restat-topic-selection
GitHub用于判断应用经济学项目是否适合发表在《经济统计评论》(REStat)，并协助将研究问题聚焦于实证与测量标准。它不执行分析，而是通过对比其他期刊定位、提供一句话测试和检查清单，帮助作者确定合适的发表 venue。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill restat-topic-selection -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "restat-topic-selection",
"description": "Use when deciding whether an applied-economics project fits The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) rather than AER \/ AEJ:Applied \/ J. Econometrics \/ a field journal, and sharpening the question to REStat's empirical-and-measurement bar. Decides venue fit and frames the question; it does not run the analysis."
}
Topic Selection & Venue Fit (restat-topic-selection)
When to trigger
- A project is between venues: REStat vs AER / AEJ:Applied vs J. Econometrics vs a field journal
- The question is interesting but you cannot say why it belongs at REStat specifically
- The contribution is a method but you are unsure REStat (applied, not methods-development) is the home
- You have a clean dataset / measurement advance and need to frame it as a REStat question
The REStat fit bar
REStat publishes applied economics and applied econometrics with a long measurement tradition: it wants a substantive economic question answered with credible identification or a careful measurement / data contribution that moves an applied literature. It is empirical-first and broad across fields (labor, public, development, trade, IO, health, environment, urban, macro-empirics), wider than a field journal but more specialized than AER. Two REStat sweet spots that distinguish it from siblings: (1) a clean causal estimate of a parameter an applied literature cares about; (2) a measurement or methods-applied advance — a new index, a better-measured construct, a corrected bias, an estimator put to serious applied use — where the application, not the theorem, is the point.
Fit decision table
| Your project | Better home | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Credible causal estimate of broad applied interest, careful measurement | REStat | The target |
| Agenda-setting, general-interest, longer, field-defining | AER | REStat takes more specialized applied work, often shorter |
| Identification-driven applied micro of broad interest | AEJ: Applied (close sibling) | Overlaps heavily; REStat leans more on measurement + applied econometrics |
| A new estimator with proofs; method is the contribution | J. Econometrics / Econometrica | REStat is applied — methods must be applied, not developed for their own sake |
| Sub-field-internal contribution (JOLE / JPubE / JDE) | Field journal | REStat wants wider applied readership |
| A short, sharp empirical result | REStat Short Paper (≤6000 words, ≤5 exhibits; source map refreshed 2026-06-20) | REStat has a short-format track for compact contributions |
The one-sentence test
Write the contribution in one sentence of the form: "We measure/identify [parameter/object] in [setting] using [design/data], and find [estimate], which matters for [applied question]." If the sentence is really "we develop a new estimator and prove its properties," you are at the wrong journal. If it is "we provide a better-measured [X] and show it changes [applied conclusion]," you are squarely in REStat's measurement tradition.
Checklist
- The economic question is applied, substantive, and stated in one sentence
- The contribution is identification or measurement — not a free-standing method
- You can name the closest 3–5 papers and what you add (hand to
restat-literature-positioning) - You have decided Article vs Short Paper (length/exhibit budget)
- Sibling check passed: not better at AER (general-interest) or J. Econometrics (method-first)
- If the contribution is measurement, the construct's validity and its applied payoff are both clear
Anti-patterns
- Pitching a new estimator as the headline contribution (that is J. Econometrics, not REStat)
- A clean estimate with no applied stakes — "identified but uninteresting"
- A measurement contribution with no applied conclusion that changes
- Assuming REStat = AEJ:Applied exactly; REStat weights measurement and applied econometrics more
- Framing as field-internal when the applied parameter has broad interest (sells REStat short)
Worked vignette: a measurement paper finding its home (illustrative)
An author has built a new county-level index of local labor-market tightness from job-posting data and shows it predicts wage growth. Pitched as "a new index," it reads as a data note with no clear home. Re-framed for REStat, the contribution becomes: "We measure local labor-market tightness with less error than the vacancy-to-unemployment proxy, and show that correcting this measurement reverses the estimated slope of the wage curve." Now the measurement advance changes an applied conclusion — squarely REStat's tradition, and stronger than either a bare index (a data note) or a new estimator (J. Econometrics). The same project would be undersold as field-internal at a labor journal and too narrow for AER.
Output format
【Venue verdict】REStat (Article / Short Paper) | redirect to: [AER / AEJ:Applied / J.Econometrics / field]
【One-sentence contribution】measure/identify [object] in [setting] via [design] → [estimate] → matters for [question]
【Contribution type】identification | measurement | applied-econometrics
【Closest prior work】[3–5 papers] (→ restat-literature-positioning)
【Length track】Article | Short Paper (≤6000 words, ≤5 exhibits)
【Next step】restat-literature-positioning
Version History
- 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 14:22
