launch-tiering-framework
GitHub用于根据产品发布的影响力和新颖性评估并分配T1/T2/T3发布等级,从而规划匹配的GTM活动、渠道、负责人及检查清单,确保资源投入与发布规模相称。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill launch-tiering-framework -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "launch-tiering-framework",
"description": "Tier a product launch (T1\/T2\/T3) and scope the right go-to-market effort. Use when asked to decide a launch tier, right-size launch activities, build a launch tiering framework, or plan channels and effort proportional to a launch's impact. Produces a tiering recommendation with the scoring rationale, the activities and channels for that tier, owners, and a lightweight launch checklist."
}
Launch Tiering Framework Skill
Not every release deserves a full launch. This skill decides how big a launch should be, then scopes the go-to-market effort to match — so big bets get the push they deserve and minor updates don't burn the team or the audience's attention.
What This Skill Produces
- A launch tier (T1 / T2 / T3) with the scoring rationale
- The set of activities and channels appropriate to that tier
- Owners and a timeline
- A right-sized launch checklist and success metrics
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- What's launching — the feature/product and who it's for
- Impact signals — revenue potential, strategic importance, audience reach, competitive pressure, customer demand
- Novelty — incremental improvement vs new capability vs new product
- Readiness — GA vs beta, docs, enablement, support readiness
- Constraints — team bandwidth, date pressure, dependencies
- Any house tiering definitions already in use (use them if provided)
Tiering Rubric
Score the launch on impact and novelty; the higher of the two typically sets the tier.
- T1 — Major: new product or flagship capability; strategic; broad audience; competitive stakes. Full GTM.
- T2 — Notable: meaningful new feature; matters to a segment; worth proactive comms. Moderate GTM.
- T3 — Minor: incremental improvement, fix, or narrow feature. Low-effort, in-product + notes.
If readiness lags the tier the impact warrants, flag the gap rather than downgrading silently.
Process
- Score impact and novelty using the signals provided; note the reasoning.
- Assign the tier (higher of impact/novelty), and state what would move it up or down.
- Scope activities to the tier — don't over- or under-invest.
- Assign owners and a timeline across product, PMM, content, sales, support.
- Right-size the checklist and define how you'll measure success at that tier.
Output Format
Launch Tiering — [Launch name]
Recommended tier: [T1 / T2 / T3]
Scoring
| Dimension | Signal | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Impact | [revenue/strategic/reach/competitive/demand] | [high/med/low] |
| Novelty | [incremental / new capability / new product] | [high/med/low] |
| Readiness | [GA/beta · docs · enablement · support] | [ready / gap] |
Rationale: [why this tier] · Would change if: [what flips it]
Activities for [Tier]
| Workstream | Do | Skip |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning/messaging | [e.g. full narrative vs one-liner] | [—] |
| Content | [blog, video, launch post vs release notes only] | [—] |
| Channels | [press, email, social, in-app vs in-app only] | [—] |
| Sales/CS enablement | [kit + training vs FYI] | [—] |
| Events | [webinar/launch event vs none] | [—] |
Owners & Timeline
| Workstream | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| [Item] | [role] | [date] |
Launch Checklist ([tier-sized])
- [Only what this tier needs]
Success Metrics
- [Tier-appropriate: awareness/adoption/pipeline/activation]
Quality Checks
- The tier follows from explicit impact/novelty scoring
- Activities match the tier — no full push for a T3, no silence for a T1
- Readiness gaps are flagged, not hidden by downgrading
- Every workstream has an owner and date
- Success metrics fit the tier's ambition
Anti-Patterns
- Do not launch everything at T1 — attention and effort are finite
- Do not treat a strategic launch as T3 because the team is busy — flag the gap
- Do not skip enablement on a tier that sales needs to sell
- Do not measure a T3 with T1 metrics (or vice versa)
- Do not ignore existing house tier definitions if provided
Example Trigger Phrases
- "What launch tier should this feature be?"
- "Right-size the go-to-market for our [feature] launch"
- "Build a launch tiering framework for our team"
- "Plan T2 launch activities and owners for [product]"
Version History
- a38bc30 Current 2026-07-05 11:25


