Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› hrm-submission
hrm-submission
GitHub用于HRM期刊投稿前的最终预检，涵盖双盲匿名化、标题页分离、APA格式、数据声明及ORCID检查。确保稿件符合EIC的契合度与质量要求，避免拒稿。不生成内容，仅进行合规性核对。
Trigger Scenarios
明天要提交，最后检查一遍
不确定如何匿名化处理或标题页内容
确认APA格式、数据声明和ORCID无误
确保通过主编的初步筛选
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-submission -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "hrm-submission",
"description": "Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Human Resource Management (Wiley \"HRM\") manuscript via Wiley ScholarOne — double-blind anonymization, the title-page split, APA style, the data-availability statement, ORCID, and the dual-contribution check the EIC screens on. Final checks; it does not draft content."
}
Submission Preflight (hrm-submission)
When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last check before pressing submit on ScholarOne
- Unsure how to anonymize for double-blind review and what goes on the separate title page
- Confirming APA style, the data-availability statement, and ORCID are in order
- Making sure the manuscript will clear the EIC's fit-and-relevance screen, not just the rules
Process facts (source map refreshed 2026-06; re-confirm on the official Wiley author page)
- Human Resource Management is a Wiley journal (Online ISSN 1099-050X; Print ISSN 0090-4848). Submission is via Wiley ScholarOne / Manuscript Central (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Double-blind review: the manuscript must be anonymized (no author names, affiliations, self-identifying citations, or acknowledgments in the main file); author details go on a separate title page uploaded as a distinct file (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Editorial screen: the Editor-in-Chief determines whether a paper meets the quality and relevance bar before it is sent to review — papers without a clear scholarly advance and a practical implication are desk-rejected.
- References: APA style (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Data sharing: Wiley's data-availability policy applies; include an appropriate data-availability statement (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Editorial team: Co-Editors-in-Chief Fang Lee Cooke (Monash) and Shaun Pichler (Cal State Fullerton; co-EiC from Jan 2025) (verified 2026-06-22 via Wiley; re-verify before submission as the board rotates).
- Exact word/abstract limits, article-type list, ORCID requirement, and any APC / open-access options are 待核实 — confirm on the live author-guidelines page before submitting.
Preflight checklist
Anonymization & files (double-blind)
- Main manuscript fully anonymized: no names, affiliations, funding/acknowledgments, or revealing self-citations ("as we showed (Author, 2021)")
- Separate title page file with all authors, affiliations, ORCIDs, corresponding-author contact
- File names and document properties do not leak author identity
- Tables, figures, and any online supplement embedded/uploaded per ScholarOne rules
Style & structure
- APA references and in-text citations throughout; reference list complete and consistent
- Abstract within the journal's limit (待核实) and stating the dual contribution
- Theoretical-model figure matches the hypotheses; exhibits self-contained
- Level of analysis and constructs labeled consistently
- Word/page limit respected (待核实); heavy material moved to an online supplement if needed
Declarations & policy
- Data-availability statement prepared per Wiley policy
- Ethics / IRB approval and informed-consent statements where human-subjects data are used
- Conflict-of-interest and funding disclosures complete
- Confirmed the paper is not under review elsewhere; AI not listed as an author
The screen check (do this last)
- A reader of the abstract + intro can see both the scholarly advance and the workforce-policy / HRM-practice implication — this is what the EIC gates on
Anti-patterns
- Submitting a main file that still names the authors or affiliations (breaks double-blind)
- Treating the title page as part of the anonymized manuscript
- Non-APA references, or inconsistent in-text citation style
- Omitting the data-availability statement
- Submitting to HRM via the wrong portal/journal (confusing it with HRMJ, the UK journal)
- Ignoring the practice payoff and hoping the rigor alone clears the EIC screen
Output format
【Anonymization】main file clean + separate title page? [Y/N]
【Style】APA references + house style? [Y/N]
【Abstract/limits】within limit (待核实) + dual contribution stated? [Y/N]
【Data policy】availability statement prepared? [Y/N]
【Declarations】ethics / COI / funding complete? [Y/N]
【Screen check】scholarly advance AND practice payoff visible up front? [Y/N]
【Portal】Wiley ScholarOne (not HRMJ)? [Y/N]
【Next step】submit via ScholarOne → hrm-review-process for what to expect
Supplementary resources
templates/checklist.md— submission self-checktemplates/manuscript_template.md— lightweight manuscript scaffold../../resources/official-source-map.md— official Wiley URLs and volatile facts
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 13:18
