Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› ieee-transactions-on-antennas-and-propagation
ieee-transactions-on-antennas-and-propagation
GitHub用于评估天线、电磁及波传播论文是否符合IEEE TAP期刊要求。提供选题定位、范围匹配、理论-仿真-测量证据链标准、排版风格及拒稿启发式规则，辅助作者进行投稿适配与重构。
Trigger Scenarios
确认论文是否适合TAP期刊
将设计重构以突出电磁贡献而非系统电路
判断超材料结果归属TAP或光学/材料期刊
了解TAP的测量验证标准及拒稿风险
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieee-transactions-on-antennas-and-propagation -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "ieee-transactions-on-antennas-and-propagation",
"description": "Use when targeting IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (TAP) or deciding whether an antennas, applied-electromagnetics, or wave-propagation manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the theory-plus-simulation-plus-measurement evidence bar, EM-contribution rigor, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics."
}
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (ieee-transactions-on-antennas-and-propagation)
Journal positioning
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (TAP), published by the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society, is a flagship archival venue for antennas, applied electromagnetics, and wave propagation: antenna design and analysis, electromagnetic theory, scattering and diffraction, computational EM, metamaterials and metasurfaces for EM, and propagation/channel characterization. The defining expectation is a genuine antenna or electromagnetics contribution supported by the field's standard evidence chain — sound theory or formulation, validating full-wave simulation, and, for most antenna papers, fabricated-prototype measurement. Papers whose real contribution is a circuit, a communications system, or an algorithm, with the antenna present only as a component, are a poor fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author information. Before submitting, re-check the live IEEE TAP author guidance and submission system.
When to trigger
- The author names TAP for an antenna, applied-EM, scattering, or propagation manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
- A design must be re-framed so the electromagnetic contribution — not the downstream system or circuit — is the headline.
- The author is unsure whether a metamaterial/metasurface result belongs in TAP (EM functionality) or an optics/materials venue.
- The author needs TAP's measurement-validation bar and desk-reject heuristics.
Scope & topic fit
- Antenna design and analysis: arrays, wideband/multiband, electrically small, reconfigurable, mm-wave/THz, on-chip and integrated antennas, with a new principle or performance advance.
- Electromagnetic theory and methods: analytical formulations, Green's functions, and computational EM (MoM, FEM, FDTD, FMM) when the contribution is the method or insight.
- Scattering, diffraction, and inverse scattering; radar cross-section; rough-surface and random-media interaction.
- Metamaterials, metasurfaces, frequency-selective surfaces, and engineered EM media when the advance is an electromagnetic functionality (not just a material).
- Wave propagation and channel modeling grounded in electromagnetics: terrestrial, indoor, ionospheric, and near-field propagation phenomena.
- Antenna measurement techniques, near-field/far-field transformation, and characterization methodology.
Method & evidence bar
- The standard evidence chain is theory/formulation → full-wave simulation → measurement; most antenna papers require a fabricated prototype with measured results, not simulation alone.
- Report simulation setup fully: solver, mesh/convergence, boundary conditions, and excitation — and reconcile measured vs. simulated results, explaining discrepancies.
- Measurements must include the relevant antenna metrics under stated conditions: S-parameters, realized gain/efficiency, radiation patterns (co/cross-pol), bandwidth.
- For theory/computational-EM papers, validate against canonical analytical solutions or reference results and quantify accuracy and cost.
- Benchmark against the closest prior antenna/EM designs on the metrics that matter (size, bandwidth, gain, efficiency, polarization), not a strawman.
- The electromagnetic mechanism (resonance, mode, surface-wave, coupling) must be explained, not just reported as a working geometry.
Structure & house style
- IEEE double-column format; TAP publishes full Papers and shorter Communications — match the article type to the contribution and re-check current definitions and length policy on the live guide.
- The introduction motivates the EM/antenna gap and states the contribution; avoid framing the paper around a communications-system application the antenna merely serves.
- Figures are load-bearing: geometry with dimensions, simulated/measured S-parameters, radiation patterns, current/field distributions illustrating the mechanism.
- Include a fabrication photo and the measurement configuration for prototype papers.
- Keep system/link-level material proportionate; the paper stands on its EM contribution.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the IEEE Author Center anchors, then cite the current TAP-specific page you checked. - Search the live site for "IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation information for authors" and follow the current ScholarOne/IEEE version.
- Re-check article types (Paper vs. Communication), page/length limits and overlength policy, and the IEEE double-column template.
- Confirm expectations on measurement data, simulation reproducibility, and any supplementary material.
- Re-check ORCID, competing-interests, funding, author-contribution, and AI-use disclosure requirements, and IEEE open-access options.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- The headline contribution is an antenna/electromagnetics advance, not a circuit, system, or algorithm.
- The evidence chain is complete: theory/formulation, full-wave simulation, and (for antennas) measured prototype.
- Measured and simulated results are reconciled, with discrepancies explained.
- The EM mechanism (mode/resonance/coupling) is explained, not just a working geometry shown.
- Performance is benchmarked against the closest prior designs on the right metrics.
- Article type (Paper vs. Communication) and length fit current TAP limits.
Common desk-reject triggers
- Antenna design with simulation only and no measurement, with no justifying reason.
- A circuit, RF front-end, or communications-system paper where the antenna/EM contribution is incidental.
- Incremental geometry variation with marginal, unbenchmarked improvement and no new EM insight.
- Computational-EM paper with no validation against canonical or reference solutions.
- Scope mismatch: a pure photonics/optics, pure materials, or pure signal-processing paper labeled "EM."
Re-routing decision
- Communications-system or link-level contribution as the core → an IEEE communications venue.
- Microwave circuits, filters, or active RF front-ends as the core →
ieee-transactions-on-microwave-theory-and-techniques. - Optical/photonic metasurface or device physics as the core →
optica. - Signal processing (beamforming, DOA, array processing) as the core →
ieee-transactions-on-signal-processing. - Materials-science advance of the metamaterial itself → a materials venue.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest antenna/EM subtopics>
[EM contribution] <the antenna/electromagnetics advance in one line>
[Method/evidence] <does theory + simulation + measurement clear TAP's validation bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Paper / Communication
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / template / measurement-data / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 12:55
