Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› pnasnexus-submission
pnasnexus-submission
GitHubPNAS Nexus投稿前最终检查技能，涵盖研究契合度、APC与许可、文章类型、摘要与重要性声明、图表、统计及数据代码合规性。提供GO/NO-GO决策，支持从PNAS转移稿件场景。
Trigger Scenarios
准备通过pnasnexus.msubmit.net上传已完成的手稿
需要确认其他pnasnexus-*技能的输出结果完整无误
完成从PNAS的稿件转移并需核实缺失项
提交修订稿以确认无内容退化
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pnasnexus-submission -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "pnasnexus-submission",
"description": "Use as the final preflight before submitting to PNAS Nexus — a complete checklist across fit, open access\/APC\/license, article type & length, Significance Statement, abstract, classification, figures, statistics, data\/code, references, and required files. Covers the PNAS-transfer case and bundles a checklist and cover-letter template. Emits GO\/NO-GO."
}
Submission Preflight (pnasnexus-submission)
When to trigger
- The manuscript is "done" and you're about to upload via the submission portal (pnasnexus.msubmit.net).
- You want a single gate that confirms every other pnasnexus-* skill's output landed.
- You are completing a transfer from PNAS and need to confirm nothing is missing.
- A revision is going back and you need to confirm nothing regressed.
Master preflight checklist
Fit & venue
- Clears the broad, cross-disciplinary significance bar (
pnasnexus-fit); a reader from another division would care. - PNAS Nexus is the right venue (not better at flagship PNAS or a field journal).
- If transferring from PNAS: decline was about fit/priority, not soundness; prior reviews attached.
- Title is declarative, specific, parseable by a non-specialist.
Open access, APC & license
- Confirmed gold OA; APC figure obtained live from the OUP calculator (category + corresponding-author region) — not from memory (
pnasnexus-openaccess). - Waiver/discount checked (LMIC waiver/discount, Read & Publish, membership, discretionary).
- License chosen: ☐ CC BY 4.0 ☐ CC BY-NC 4.0 — CC BY if a funder mandate applies.
- Funder open-access requirements (license + deposit) satisfied.
- (Reminder) no Direct/Contributed track — standard editor-assigned review.
Article type, structure & length
- Article type chosen: ☐ Research Report ☐ Brief Report ☐ Registered Report (S1/S2) ☐ Perspective ☐ Review.
- Within the page budget for that type (Research Report: 6 pp preferred / 12 max); captions, legends, abstract, and Significance Statement counted.
- Order: Title / authors / Significance / Abstract / Intro / Results / Discussion / Materials and Methods (in main text) / back matter.
- Materials and Methods present in the main text (not solely in SI).
- Classification chosen: research area (Biological-Health-Medical / Physical-Engineering / Social-Political) + subcategory.
Significance Statement & abstract
- Significance Statement 50–120 words (Research Reports / Stage 2 Registered Reports), for a broad audience, distinct from the abstract.
- Abstract ≤ 250 words, single paragraph, no headings, ≥1 quantified result.
Figures & display items
- Within the graphical-element budget (~4 for a 6-pp Research Report; secondary items → SI).
- Sized to journal column widths; fonts legible at print size.
- Data shown (points + n); error bars defined; scale bars present.
- Colorblind-safe; color used where it helps (OA, online); raw unprocessed images retained.
Statistics & reproducibility
- Each claim: effect size + CI + n + test + assumptions.
- Biological vs technical replication clear; sample-size rationale stated.
- Randomization/blinding reported or justified; multiplicity controlled.
- Analysis code + scripts public and archived (DOI).
Data, code, materials, ethics
- Data, code, materials, and protocols deposited in a public repository with accession numbers/DOIs (mandatory upon publication; no "on request" only for primary data).
- Data and Code Availability Statement drafted and compliant; datasets/software cited with the
[dataset]tag. - Materials/reagent sharing plan; ethics approvals (IRB/IACUC/permits) as needed.
References
- Any readable style accepted at submission — but the list is consistent, complete, and fully resolvable; DOIs added.
- Data/software cited as formal references with the
[dataset]tag.
Required files & metadata
- Main text (title, Significance Statement, abstract, body, Materials and Methods, references).
- Figures at required resolution + figure legends; tables.
- Supporting Information (extended methods, supporting figs/tables, supplementary text); Datasets if any.
- Cover letter (advance + broad significance; article type; transfer note if applicable).
- Author list, affiliations, ORCIDs, corresponding author (drives APC/waiver eligibility — set deliberately).
- Author contributions, competing interests, funding statements.
- Classification + keywords entered in the submission system.
Final integrity sweep
- No over-claiming beyond the evidence (re-read the Significance Statement, abstract, and last paragraph).
- Significance Statement is genuinely broader/plainer than the abstract — not a duplicate — and within 50–120 words.
- Every figure's n, error bar, and test are defined in its legend.
- All accession numbers/DOIs are live and correct.
Templates
templates/checklist.md— copyable preflight checklist.templates/cover_letter_template.md— PNAS Nexus cover-letter scaffold (significance + article type + transfer note + suggested reviewers).
Output format
【Article type】 Research Report / Brief Report / Registered Report / Perspective / Review
【OA/APC/license】 APC confirmed-live; waiver path; license (CC BY / CC BY-NC); funder-compliant?
【Transfer from PNAS?】 N/A | yes (reviews attached; decline was fit/priority)
【Blocking gaps】 [...] (must fix before upload)
【Warnings】 [...] (should fix)
【Files ready】 main / figures+legends / SI / cover letter / metadata
【Verdict】 GO / NO-GO + the top 3 fixes
【Next】 submit | pnasnexus-rebuttal (after decision)
Anti-patterns
- Do not upload before the APC, waiver eligibility, and license are settled (
pnasnexus-openaccess). - Do not upload before data/code are deposited with accession numbers/DOIs.
- Do not submit without the Significance Statement (50–120 words) and the classification.
- Do not let the Significance Statement duplicate the abstract.
- Do not put Materials and Methods only in Supporting Information.
- Do not rely on memory; run the checklist top to bottom.
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 14:10
