marketing-psychology
GitHub运用行为心理学原则（如社会认同、损失厌恶等）优化营销素材，提升转化率并降低摩擦。强调诚实应用，严禁使用黑暗模式，确保在符合伦理的前提下增强说服力。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill marketing-psychology -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "marketing-psychology",
"description": "Apply behavioral-psychology principles to a marketing asset or decision — ethically. Use when asked to make copy\/a page\/an offer more persuasive, apply psychological triggers, reduce friction, or understand why something does\/doesn't convert. Produces the relevant principles (social proof, scarcity, anchoring, loss aversion, etc.), how to apply each to the specific asset, and a line on staying ethical (no dark patterns)."
}
Marketing Psychology Skill
People don't decide rationally — they use mental shortcuts. Marketing psychology applies those predictably and honestly: real social proof, true scarcity, sensible defaults, clear framing. This skill diagnoses an asset or decision through behavioral principles and gives concrete, specific applications — while drawing a hard line at manipulation and dark patterns (which win a click and lose the trust).
Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
- The asset or decision — the page/email/offer/pricing/CTA you want to make more persuasive.
- Audience & context — who it's for, their mindset, where they are in the funnel.
- The goal & the friction — the action you want, and what's holding people back (cost, risk, effort, trust, confusion).
- What's true — real proof points, actual constraints (so applications are honest, not invented).
Output Format
Marketing psychology: [asset]
The decision & the friction — what you want the person to do and the specific barrier (risk? effort? trust? price?). This selects the principles.
Principles that apply (ranked) — the few most relevant, each with a specific application to this asset:
| Principle | Why it fits the friction | Concrete application here |
|---|---|---|
| Social proof | (e.g. "show '2,300 teams use this' near the CTA") | |
| Loss aversion / framing | ||
| Anchoring | ||
| Scarcity / urgency (only if real) | ||
| Commitment & consistency | ||
| Reciprocity | ||
| Reducing friction (defaults, fewer choices) |
(Pick the relevant ones — not all of them. Friction-reduction often beats adding persuasion.)
Rewrites / changes — 1–3 concrete before→after edits applying the top principles.
Ethics line — flag anything that would be a dark pattern (fake scarcity, forced continuity, confirm-shaming, hidden costs) and why to avoid it. Real beats manufactured — it converts and retains.
Quality Checks
- The principles chosen are matched to the actual friction, not a generic checklist
- Each principle has a specific, concrete application to this asset (not theory)
- Scarcity/urgency is only used where it's genuinely true
- At least one friction-reduction move is considered (often higher-leverage than persuasion)
- An ethics line flags dark patterns and keeps applications honest
Anti-Patterns
- Do not invent fake scarcity, countdowns, or fake social proof — it's a dark pattern and it backfires
- Do not list every principle — pick the few that fit the specific friction
- Do not stay theoretical — every principle needs a concrete application to the asset
- Do not use confirm-shaming, forced continuity, or hidden costs — short-term lift, long-term trust loss
- Do not ignore friction — sometimes the fix is removing a step, not adding persuasion
Based On
Behavioral economics & persuasion research (Cialdini's principles, Kahneman framing/loss aversion, Fogg behavior model) — applied ethically.
Version History
- a38bc30 Current 2026-07-05 11:38
