Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› aaag-theory-building
aaag-theory-building
GitHub用于构建《美国地理学家协会年鉴》论文的概念贡献，将研究发现转化为基于空间、地方、尺度等地理理论的核心论点。指导用户提炼机制、明确适用范围并提升理论便携性，避免仅停留在描述性层面。
Trigger Scenarios
从发现X推导其对理解Z的地理意义
论文被批评为缺乏理论或仅是案例研究
决定推进或修正哪个地理概念
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-theory-building -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "aaag-theory-building",
"description": "Use when building the conceptual contribution of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — turning a finding into a geographic argument grounded in geographic theory (place, scale, space-time, environment-society, spatial process). Sharpens the argument; it does not run analyses."
}
Theory Building (aaag-theory-building)
An Annals paper is judged on the geographic argument, not only the result. The contribution must do conceptual work with geography's own apparatus — space, place, scale, region, territory, landscape, environment-society relations, spatial process — and be portable enough that other geographers can use it.
When to trigger
- Moving from "we found X" to "X means Y for how geographers understand Z"
- A reviewer said the paper is "descriptive," "atheoretical," or "a case study without a concept"
- Deciding which geographic concept the argument advances or revises
Build the argument with a geographic concept
Pick the concept the paper actually moves and make it load-bearing:
- Scale — the result holds/changes across scales; the argument is about cross-scale processes or the MAUP, not a single resolution.
- Place / region — what is specific vs. generalizable about the setting; what the case is a case of.
- Space-time / spatial process — diffusion, dependence, clustering, mobility as the mechanism, not a backdrop.
- Environment-society — the coupling itself is the object; neither side is mere context.
- Spatial data / representation — for Methods, the conceptual stakes of how space is measured and modeled.
Theory across the four areas (judged on its own terms)
| Area | What "theory" looks like | The bar |
|---|---|---|
| Methods | a formal/computational claim about geographic inference | generalizes beyond one dataset; states assumptions |
| Human | a social-spatial mechanism or relational concept | engages social theory as geography |
| Nature-Society | a mechanism coupling biophysical and social process | both sides theorized; feedbacks named |
| Physical | a process model / hypothesis about earth-surface behavior | testable, scale-aware, mechanism-explicit |
| General | a cross-area conceptual move | reorders how multiple areas see the topic |
The portability test (Annals-specific)
State the contribution as a sentence another geographer could import: "___ is best understood as ___ rather than ___, which means [a different subfield] should expect ___." If the contribution cannot be lifted out of your case, it is a finding, not yet a geographic argument.
From observation to claim
- Name the mechanism / concept, not just the pattern ("clustering" is a pattern; "why and at what scale the process clusters" is the argument).
- State scope conditions: where the argument holds and where it should break — geography rewards explicit scale and place boundaries.
- Distinguish your claim from the nearest rival concept (link to
aaag-literature-positioning).
Worked micro-example (illustrative)
A finding: "flood-relief funds reached richer neighborhoods faster in City X."
Pattern only: "relief was spatially unequal" (a map, not a concept)
Geographic argument: relief speed is governed by administrative SCALE mismatch — funds routed through
units that do not match the geography of need, so the same policy produces uneven relief by design
Mechanism: scalar mismatch between funding units and exposure units
Scope conditions: holds where exposure crosses administrative boundaries; breaks where they coincide
Portability: any geographer studying service delivery can ask whether the governing unit matches the
geography of the problem — the concept lifts out of floods
The pattern becomes a portable claim about scalar mismatch, not a description of one city's floods.
Checklist
- The argument names a geographic concept and does conceptual work with it
- Mechanism stated, not just pattern; scope conditions explicit
- Portability sentence written (another subfield could import it)
- Theory matched to the area's tradition and judged on its own terms
- The strongest rival concept is named and distinguished
Anti-patterns
- Descriptive mapping with no concept ("here is the spatial distribution of X")
- Borrowing a non-geographic theory wholesale with no spatial/place/scale work
- A Nature-Society argument that theorizes only the social or only the biophysical side
- Claiming generality from one case with no scope conditions
Output format
【Geographic concept】scale / place / space-time / environment-society / representation
【Mechanism】the process the argument turns on
【Scope conditions】where it holds / breaks
【Portability】the import sentence
【Next】aaag-research-design
Supplementary resources
../../resources/exemplars/library.md— papers whose contribution is a portable geographic concept../../resources/official-source-map.md— area definitions and scope
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 12:23
