jmr-topic-selection
GitHub用于评估营销选题是否契合JMR期刊。通过严谨性和实质性双重标准，判断研究是否具备方法学深度及营销洞察，并协助区分JM、Marketing Science等姊妹期刊的定位差异。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmr-topic-selection -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "jmr-topic-selection",
"description": "Use when testing whether a marketing question is a fit for the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) — a methods-\/modeling-forward AMA flagship — rather than the managerial Journal of Marketing, the analytical Marketing Science, or the consumer-theory JCR. Locks a question that can clear both JMR's rigor bar and its substantive-contribution bar."
}
Topic Selection & JMR Fit (jmr-topic-selection)
When to trigger
- You have a marketing idea but are unsure JMR is the right AMA/marketing venue
- A finding is managerially interesting but you are unsure it advances research
- You cannot tell whether the paper is behavioral, modeling/econometric, or methods
- A coauthor says "this might be a JM paper" or "this is really Marketing Science"
The JMR fit test
JMR publishes the full spectrum of marketing topics with an emphasis on methodological rigor and welcomes a wide variety of data and methodological approaches. Fit at JMR is a dual test, not a topic test:
- Rigor bar — Can the design credibly support the claim? (clean experimental identification, a defensible causal/econometric strategy, or a well-identified structural model.)
- Substance bar — Do marketing researchers learn something — a new substantive insight about consumers, markets, or marketing actions, or a usable methodological advance? A flawless null with no insight does not clear it.
A JMR-fit topic clears both. A topic that is only managerially compelling but methodologically thin belongs at Journal of Marketing; a topic that is only a clever model with no marketing payoff belongs at Marketing Science.
Classify the genre early
| Genre | Center of gravity | Typical JMR home |
|---|---|---|
| Behavioral | Lab/field experiments, consumer psychology, process tests | Yes |
| Modeling / econometric | Choice models, structural demand, causal field data | Yes |
| Methods contribution | A new estimator, measure, or research procedure | Yes |
The genre sets which downstream skills do the heavy lifting (jmr-methods, jmr-data-analysis).
Sister-journal triage
- Journal of Marketing (JM) — manager-facing, substantive framing; lighter on method. If the lead is "what should managers do," consider JM.
- Marketing Science — analytical/structural quantitative marketing; if the contribution is the model itself with no broad marketing-research insight, it may fit there.
- Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) — deep consumer-behavior theory, interdisciplinary; if the payoff is a consumer-psychology theory rather than a method-credible marketing finding, consider JCR.
Pre-commitment checks
- A one-sentence research question naming the marketing phenomenon and the unit (consumer, firm, market).
- A stated genre and the matching identification/estimation plan.
- An explicit "what we learn" sentence — substantive, methodological, or both.
- Feasible data/stimuli that can survive the exact-statistics mandate (p-values to three digits, SEs, effect sizes) and replication disclosure.
Pitch stress-test: one rewrite, both bars
Managerial-only pitch (JM signal): "We show retailers can lift loyalty-program enrollment with default-framed sign-up prompts."
JMR-ready pitch: "Across preregistered field experiments with a retail partner, we identify when default-framed enrollment prompts raise sign-ups, show the effect reverses under high perceived monitoring, and offer a process account that revises what choice-architecture work predicts for opt-in marketing programs."
The rewrite clears both bars in one breath: the rigor bar is stated up front (preregistered field experiments, a reversal that disciplines the process story) and the substance bar is explicit (a boundary condition plus a revised prediction — something marketing researchers learn, not just an effect size a manager could deploy). If your best one-sentence pitch cannot be rewritten this way, the genre or the venue is wrong.
Anti-patterns
- Choosing a topic on managerial appeal alone (a JM signal, not JMR).
- A method showcase with no marketing payoff (a Marketing Science risk).
- Picking a question whose data can never support credible identification.
- Deferring the genre decision until methods — it should be set now.
Output format
[Target] JMR
[Question] one sentence
[Genre] behavioral / modeling-econometric / methods
[Rigor bar] can the design support the claim? ...
[Substance bar] what do researchers learn? ...
[Sister-journal risk] JM / Marketing Science / JCR → answer
[Next skill] jmr-theory-development
Resources
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 13:49
