Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› aaag-topic-selection
aaag-topic-selection
GitHub用于评估选题是否符合《美国地理学家协会年鉴》标准，并确定其所属的四大领域之一。通过测试地理显著性和领域契合度，区分期刊定位，避免误投专业子刊或不符合地理理论要求的稿件。
Trigger Scenarios
决定选题是否适合投稿该期刊
被质疑缺乏地理学意义或范围过窄
不确定应归入哪个具体地理领域
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-topic-selection -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "aaag-topic-selection",
"description": "Use when deciding whether a topic fits the Annals of the American Association of Geographers and which of its four areas to target. Tests geographic significance and area fit; it does not design the study or write the paper."
}
Topic Selection & Area Fit (aaag-topic-selection)
The Annals is the AAG's broad four-area flagship. A topic earns a place by being geographic — space, place, scale, region, or spatial process is constitutive of the question — and by speaking to one of the journal's areas with enough reach that geographers outside that subfield see why it matters.
When to trigger
- Choosing a project, or deciding if a draft fits the Annals vs. a specialty venue
- A reviewer or colleague said "this isn't really geography" or "this is too narrow"
- Unsure whether to declare Geographic Methods, Human, Nature-Society, Physical, or General Geography
The two-part fit test
- Geographic-ness. Could you delete every spatial/place/scale element and keep the argument? If yes, it is not yet a geography paper — the geography must do theoretical work, not just locate data.
- Area reach. Within the declared area, would a geographer in a neighboring subfield see the stake? An over-narrow result that only its sub-sub-field cares about is an Annals off-fit.
Declare the area (it routes the paper and sets the bar)
| Area | Core of a strong topic | Off-fit signal |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic Methods | a method/model that improves geographic inference (spatial dependence, scale, MAUP, uncertainty) | a generic ML/stats trick with a coordinate column bolted on |
| Human Geography | a spatially/relationally theorized account of social process | a sociology/anthropology paper with a study-area map |
| Nature and Society | a coupled human-environment dynamic where both sides are theorized | one side asserted as backdrop to the other |
| Physical Geography, Earth & Environmental | an earth-surface/environmental process with geographic framing and earth-science rigor | a lab/RS result with no geographic question |
| General Geography | a contribution that reorders how all geographers see something | a paper that just won't pick an area |
Calibrating ambition (Annals vs. specialty venue)
- Specialty venue (e.g., IJGIS, Geomorphology, Environment and Planning D) when the audience is the sub-field and the advance is incremental within it.
- The Annals when the contribution is legible to the area broadly and connects to geographic theory or to a cross-cutting concern (scale, place, environment-society, spatial method).
- The cross-disciplinary/General track when the contribution genuinely spans areas.
Sibling-journal guard (do not mis-pitch)
- Progress in Human Geography — review/agenda essays, not original empirical studies.
- Geographical Analysis — formal spatial-analytic methods; the Annals Methods area is broader and more applied.
- Transactions of the IBG / The Professional Geographer — overlapping scope; the Annals is the AAG's broad flagship with the four-area structure.
Worked micro-example (illustrative)
A draft asks "what predicts urban tree-canopy loss in City X?" and maps the result by census tract.
Delete-test: remove the map and "tract" → "what predicts canopy loss?" survives → geography decorative
Repair: reframe around SCALE — does the predictor of loss change with the unit/scale of analysis, and
what does that imply for where canopy is added? Now space is the argument, not the backdrop.
Area: Nature and Society (canopy = environment-society) or Methods (if the scale claim leads)
Reach: a methods reader gets a MAUP/scale lesson; a nature-society reader gets an equity mechanism
The repaired version makes the geography load-bearing and gives a neighboring subfield a reason to read.
Checklist
- The geography is load-bearing (delete-test passes)
- One area declared, with a one-line reason it belongs there
- A neighboring-subfield geographer can state the stake in a sentence
- Right venue confirmed (Annals vs. a specialty journal)
- Article type chosen (Article / Forum / Commentary) — see
aaag-workflow
Anti-patterns
- "Spatial decoration" — coordinates or a study-area map standing in for a geographic argument
- Pitching a specialty-venue increment to the broad flagship
- Refusing to pick an area (the paper lands with the wrong editor and reviewers)
- A Nature-Society topic that theorizes only the social or only the biophysical side
Output format
【Area】Methods / Human / Nature-Society / Physical / General
【Geographic core】the space/place/scale/process the argument turns on
【Reach】why a neighboring-subfield geographer cares
【Venue check】Annals vs. specialty (one line)
【Type】Article / Forum / Commentary
【Next】aaag-literature-positioning
Supplementary resources
../../resources/exemplars/library.md— real Annals papers by area × method to calibrate fit../../resources/official-source-map.md— areas, scope, and article types
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 12:23
