moving-company-estimate-decoder
GitHub解析搬家报价单，区分绑定与非绑定类型、评估与保险，识别低价陷阱和欺诈红旗。提供实际支付场景预测及验证清单，帮助用户避免搬家骗局。
触发场景
安装
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill moving-company-estimate-decoder -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "moving-company-estimate-decoder",
"description": "Decode a moving company estimate — binding vs non-binding, the weight and cubic-feet games, valuation vs insurance, and the red flags that precede hostage-load stories. Use when someone asks 'is this moving quote legit', 'decode my moving estimate', 'binding vs non-binding estimate', or 'how do I avoid moving scams'. Produces an estimate-type decode with what-you'll-actually-pay scenarios, ranked red flags, the valuation decode, and the questions that separate real movers from brokers."
}
Moving Company Estimate Decoder Skill
The moving industry has a specialty: quotes that grow between signing and delivery, enforced by the fact that they have your stuff. The whole game is in three distinctions most customers never learn — binding vs. non-binding estimates, mover vs. broker, and "valuation" vs. insurance. This skill decodes the estimate against those three, prices the realistic worst case, and flags the patterns (lowball-then-reweigh, cubic-feet pricing, big deposits) that show up in every hostage-load story.
What This Skill Produces
- The estimate-type decode: binding / binding-not-to-exceed / non-binding — and what each means for the final bill
- The realistic-total scenarios: quoted vs. likely vs. worst-case, with the mechanisms that move the number
- Ranked red flags against the known-scam patterns
- The valuation decode (that "$0.60 per pound" line, explained on their actual goods) and the verification checklist
Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
- The estimate/contract text — including the fine print pages; the type of estimate is sometimes only in the fine print.
- The move shape — local vs. long-distance/interstate (very different regulatory pictures — flag interstate specifics as verify-with-regulator), inventory scale, dates.
- How the estimate was made — in-home/video survey vs. phone/online guess: a non-surveyed estimate is structurally a lowball.
- What's known about the company — name as quoted; the mover-vs-broker question gets a verification step regardless.
Framework: Severity Scale
- 🔴 Walk-away or fix-before-signing territory — non-binding estimates on long-distance moves (the reweigh is where the number grows — ask for binding-not-to-exceed), pricing by cubic feet instead of weight on interstate moves (volume is unauditable and famously inflatable), large deposits (reputable movers typically take payment at delivery — a big up-front deposit is the pattern's opening move), no in-home/video survey behind a firm-sounding number, the paperwork naming a different company than the one quoted (broker handoff — you don't know who's showing up), "we'll do the inventory on moving day."
- 🟡 Clarify before signing — accessorial fees left open (stairs, long-carry, shuttle — get them priced now), delivery window vs. date and the per-day delay terms, storage-in-transit pricing if dates might slip, the released-value valuation default (that's the $0.60/lb line — compute it: a 10-lb laptop = $6) vs. full-value protection pricing.
- 🟢 Standard — surveyed estimate, binding-not-to-exceed, payment at delivery, itemized accessorials, clear valuation options; a clean quote deserves the label.
Always compute the valuation reality: released value on their heaviest-cheap and lightest-expensive items (the sofa is overprotected; the laptop is worth $6), and the full-value-protection premium as the actual insurance decision. Verification checklist regardless of severity: regulator registration lookup for interstate movers (name the type of lookup, flag as jurisdiction-specific), the same-company-name check across quote/contract/truck, and recent reviews under the exact legal name.
Output Format
Moving Estimate Decode: [route, date — company as quoted]
1. The verdict — estimate type, the realistic total range, and the single most important fix (usually: convert to binding-not-to-exceed or walk).
2. The scenarios — quoted / likely / worst-case, each with the mechanism that gets the bill there.
3. Decode table
| Term | What the document says | What it means at delivery | Severity |
|---|
4. 🚩 Red flags, ranked — quoted text, the scam-pattern it matches, the fix or the walk-away call.
5. The valuation decision — released value computed on their goods vs. full-value protection cost; framed as the one genuine insurance choice in the document.
6. Verification checklist + questions — registration lookup, name-match check, survey request, deposit terms, accessorial pricing in writing.
End the artifact with, verbatim: "This is a plain-language reading, not legal/financial advice — laws vary by jurisdiction; confirm anything load-bearing with a qualified professional."
Quality Checks
- The estimate type is identified and its bill-at-delivery consequence stated first
- Scenarios include the mechanism, not just the number
- Released-value valuation is computed on the user's actual items
- Interstate-specific rules are flagged verify-with-regulator, not asserted
- The broker-vs-mover question gets a verification step even when nothing looks wrong
- The disclaimer line appears verbatim in the artifact
Anti-Patterns
- Do not treat all movers as scammers — the industry's honest majority is exactly why the pattern-matching works; decode, don't panic
- Do not accept "binding" verbally — the word must be on the document with a total
- Do not let cubic-feet pricing pass on a long-distance move without its flag
- Do not confuse valuation with insurance — the document does that on purpose; undo it
- Do not skip the name-match check — the quote, contract, and truck naming three companies is the whole story in one detail
Based On
Consumer-side moving-contract review — estimate-type triage, scam-pattern matching, valuation math, verification sequencing.
版本历史
- 54fad50 当前 2026-07-19 13:34
