deck-outline-first
GitHub在制作幻灯片前先生成以主张为标题的演示文稿大纲。通过定义受众、目标和证据,确保标题连贯构成完整论点,并通过“扫读测试”验证逻辑,防止无效排版,提升决策效率。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-outline-first -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "deck-outline-first",
"description": "Outline a deck as headline sentences before opening the slide tool — each slide a claim that reads as an argument top to bottom, the audience-and-ask header, and the skim test that catches broken decks while they're still bullet points. Use when asked start this presentation, structure my deck, why does my deck feel like a data tour, or get sign-off before I build slides. Produces the headline outline, the per-slide evidence notes, the skim test result, and the build rules."
}
Deck Outline First Skill
Decks built slide-first inherit the tool's failure mode: hours of formatting sunk into slides whose argument was never designed, discovered broken in rehearsal (or worse, in the room). The outline-first discipline is outline-before-prose for the slide medium: every slide is one headline sentence — a claim, not a topic ("Churn concentrates in month two" not "Churn Analysis") — the headlines read in sequence as the complete argument, and the skim test (read only the headlines — does the case hold?) runs before any slideware opens. Slides then become evidence for their headlines, which is all slides were ever supposed to be.
What This Skill Produces
- The header — audience, the decision/ask, the time slot (which caps the slide count)
- The headline outline — one claim-sentence per slide, in argument order
- The evidence notes — per slide: what will carry the claim (the chart, the number, the quote — noted, not built)
- The skim test + build rules — the headlines-only read-through, and the rules that keep the build faithful
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- The deck's job — what the audience should decide or do at the end (meeting-prep-pack walk-away logic applies to the presenter too); decks without asks are documentaries
- The audience and the time slot — 10 minutes with executives is 6–8 slides; the slot arithmetic caps ambition before the outline overcommits
- The material — the findings/evidence available; headlines claim only what evidence can carry (evidence-grading keeps the claims honest)
- The reviewer — who would restructure this in review; they see the outline, not the finished deck
Framework: The Outline Rules
- Headlines are claims: every slide title is a full sentence asserting something — "Q3 missed because two enterprise deals slipped" — disagreeable at outline stage, which is the point. Topic titles ("Q3 Results") defer the thinking to the room, live.
- The sequence is the argument: headlines read top-to-bottom as the complete case — context claim → problem claim → cause claim → proposal claim → evidence-of-feasibility claim → the ask. Reordering costs one drag now; one rebuild later.
- The skim test is the gate: read only the headlines aloud — a listener who hears just those should get the entire argument and the ask. Where the skim stumbles (a leap, a missing step, two claims in one slide), the outline gets fixed — this test at bullet-stage catches what rehearsal catches at 10× the cost.
- Evidence is noted, not built: each headline gets one line of what will prove it ("the cohort chart, month-2 spike") — slides needing three pieces of evidence are two slides; headlines with no available evidence are wishes, and the outline is where wishes get caught (chart-choice picks the form later, from this note).
- The outline gets reviewed, then the build stays faithful: the five-minute outline review with the key stakeholder replaces the slide-48 restructuring; the build rules — one headline per slide, the evidence note becomes the body, nothing new spawns without re-passing the skim test — keep the deck the outline's child rather than its replacement.
Output Format
Deck Outline: [deck] — for [audience] to [ask] · [T] min → ≤[N] slides
The Headlines (in order)
- [Claim sentence] — evidence: [what carries it]
- … [The ask slide explicit at the end]
The Skim Test
[The headlines read as one paragraph — does the argument hold? · the stumbles fixed]
Review + Build Rules
[Outline reviewer + the one question · build: headline-per-slide, evidence-as-body, no silent spawns]
Quality Checks
- Every slide title is a disagreeable claim sentence
- The headline sequence survives the skim test as a complete argument
- Each headline's evidence exists and fits one slide
- The slide count fits the time slot's arithmetic
- The outline was reviewed before slideware opened
Anti-Patterns
- Do not open the slide tool first — formatting is where broken arguments hide from their authors
- Do not title slides with topics — topics defer the argument to the live room
- Do not stack claims on one slide — one headline, one slide, or the skim test lies
- Do not headline what evidence can't carry — the outline is where overclaims are cheap to fix
- Do not let the build drift from the outline — every silent new slide re-breaks the tested argument
Version History
- 471c606 Current 2026-07-22 14:47


