Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› contemporary-accounting-research
contemporary-accounting-research
GitHub针对《Contemporary Accounting Research》的投稿定位与适配工具，涵盖期刊定位、选题范围、方法要求及拒稿风险，辅助会计稿件优化与选刊。
Trigger Scenarios
作者指定CAR为投稿目标
会计论文需匹配方法多元顶刊
评估稿件是否适合该期刊
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill contemporary-accounting-research -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "contemporary-accounting-research",
"description": "Use when targeting Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) or deciding whether an accounting manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics."
}
Contemporary Accounting Research (contemporary-accounting-research)
Journal positioning
CAR is the journal of the Canadian Academic Accounting Association and a North American elite, broad-scope accounting outlet. It is methodologically pluralistic — archival, experimental, analytical, and field/qualitative work all have a home — and spans financial accounting, auditing, tax, managerial accounting, and governance. Its taste rewards a clear contribution and rigorous design without privileging a single method. Readership is the broad international accounting professoriate.
This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live author instructions on the CAAA / Wiley site and the submission system.
When to trigger
- The author names CAR (or the North American broad-scope accounting elite) as the venue.
- An accounting paper using any rigorous method needs positioning for a method-pluralistic top outlet.
- A paper that is strong but slightly narrower or method-distinct from the TAR/JAR/JAE core needs an excellent home.
- The author needs CAR's desk-reject risks and a credible TAR / JAR / JAE / RAST / AOS alternative list.
Scope & topic fit
- Financial accounting and capital markets, disclosure, earnings, and reporting quality.
- Auditing, tax, managerial/cost accounting, governance, and accounting information systems.
- Experimental and analytical accounting, and rigorous field/qualitative studies of accounting practice.
- Contributions of broad interest across accounting, regardless of method.
Method & evidence bar
- Contribution + design rigor, method-appropriate: each paper is judged by the standards of its own method.
- Archival work needs credible identification and correct inference; experimental work needs valid manipulations, theory-driven hypotheses, and adequate power.
- Analytical work needs well-motivated models with relevant implications; field/qualitative work needs transparent, rigorous analysis and a clear path from data to insight.
- Robustness, alternative explanations, and institutional grounding are expected across methods.
Structure & house style
- The front end states the accounting question, its motivation, and the contribution to the literature explicitly.
- A strong CAR paper grounds its argument in theory or institutions appropriate to its method and states how accounting understanding changes.
- CAR expects an online appendix/supplementary materials for variable detail, robustness, and technical content, with data/code transparency.
- Writing is precise and accessible to a broad, method-diverse accounting audience.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the official source anchors for this journal family, then cite the current journal-specific page you checked. - Search the live site for "Contemporary Accounting Research submission guidelines / author instructions" and follow the current CAAA/Wiley version.
- Re-check formatting, abstract conventions, anonymization for double-blind review, reference style, and the supplementary-materials requirement.
- Re-check current data and code availability / replication policies and ethics/disclosure requirements.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- One sentence stating the contribution to accounting and why it is of broad interest.
- The contribution is stated appropriately for the method (identification / theory / mechanism / measurement / insight).
- The design clears current standards for its method.
- The introduction positions the paper against recent CAR / top-accounting work.
- Supplementary materials and data/code transparency match the current CAR guide.
Common desk-reject triggers
- An archival association with no identification or mechanism.
- An experiment with confounded manipulations or weak theory; a field study with opaque methods.
- An analytical model with no relevant implications.
- A narrow or atheoretical paper with no contribution of broad interest.
Re-routing decision
- Economics-based archival capital-markets / highest design bar →
journal-of-accounting-research; contracting/disclosure with positive-theory emphasis →journal-of-accounting-and-economics. - Broad flagship across methods →
the-accounting-review; analytical/empirical valuation and information economics →review-of-accounting-studies. - Interpretive/critical/behavioral-in-context →
accounting-organizations-and-society. - Capital-markets that is really finance →
journal-of-finance/journal-of-financial-economics; economics-core → a field economics venue.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Contemporary Accounting Research
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest topics>
[Method/evidence] <does the design clear CAR's method-appropriate bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <submission system / supplementary materials / data-code / disclosure>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 13:07
