Agent Skills
› mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
› fine-appeal-letter
fine-appeal-letter
GitHub用于撰写针对停车罚单或行政罚款的正式申诉信。基于法规认可的 grounds（如标识不清、程序错误、豁免情况或首次违规谅解）及证据，生成简短客观的申诉信，并评估胜诉概率或建议直接缴费，避免情绪化表达。
触发场景
收到停车罚单或行政罚款通知
希望以合理理由申诉罚款
不确定是否有合法申诉依据
安装
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill fine-appeal-letter -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "fine-appeal-letter",
"description": "Appeal a parking ticket, penalty charge, or administrative fine with the grounds that actually get appeals granted — not indignation. Use when someone got a ticket\/fine\/penalty notice and either has a legitimate case or wants an honest read on whether they do. Produces a short formal appeal letter built on recognised grounds (signage, procedure, mitigation, first-offence discretion), the evidence checklist, and a candid win-likelihood note — or the honest advice to just pay it."
}
Fine Appeal Letter
Appeals officers read thousands of letters. Anger loses; length loses; the word "outrageous" loses. What wins is a short letter matching one recognised ground to attached evidence. This skill writes that letter — and tells you when you don't have one, because the second-best outcome is not wasting an afternoon.
Required Inputs
- The notice — what for, when, where, the cited code/rule if shown, the deadline (appeals have clocks; state it back).
- What actually happened — the honest version. The letter will be built only from defensible facts.
- Evidence available — photos (signage, meter, bay markings), receipts, tickets, medical/breakdown documentation, prior clean record.
The Grounds That Work (match one, lead with it)
- Signage/markings defective or ambiguous — obscured, contradictory, missing at point of decision (photo-dependent; the strongest ground when real)
- Procedural error — wrong plate/location/time on the notice, issued outside rules, meter fault (the notice's own text is the evidence)
- The situation exempted you — loading, medical emergency, breakdown, valid permit not visible through no fault (documentation-dependent)
- Mitigation + first-offence discretion — no legal ground, but clean record + genuine circumstance + polite request for discretion; explicitly a request, not an argument (issuers grant more of these than people expect — but only to letters that don't pretend it's ground 1-3)
Output Format
- The honesty gate first — one short paragraph: which ground applies, its realistic strength (strong / arguable / discretion-only / none), and if none: "pay it; here's why fighting costs more."
- The letter — ≤250 words: reference numbers up top, ground stated in sentence one, facts in neutral past tense, evidence enumerated ("Photo A shows…"), the specific request (cancel / reduce to warning), deadline-respecting close. No adjectives about the issuer.
- Evidence checklist — exactly what to photograph or attach for the chosen ground, and what's missing that would upgrade the case.
- The realistic note — what happens next (timeline, escalation tier if refused) and whether escalation is worth it at this fine size.
Quality Checks
- Exactly one primary ground, stated in the first sentence — letters that argue three grounds signal none is strong
- Every factual claim is attachable-evidence-backed or clearly framed as the appellant's account
- Zero emotional language survives — the tone test is "written by a calm lawyer with a train to catch"
- The honesty gate is present even when the letter is written — strength stated, not implied
- Reference number, date, and deadline appear correctly and the request is specific
Anti-Patterns
- Do not fabricate or shade circumstances — beyond ethics, issuers cross-check timestamps and records, and a caught embellishment kills a real ground
- Do not write the indignation draft "to feel heard" — this skill produces the version that wins, not the version that vents
- Do not bury the ground under narrative — officers triage in the first sentence
- Do not promise outcomes — likelihood language stays calibrated ("this ground succeeds regularly when photographed clearly")
- Do not encourage appealing a fair fine on volume tactics — the honesty gate exists precisely for this
版本历史
- 961cbeb 当前 2026-07-11 19:25
