Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› jacs-supplementary
jacs-supplementary
GitHub用于组装JACS论文补充信息(SI)，确保数据完整可复现。涵盖实验细节、化合物表征、谱图、晶体学CIF及计算数据，明确主文与SI界限，提供核查清单以避免常见错误。
Trigger Scenarios
准备提交JACS稿件的补充信息
不确定哪些内容应放入SI而非正文
需要处理晶体结构CCDC沉积
审查者询问缺失的实验或谱图数据
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jacs-supplementary -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "jacs-supplementary",
"description": "Use when assembling the Supporting Information for a Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) manuscript — complete procedures, full compound characterization, copies of key spectra, and crystallographic CIFs\/CCDC numbers. Builds and audits the SI — it does not decide which experiments to run."
}
Supporting Information (jacs-supplementary)
When to trigger
- The main text is set and the SI must be assembled
- A reviewer could ask "where is the procedure / spectrum / CIF?"
- You are unsure what belongs in the SI vs the main text
- Crystal structures need depositing before submission
What the SI must contain
The SI is where JACS rigor is verified. It should let an independent chemist reproduce every result and confirm every structure.
General experimental
- Materials and sources; drying/purification of solvents and reagents
- Inert-atmosphere / glovebox conditions where relevant
- Instruments and conditions (NMR field/solvent reference, HRMS mode, IR mode, diffractometer, etc.)
- Safety/hazard notes for dangerous reagents or procedures
Per-compound (for every new compound)
- Full procedure — scale, equivalents, temperature, time, workup, purification; isolated yield
- Characterization block — ¹H, ¹³C{¹H} (+ heteronuclear as needed), HRMS (calcd/found), IR, mp/[α]D/UV-vis as appropriate
- Purity — EA (calcd vs found) or HPLC/GC trace
- Stereochemistry — chiral HPLC/GC/SFC traces (racemate + sample), dr determination
- Copies of key spectra — ¹H and ¹³C (and diagnostic 2D/heteronuclear) for each new compound, legible, labeled with compound number
Crystallography
- CIF deposited with CCDC; CCDC number cited in SI and text
- Crystal data and refinement table; checkCIF/PLATON report addressed
- Note disorder/restraints and how handled
Catalysis / mechanism support
- Control-experiment procedures and results
- Kinetics data, rate laws, KIE, labeling experiments with raw traces
- Computational details + optimized coordinates (xyz) and energies, if used
Data and code
- Data availability statement consistent with main text
- Raw-data location (FIDs, chromatograms, diffraction frames) if archived/deposited
- Computational input/output or scripts where appropriate
Main text vs SI
| Goes in main text | Goes in SI |
|---|---|
| The headline result, key scheme/figure | Full step-by-step procedures |
| Representative scope / mechanism figure | Complete characterization data per compound |
| One or two diagnostic spectra (if essential) | Copies of all spectra |
| Crystal-structure figure + CCDC # | Full crystal/refinement tables, checkCIF |
Checklist
- Every new compound has a procedure + characterization + spectra copies
- Every compound number in the SI matches the main text
- All CIFs deposited; CCDC numbers present and correct
- checkCIF alerts resolved or justified in the SI
- Chiral/purity traces included for stereochemical/purity claims
- Computational coordinates and details included if computation is used
- SI is paginated, with a table of contents, and self-consistent with the text
Anti-patterns
- "Characterization data available on request" — must be in the SI
- Spectra copies missing or illegible for some compounds
- CIF not deposited; CCDC number a placeholder
- SI compound numbering diverging from the main text
- Procedures missing scale/equivalents so yields can't be reproduced
- Computational claims with no coordinates
Operating pass for Journal of the American Chemical Society
Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the chemical novelty, characterization chain, controls, and scope or mechanism evidence; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: chemistry reviewers who expect a molecule/material/reaction claim to be supported by rigorous characterization and mechanistic insight.
- Do the pass: Return a claim-evidence-risk ledger rather than a prose-only diagnosis; every recommendation must point to a manuscript location or missing artifact.
- Return a ledger: give
claim / evidence / risk / manuscript locationrows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue. - Sibling guard: compare against ACS Central Science for broad conceptual reach, Angewandte for communication style, specialized ACS journals for narrower chemistry; if a sibling owns the contribution, recommend re-routing before polishing format.
- Stop condition: do not give submission-ready advice until the pack's
resources/official-source-map.mdhas been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.
Output format
【Compounds in SI】N; procedures complete [ ] / missing [...]
【Spectra copies】complete? Y/N — missing: [...]
【Purity/chiral traces】present? Y/N
【CCDC #】[...]; checkCIF addressed? Y/N
【Computation】coords + details included? Y/N / NA
【SI ↔ text consistency】Y/N
【Next】jacs-writing-style → jacs-submission
Related resources
../jacs-submission/templates/checklist.md— pre-submission self-check../../resources/external_tools.md— CCDC deposition, checkCIF/PLATON, NMR/computation tools
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 14:00
