consulting-proposal
GitHub撰写以结果为导向的咨询提案，聚焦客户痛点与价值而非工时。包含问题重述、目标成果、实施方法、时间线、分层报价及案例背书，引导决策从是否转为选择方案，提升中标率并防止范围蔓延。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill consulting-proposal -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "consulting-proposal",
"description": "Write a consulting proposal that wins the engagement — outcomes over hours. Use when asked to write a consulting proposal, a project proposal, a pitch for a client engagement, or to respond to an RFP. Produces a proposal — the client's problem in their words, your approach & deliverables, outcomes\/value, timeline & phases, investment with options, and why-you — framed around results, not a task list. Ready to export as a designed PDF."
}
Consulting Proposal Skill
Clients don't buy hours — they buy an outcome and the confidence you'll deliver it. Losing proposals lead with the consultant's process and a flat day-rate; winning ones lead with the client's problem and the value of solving it. This skill writes a proposal framed around results, with tiered options that anchor on value — ready to drop into the themed PDF export.
Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
- The client & their problem — who they are, the pain, and (crucially) the cost of not solving it.
- Your approach — how you'd solve it and the concrete deliverables.
- Outcomes — the results the client gets, ideally quantified.
- Commercials — your pricing model (fixed/retainer/value-based), timeline, and what's out of scope.
Output Format
Proposal: [engagement] for [client]
1. The problem (their words) — restate their situation and the cost of the status quo. Show you get it before you pitch. This earns the read.
2. Objectives & outcomes — what success looks like, in their metrics. Lead with the value, not the activity.
3. Approach & deliverables — the phases and the concrete artifacts they'll receive. Enough detail to build confidence, not a padded task list.
4. Timeline — phases with milestones and rough dates.
5. Investment — the price, framed against the value/cost-of-inaction. Offer 2–3 tiered options (e.g. core / recommended / comprehensive) — options shift the conversation from "yes/no" to "which," and anchor on the bigger one. State what's included per tier and what's out of scope.
6. Why me/us — relevant proof: comparable results, credentials, a short case reference. Brief.
7. Next step — one clear action to move forward (sign, a kickoff call, a deposit).
Quality Checks
- Opens with the client's problem and the cost of inaction, not your bio/process
- Framed around outcomes/value, not hours or a task list
- Offers tiered options (anchors on value, gives a "which" not a "whether")
- Scope and out-of-scope are explicit (prevents scope creep later)
- Proof is specific and relevant, kept brief
- Ends with one clear next step
Anti-Patterns
- Do not lead with "About us / our methodology" — lead with their problem; they care about themselves
- Do not sell hours/day-rate as the headline — price the outcome; hours invite haggling
- Do not give a single take-it-or-leave-it price — tiered options win more and at higher value
- Do not leave scope fuzzy — undefined scope is how fixed-price engagements bleed
- Do not pad the deliverables list — confidence comes from clarity, not volume
Based On
Value-based consulting-proposal practice (Alan Weiss-style outcomes-over-hours, tiered options, anchor on value).
Version History
- a38bc30 Current 2026-07-05 11:13
