Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› ylj-topic-selection
ylj-topic-selection
GitHub评估法律学术选题是否适合耶鲁法律评论，测试通用重要性、时效性和新颖性潜力，并确定文章类型。
Trigger Scenarios
判断选题是否适合耶鲁法律评论而非专业期刊
在多个候选角度中选择覆盖面最广的一个
决定文章类型为Article、Essay或Forum
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ylj-topic-selection -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "ylj-topic-selection",
"description": "Use when deciding whether a legal-scholarship idea is a fit for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) and which track it belongs in. It tests generalist significance, timeliness, and novelty potential; it does not draft the thesis or run the formal preemption search."
}
Topic Selection & Fit (ylj-topic-selection)
YLJ is the generalist flagship of American legal scholarship — read across the whole discipline by
academics, judges, and practitioners. A topic earns a slot only if its claim matters beyond a single
doctrinal niche. This skill screens the idea before you invest in a full draft; it does not yet build
the claim (ylj-thesis-and-contribution) or prove novelty (ylj-preemption-check).
When to trigger
- You have an idea and want to know if YLJ is the right home (vs. a specialty review)
- Several candidate angles exist and you must pick the one with the widest reach
- Deciding Article vs. Essay vs. Feature vs. (for Yale students) Note/Comment
- A timely development (new statute, circuit split, landmark opinion) might justify the Forum
Fit test (a topic must clear all four)
- Generalist stakes. A constitutional-law professor and a commercial-litigation partner can both say in one sentence why the claim matters. If only specialists in your subfield care, target a specialty review instead.
- A claim, not a survey. YLJ wants an argument that changes how readers think about a doctrine, theory, or institution — not a doctrinal literature review or a casenote.
- Headroom for novelty. A first scan (Westlaw secondary sources, SSRN, HeinOnline) suggests the
space is not already occupied. Confirm later with
ylj-preemption-check. - Right scale for a track. Big original theory → Article; sharp, contained intervention → Essay; timely reaction to a development or a response to a YLJ piece → Forum.
Fit-gate ledger
Before sending the user onward, write a short keep / reframe / reject ledger. This prevents generic "top law review" advice from passing as a YLJ fit decision.
| Gate | Pass evidence | If weak |
|---|---|---|
| Audience travel | Name two legal audiences outside the subfield and the reason each should care | Reframe the stakes or route to a specialty review |
| Claim pressure | State the contestable move, not just the topic | Route to ylj-thesis-and-contribution before picking a venue |
| Novelty headroom | Identify the first SSRN / Westlaw / HeinOnline scan and the closest near-miss | Route to ylj-preemption-check before investing in the draft |
| Track fit | Match ambition, timeliness, and length to Article / Essay / Forum / Note / Comment | Split or compress the idea before submission planning |
Use KEEP only when all four gates have concrete evidence. Use REFRAME when the idea could become YLJ-shaped after narrowing, broadening, or changing tracks. Use REJECT when the only plausible value is specialist, descriptive, or already preempted.
Generalist-significance ladder (push the topic up a rung)
| Rung | Example framing | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Doctrinal fix in one circuit | "The Ninth Circuit misreads § X" | Specialty review, not YLJ |
| Doctrine-wide problem | "Courts across circuits misframe X" | Borderline — needs a theory |
| Doctrine ↔ theory | "X reveals a flaw in how we think about Y" | YLJ Essay candidate |
| New framework for an institution | "A new account of how Y should work" | YLJ Article candidate |
Track sizing
- Article — original, ambitious scholarship; encouraged < 25,000 words incl. footnotes (~50 Journal pages) (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Essay — a pointed contribution; encouraged < 15,000 words incl. footnotes (~30 pages).
- Feature — curated set / symposium; coordinate with editors via
ylj-placement-strategy. - Note / Comment — Yale Law students only; route to
ylj-student-editor-reviewfor the Notes Development process and the first-time word caps. - Forum — short, timely online piece, encouraged < 10,000 words incl. footnotes (~20 pages).
Checklist
- One-sentence statement of why a generalist reader cares
- The idea is a claim that changes a reader's mind, not a summary
- Quick scan suggests novelty headroom (formal check deferred to preemption)
- Timeliness assessed — is this an Article (durable) or a Forum (time-sensitive)?
- Track chosen and its encouraged length is realistic for the idea
Anti-patterns
- Pitching a casenote, doctrinal survey, or student-seminar paper as a generalist Article
- Choosing a topic so timely it will be stale by the print cycle (that is a Forum piece)
- Picking a niche only specialists value, then hoping prestige carries it
- Ignoring that an over-length manuscript weighs against acceptance regardless of quality
Output format
【Topic】one line
【Generalist stakes】who outside the subfield cares, and why
【Fit gate】KEEP / REFRAME / REJECT + weakest gate
【Track】Article / Essay / Feature / Note / Comment / Forum (length realistic? Y/N)
【Novelty headroom】initial read (formal check pending)
【Next】ylj-thesis-and-contribution to sharpen the claim
Supplementary resources
../../resources/exemplars/library.md— landmark YLJ pieces by type, for calibrating ambition../../resources/official-source-map.md— official YLJ track/length facts
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 14:33
