Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› amann-submission
amann-submission
GitHub用于管理学会《Annals》期刊投稿前的最终预检，涵盖提案与受邀全文两种路径的格式、匿名性及截止日期核对。旨在确保文件符合Manuscript Central门户要求，不生成内容。
Trigger Scenarios
临近截止日期需上传提案至Manuscript Central前
提案被接受后提交受邀全文评审时
确认不同投稿路径下的格式、CV及匿名性要求
不确定门户对提案或全文所需的具体文件
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-submission -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "amann-submission",
"description": "Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content."
}
Submission Preflight (amann-submission)
When to trigger
- A deadline is near — last check before uploading a proposal to Manuscript Central
- A proposal was accepted and you are submitting the invited full review
- Confirming format, CV, and anonymity requirements for the right route
- Unsure which files the portal expects for a proposal vs. a full review
Process facts (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准 — re-confirm on the AOM/Annals pages)
- Publisher / venue. Annals is the Academy of Management's review-of-the-field journal, published with Taylor & Francis. It is distinct from AMR (original theory) and AMJ (empirical). Submission is via Manuscript Central:
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aomannals. - Two routes, in order. (1) Proposal — the mandatory gate: ≤5 pages, single-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12pt, with the four headings (Focus of the review / Related reviews / Review scope and process / New insights); references and visuals do not count. (2) Invited full review — submitted only after a proposal is accepted; typically ~50 pages of text plus tables/figures/refs.
- Deadlines. Proposals are on a twice-yearly cycle — April 1 and October 1; not reviewed until the deadline passes; decisions ~6 weeks after the deadline. Two issues publish per year (January and July).
- Anonymity. Proposals are double-blind (reviewed by the Associate Editors) — anonymize the proposal. The invited full review forgoes double-blind (read by the Associate Editor and Editor), so anonymity requirements differ between the two routes — confirm current rules on the portal.
- CV. A current CV may be required for the editors' eyes only (not seen by reviewers) — confirm at submission (待核实).
- Style / format. Follow the current Annals/Taylor & Francis author guidelines for manuscript format and references (house style 待核实 — confirm APA vs. other on the live page). Length, abstract, and exact formatting specifics are volatile.
- Fees / APC. Any submission fee or APC is volatile — re-confirm on the official pages; do not assert an amount.
Preflight checklist
Route & files
- Route chosen: proposal (≤5pp, four headings) or invited full review (after acceptance)
- Proposal uses the four required headings verbatim and meets the ≤5pp / single-spaced / 1-in / 12pt limit
- Targeting the correct April 1 / October 1 deadline
- Full review (if invited) within the expected ~50-page norm; tables/figures/refs prepared
Front matter
- Title, abstract (review-style — contribution to the field), and keywords present
- Author affiliations complete; CV prepared if required (editors-only)
Anonymity & declarations
- Proposal anonymized for double-blind review (proposal route)
- Full-review anonymity handled per current rules (it forgoes double-blind)
- Confirmed not under review elsewhere; AI not listed as an author
Volatile re-confirms
- Portal specifics, fee/APC, CV requirement, house style, anonymity — re-checked on AOM/Annals pages (检索于 2026-06)
Anti-patterns
- Uploading a full review without an accepted proposal — out of process at Annals
- A proposal that exceeds 5 pages or omits one of the four required headings
- Missing the April 1 / October 1 window because intake was assumed to be rolling
- Asserting a fee/APC or editor name from memory rather than the live page
- Failing to anonymize the proposal (it is double-blind) or mishandling the full-review anonymity difference
- A primary-paper abstract on a review submission
Output format
【Route】proposal (≤5pp, 4 headings) / invited full review (~50pp)
【Deadline】targeting April 1 / October 1? <which>
【Proposal headings】Focus / Related reviews / Scope & process / New insights present? Y/N
【Anonymity】proposal anonymized (double-blind); full-review rule confirmed? Y/N
【CV】prepared if required (editors-only)? Y/N
【Volatile re-confirms】portal / fee / style / anonymity checked on AOM page? Y/N
【Next step】submit via Manuscript Central → amann-review-process for what to expect
Supplementary resources
templates/checklist.md— submission self-checktemplates/manuscript_template.md— lightweight manuscript scaffold
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 12:13
