Agent Skills
› mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
› study-notes-synthesizer
study-notes-synthesizer
GitHub将杂乱的课程资料（笔记、幻灯片等）合成为结构化的考试复习指南。强调概念间的逻辑连接而非简单摘要，提供通俗解释、易混淆点对比、分层自测题及知识盲区清单，帮助用户高效备考。
触发场景
制作复习指南
合并我的笔记
为我准备考试
整理课程材料
安装
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill study-notes-synthesizer -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "study-notes-synthesizer",
"description": "Turn lecture notes, slides, and readings into one exam-ready study guide — synthesis, not summary. Use when asked to make a study guide, combine my notes, prep me for the exam, or organize this course material. Produces a structured guide: core concepts with plain-language explanations, connections between topics, worked examples where the subject has them, self-test questions, and an honest list of gaps in the source notes."
}
Study Notes Synthesizer Skill
The difference between notes and knowledge is structure: knowing how the pieces connect and what you'd be asked. This skill synthesizes messy course materials into a guide built for retrieval — and is honest about what the notes don't cover, because the gap you don't know about is the exam question you miss.
What This Skill Produces
- The concept map in prose — core ideas explained plainly, each linked to what it builds on
- Connections — where topics relate, contrast, or get confused with each other
- Self-test questions — retrieval practice at three depths (define / apply / compare-and-why)
- The gaps list — what the syllabus implies but the notes never cover
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- The materials — notes, slides, readings, past papers (paste in any order; messy is fine)
- The course and level — "Intro Micro, undergrad" calibrates depth
- The exam format if known — multiple choice, essays, problems — the guide's emphasis follows it
- What feels shakiest — the guide leads with the student's declared weak spots
Framework
- Synthesize, never sequence — organize by concept dependency, not by lecture order; lecture order is how it was taught, not how it's structured.
- Explain-then-anchor: every concept gets a plain-language explanation followed by the formal definition — plain-first is how understanding sticks; formal-first is how memorization masquerades as it.
- Confusable pairs get side-by-side treatment — the exam lives in the distinctions (elastic vs inelastic, mitosis vs meiosis, validity vs reliability).
- Questions at three depths per major concept: recall → application → "explain why X, not Y."
- Gaps are findings — if the syllabus lists a topic the materials barely touch, say so at the top, not in passing.
Output Format
Study Guide: [course] — [exam/date]
Start here (your declared weak spots): … ⚠ Gaps in your materials: [topics the notes don't cover enough to study from]
[Concept cluster 1]
Plainly: … Formally: … Builds on: … Confused with: …
Test yourself
- [recall] … 2. [apply] … 3. [why X not Y] …
[…clusters…]
One-page cram sheet
[The 15–20 highest-yield items, telegraphic]
Quality Checks
- Organized by concept dependency, not lecture chronology
- Every concept has a plain-language explanation before the formal one
- Confusable pairs are contrasted side by side
- Self-test questions span all three depths, with answers at the end
- The gaps list is present — an empty one must be earned, not assumed
Anti-Patterns
- Do not summarize lecture by lecture — that's compression, not synthesis, and it preserves the disorganization
- Do not restate definitions without a plain-language version — fluent jargon is how students discover in the exam that they never understood
- Do not invent material to fill gaps — flag them; wrong confidence is worse than known ignorance
- Do not write questions the notes can't answer — self-tests must be checkable against the guide
- Do not pad the cram sheet — 20 items maximum; a cram sheet with everything is a guide with nothing
版本历史
- 54fad50 当前 2026-07-19 13:12
