Strategic Management Society (SMS), founded 1980 and led by four Co-Editors (current slate, pinned 2026-06-23: Agarwal, Benner, Gaba, and Silverman; roster rotates, so verify the live SMS masthead). SMJ wants a clear contribution to strategy theory (firm performance, competitive advantage) backed by rigorous, identification-aware empirics. It is highly selective (third-party estimates ~7% acceptance — UNVERIFIED), uses double-blind review, and requires two abstracts (research summary + managerial summary, ≤125 words each), five keywords, and APA references within a ~40-page budget. Generic "management" framing and unaddressed endogeneity are the two fastest paths to rejection. If the paper's engine is entrepreneurship or internationalization, the SMS siblings SEJ or GSJ may fit better than SMJ.
When to trigger
- "What should I do next?" on an SMJ-targeted paper
- You have a draft and need to find the binding constraint
- You keep bouncing between theory, methods, and writing without a plan
- You received SMJ reviewer comments and need to switch into revision mode
Routing table
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Idea is vague; unsure it is a strategy question (performance / advantage) | smj-topic-selection |
| Hypotheses are atheoretical or read as "predictions," not theory | smj-theory-development |
| Lit review is a list; no positioning against the strategy conversation | smj-literature-positioning |
| Design unclear: sample, unit of analysis, measures, identification | smj-methods |
| Performance regression with no endogeneity / reverse-causality fix | smj-data-analysis |
| Reviewers may ask "so what for strategy?"; contribution is thin | smj-contribution-framing |
| Too many tables; exhibits not self-contained; no path/effect figure | smj-tables-figures |
| Prose is jargon-heavy, hedged, or buries the argument | smj-writing-style |
| Ready to submit; need preflight (dual abstracts, 5 keywords, APA, format) | smj-submission |
| Want to understand the review timeline / action-editor process | smj-review-process |
| Received an R&R; need a response strategy and letter | smj-rebuttal |
Default order
smj-topic-selection— lock the strategy question (performance / competitive advantage)smj-theory-development— build the theoretical mechanism and hypothesessmj-literature-positioning— position against the live strategy conversationsmj-methods— sample, unit of analysis, measures, identification designsmj-data-analysis— estimate, and explicitly defeat endogeneity / selection / reverse causalitysmj-contribution-framing— sharpen the contribution to strategy theorysmj-tables-figures— finalize self-contained exhibitssmj-writing-style— full-draft polish (do this late)smj-submission— preflight (dual abstracts, 5 keywords, APA, page budget, anonymization)smj-review-process— understand what happens after submission (Co-Editor screen → action editor)smj-rebuttal— after the R&R decision
smj-writing-styleis a late-stage polish. Do not polish prose while the identification strategy or the theoretical contribution is still unsettled.
Decision heuristics
- "I have data but no strategy story" →
smj-topic-selection - "My hypotheses are just signed correlations" →
smj-theory-development - "My intro never names whose conversation I'm joining" →
smj-literature-positioning - "My DV is firm performance and my X is a strategic choice" →
smj-data-analysis(selection into the choice is the #1 threat) - "A reviewer could say 'this is management, not strategy'" →
smj-contribution-framing - "I have nine tables" →
smj-tables-figures - "I submit tomorrow" →
smj-submission - "I got a Major Revision" →
smj-review-processthensmj-rebuttal
Stage-gate triage
Run the gates top to bottom; the first FAIL names the skill to invoke today. Do not skip ahead — a later gate passed on top of an earlier failure is wasted polish.
SMJ stage-gate triage — first FAIL wins
GATE 1 Strategy DV dependent construct ties to firm performance
or competitive advantage? FAIL → smj-topic-selection
GATE 2 Mechanism each hypothesis states WHY, not just a sign? FAIL → smj-theory-development
GATE 3 Conversation intro names the strategy debate it joins? FAIL → smj-literature-positioning
GATE 4 Design unit of analysis, sample, measures,
identification plan all fixed? FAIL → smj-methods
GATE 5 Endogeneity selection into the strategic choice and
reverse causality explicitly defeated? FAIL → smj-data-analysis
GATE 6 So-what contribution to strategy theory statable
in two sentences? FAIL → smj-contribution-framing
GATE 7 Exhibits every table self-contained; a path/effect
figure carries the argument? FAIL → smj-tables-figures
GATE 8 Prose argument visible on a skim; hedging and
jargon trimmed? FAIL → smj-writing-style
GATE 9 Preflight two abstracts (research + managerial,
<=125 words each), 5 keywords, APA refs,
~40-page budget, anonymized for
double-blind review? FAIL → smj-submission
ALL PASS → submit; then smj-review-process, and smj-rebuttal when the decision arrives
Differences vs. AMJ / ASQ / AMR stacks
If the paper's center of gravity is general organizational behavior, HRM, or micro-OB, the Academy of Management Journal stack fits better. If the contribution is purely conceptual with no data, use an AMR theory-only stack. SMJ's distinctive bar: the dependent construct should connect to firm performance or competitive advantage, and the empirics must survive an endogeneity interrogation.
Anti-patterns
- Do not skip
smj-theory-developmentand jump to estimation — SMJ reviewers read theory first. - Do not let
smj-tables-figurespolish exhibits before the identification strategy holds. - Do not let
smj-rebuttaldraft a response letter before you have actually revised the manuscript. - Do not treat this as a generic management workflow; every stage must reconnect to strategy.
- Do not forget SMJ's dual-abstract / 5-keyword / APA requirements until submission day, or route an SEJ/GSJ-shaped paper to SMJ.
Templates & resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— SMJ scope, Co-Editors, dual-abstract/keyword/reference rules, and the SMS journal family../../resources/external_tools.md— strategy data sources and analysis packages across the pipeline
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 14:28
