Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics
ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics
GitHub用于评估稿件是否适合IEEE TIE期刊，指导工业应用电子、驱动及控制类论文的重构与实验验证要求。提供范围匹配、硬件证据标准、避坑指南及与其他期刊的对比决策支持。
Trigger Scenarios
作者指定TIE并需进行适配性检查
需将方法论重构为具有硬件实验证据的工业应用成果
在TIE与电力电子、自动控制和机器人等期刊间做选择
需要了解TIE的实验验证门槛和拒稿启发式规则
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics",
"description": "Use when targeting IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (TIE) or deciding whether an industrial-application electronics, drives, or control manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the experimentally-validated industrial-application bar, hardware-evidence rigor, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics."
}
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics)
Journal positioning
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (TIE), published by the IEEE
Industrial Electronics Society, is a flagship venue for the application of
electronics, control, instrumentation, and computational intelligence to
industrial systems: motor drives and motion control, power-electronics
applications, industrial informatics and communication, mechatronics, fault
diagnosis and condition monitoring, and robotics for industry. The defining
expectation is a concrete advance demonstrated on a real industrial problem and
validated experimentally, not a pure theory paper or a converter-topology
study with no system-level industrial framing. Its scope is broader on the
application side than ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics, whose center of
gravity is the converter/topology itself. This skill is a fit /
venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current
official author information. Before submitting, re-check the live IEEE TIE author
guidance and submission system.
When to trigger
- The author names TIE for a drives, motion-control, industrial-informatics, mechatronics, or fault-diagnosis manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
- A contribution must be re-framed from "we propose a method" into an industrial-application advance with experimental hardware evidence.
- The author is choosing between TIE and
ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics,ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control, orieee-transactions-on-robotics. - The author needs TIE's experimental-validation bar and desk-reject heuristics.
Scope & topic fit
- Motor drives and electrical machines control: field-oriented and direct-torque control, sensorless drives, multiphase and fault-tolerant drives.
- Motion control and mechatronics: servo systems, precision positioning, vibration suppression, and actuator/sensor integration for industrial machines.
- Power-electronics applications at the system level: renewable interfaces, grid-tied inverters, EV powertrains — framed by the industrial use, not the topology alone.
- Industrial informatics and the industrial IoT: real-time communication, edge/embedded computation, digital twins, and Industry 4.0 system integration.
- Fault diagnosis, prognosis, and condition monitoring of drives, machines, and power-electronic systems, with measured or realistically emulated fault data.
- Computational intelligence (learning, fuzzy, evolutionary methods) deployed in an industrial control/diagnosis loop, evaluated against an industrial baseline.
Method & evidence bar
- Experimental validation is expected: a hardware prototype, test bench, or dSPACE/FPGA real-time implementation; simulation-only papers are a weak fit unless the contribution is explicitly a modeling/design framework with a strong rationale.
- Report the experimental setup completely: machine/converter ratings, switching frequency, controller hardware, sampling rate, and sensing, so results are reproducible.
- Benchmark against an established industrial method under matched operating conditions; quantify the improvement (efficiency, dynamic response, THD, ripple, accuracy).
- Demonstrate robustness to the realities of industrial operation: parameter variation, load disturbance, measurement noise, and transients — not only nominal steady state.
- Stability/convergence claims, where made, must be justified; for learning-based schemes, address generalization beyond the single rig.
- Position the advance against recent TIE-relevant literature, not a decade-old strawman.
Structure & house style
- IEEE double-column format; TIE publishes full Papers and shorter contributions — match the article type to the contribution and re-check current definitions and length policy on the live guide.
- The introduction motivates an industrial need and the gap in existing practice, then states the contribution; survey-style introductions without a sharp gap are discouraged.
- Figures are load-bearing: control block diagrams, experimental waveforms with labeled scales, and comparison plots against the baseline method.
- A clear experimental-results section is central; tables should summarize quantitative comparisons under defined operating points.
- Keep the theory proportionate to the application contribution; deep proofs that dwarf the industrial result suggest a control-theory venue instead.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the IEEE Author Center anchors, then cite the current TIE-specific page you checked. - Search the live site for "IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics information for authors" and follow the current ScholarOne/IEEE version.
- Re-check article types, page/length limits and any overlength/mandatory-page policy, and the IEEE double-column template.
- Confirm experimental-data, reproducibility, and any video/supplementary-material expectations.
- Re-check ORCID, competing-interests, funding, author-contribution, and AI-use disclosure requirements, and IEEE open-access options.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- The contribution is an industrial-application advance, not a generic method with no industrial framing.
- Results are validated on hardware / a real-time platform; the setup is reported reproducibly.
- The improvement is quantified against an established industrial baseline under matched conditions.
- Robustness to parameter variation, load/disturbance, and transients is demonstrated.
- Theory is proportionate to the application; the paper is not a pure-theory submission.
- Article type and length fit current TIE limits; figures and tables carry the experimental story.
Common desk-reject triggers
- Pure-theory or simulation-only paper with no experimental validation and no compelling reason.
- A converter-topology or power-stage study with no system-level industrial application framing.
- Incremental tweak to a known control/diagnosis scheme with marginal, unbenchmarked gains.
- A machine-learning paper using an industrial dataset as a label, with no deployment or industrial loop.
- Scope mismatch: control theory, communications, or signal processing with industry only as a keyword.
Re-routing decision
- Converter topology / power-stage design as the core →
ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics. - General control theory with provable guarantees as the contribution →
ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control/automatica. - Robotics for manipulation/locomotion as the central result →
ieee-transactions-on-robotics. - Signal/biosignal processing as the core →
ieee-transactions-on-signal-processing. - Antenna/EM or instrumentation-measurement focus →
ieee-transactions-on-antennas-and-propagationor a measurement venue.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest industrial-electronics subtopics>
[Application] <the industrial problem and the advance in one line>
[Method/evidence] <does the experimental validation clear TIE's hardware + benchmark bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Paper / shorter contribution
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / template / experimental-data / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 12:55
