Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› ieee-transactions-on-information-theory
ieee-transactions-on-information-theory
GitHub用于评估信息论手稿是否符合IEEE Transactions on Information Theory期刊要求。提供主题匹配检查、定理驱动的证明严谨性指导、可实现性与逆命题分析，以及论文与通信栏目的选择建议。
Trigger Scenarios
作者需评估信息论手稿的期刊适配度或进行框架重构
需要将方案性能描述转化为基本极限陈述（如容量、逆命题）
在Transactions与应用通信会议间，或Paper与Correspondence间做选择
需要针对信息论领域的证明严谨性及拒稿启发式规则
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieee-transactions-on-information-theory -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "ieee-transactions-on-information-theory",
"description": "Use when targeting IEEE Transactions on Information Theory or deciding whether an information-theory manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the theorem-driven achievability-and-converse bar, proof rigor, the paper-vs-correspondence framing, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics."
}
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (ieee-transactions-on-information-theory)
Journal positioning
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory is the archival home of information theory: Shannon theory, channel and source coding, capacity and rate-distortion, data compression, information-theoretic security and privacy, and the information-theoretic limits of statistical inference and learning. The defining expectation is a theorem with a complete proof — typically a matching achievability and converse, a new bound, or a sharp characterization of a fundamental limit. Applied communication-system papers that design or simulate a scheme without establishing an information-theoretic result are a poor fit and are routinely redirected. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live IEEE Transactions on Information Theory author information and submission system.
When to trigger
- The author names this journal for a Shannon-theory, coding-theory, or information-theoretic-limits manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
- A coding or communication result must be re-framed from "our scheme performs well" into a fundamental-limit statement (capacity, exponent, converse, optimality).
- The author is choosing between this Transactions and an applied-communications venue, or between a full Paper and a shorter Correspondence.
- The author needs the achievability-plus-converse rigor bar and desk-reject heuristics specific to information theory.
Scope & topic fit
- Shannon theory: channel capacity, source coding and rate-distortion, network information theory, multiterminal and feedback settings, error exponents.
- Coding theory: algebraic, graph-based (LDPC/polar), and lattice codes; bounds on codes; list decoding; coding for storage and distributed settings, with proofs.
- Information-theoretic security and privacy: secrecy capacity, wiretap channels, differential-privacy and information-leakage limits.
- Information-theoretic methods in statistics and learning: minimax and sample-complexity bounds, estimation and hypothesis-testing limits, information measures.
- Quantum and combinatorial information theory, and the mathematics (probability, combinatorics, convexity) underpinning information-theoretic results.
Method & evidence bar
- The central object is a theorem: an achievability result, a converse (often a matching pair), a new bound, or an exact/asymptotic characterization, with a complete and correct proof.
- Converse arguments matter as much as constructions; a scheme without a limit, or a claimed optimality without a converse, is usually incomplete here.
- Asymptotic regimes and order/constant tightness must be stated precisely; clarify whether results are exact, asymptotic, or bounds, and under what assumptions.
- Position against the closest information-theoretic prior work: what limit is newly characterized, what gap is closed, or what assumption is removed.
- Notation and problem formulation must be mathematically precise and standard before any result is stated; simulations, if any, are illustrative only.
Structure & house style
- IEEE format; the journal publishes full Papers and shorter Correspondence items — match the article type to the contribution and re-check current definitions on the live guide.
- The problem model (channel, source, code, estimator) and assumptions are stated precisely up front; main results are numbered theorems/lemmas with proofs in-text or in appendices per current format.
- The introduction positions the fundamental-limit question and the prior bounds, not application motivation.
- Figures are sparse and analytical (rate regions, exponents, bound comparisons); the paper stands on its theorems, not on plots.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the IEEE Author Center anchors, then cite the current Information Theory page you checked. - Search the live site for "IEEE Transactions on Information Theory information for authors" and follow the current submission-system version.
- Re-check article types (Paper vs. Correspondence), length/overlength policy, and the IEEE template.
- Confirm any expectations for proof completeness, supplementary appendices, and (where relevant) code for constructions.
- Re-check ORCID, competing-interests, funding, author-contribution, and AI-use disclosure requirements, and IEEE open-access options.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- The contribution is an information-theoretic theorem (achievability / converse / bound / characterization), not a scheme that "works."
- Where applicable, achievability is matched by a converse, or the gap is stated honestly.
- Every main result has a complete, correct proof under precise assumptions.
- The novelty is pinned to a specific prior limit or bound that is improved or newly established.
- Notation, channel/source model, and asymptotic regime are precise and standard.
- Article type (Paper vs. Correspondence) and length fit current limits.
Common desk-reject triggers
- Applied communications/coding paper with a designed scheme and simulations but no information-theoretic result.
- Achievability claimed with no converse, or an "optimality" claim with no matching lower bound.
- Incorrect, incomplete, or hand-waved proofs; undefined or non-standard notation.
- Incremental bound improvement with no new technique and negligible tightening.
- Scope mismatch: a machine-learning or systems paper using information-theoretic vocabulary without an actual limit theorem.
Re-routing decision
- Communication-system design/performance without a limit theorem →
ieee-transactions-on-communications. - Wireless-specific PHY/MAC scheme design →
ieee-transactions-on-wireless-communications. - Signal-processing estimation/detection methods →
ieee-transactions-on-signal-processing. - Topical systems-frontier coding/security in a special issue →
ieee-journal-on-selected-areas-in-communications. - Broad tutorial synthesis of an information-theory area →
proceedings-of-the-ieee.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest information-theory subtopics>
[Result type] achievability / converse / bound / exact characterization
[Achievability vs converse] <matched? gap stated honestly?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Paper / Correspondence
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / template / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 12:55
