Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› phg-theory-building
phg-theory-building
GitHub用于构建人文地理学综述的核心概念，通过引入、扩展或创造概念来重组文献。适用于从描述性总结转向理论综合的场景，帮助确立承载论证的‘承重’概念，避免实证分析。
Trigger Scenarios
将分散文献重组为单一论点时
被批评综述缺乏理论或仅具描述性时
决定按现有分类还是新概念组织文章时
选择引入、扩展或首创概念时
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-theory-building -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "phg-theory-building",
"description": "Use when building the conceptual apparatus that organizes a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay — the load-bearing concept that carries the argument and re-orders a literature. Sharpens the concept; it does not gather sources or run analyses (PiHG publishes no empirical work)."
}
Theory Building (phg-theory-building)
A PiHG essay lives or dies on its organizing concept — the idea through which a scattered literature is re-read into one argument. Unlike an empirical paper, where theory frames a study, here the concept is the instrument of synthesis: it decides what counts, how the sources relate, and what the field should see differently. Build it before you draft.
When to trigger
- Moving from "there is a literature on X" to "here is the concept that re-orders X"
- A reviewer said the review is "descriptive," "a-theoretical," or "just a summary"
- Choosing between organizing the essay by the literature's own buckets vs. by your concept
- Deciding whether to import, extend, or coin a concept
Pick the conceptual move
| Move | What it does | Best when |
|---|---|---|
| Import a concept from elsewhere | Read the literature through an outside lens it has ignored | The field is siloed and an external idea exposes a shared structure |
| Extend / rework an existing concept | Show the field's own concept has drifted or is under-specified, and re-specify it | A key term is doing too much or means different things to different camps |
| Coin / name a concept | Give a name to a pattern the field keeps hitting but has not named | Several literatures circle the same unnamed thing |
| Genealogize a concept | Trace and periodize how a concept changed, to intervene in its next phase | A concept has a long, contested history |
Most PiHG essays do one of these well. Trying to do all four dilutes the intervention.
The load-bearing test
Your concept must do work the literature's own categories cannot. State it as: "Read through ___, these otherwise-separate literatures are revealed to be ___, which the field has missed because ___." If the essay could be reorganized under the literature's existing headings with nothing lost, the concept is decorative, not load-bearing — and the review collapses into a summary.
Make the concept portable
PiHG rewards concepts other geographers can carry to their own cases. A good organizing concept:
- Names a relation or mechanism, not just a theme ("the circuit," "scalar mismatch," "relational precarity" — not "the platform economy").
- Travels across sub-fields (economic, urban, feminist, political ecology) rather than fitting only one.
- Has scope conditions: where it illuminates and where it should break — a concept that explains everything explains nothing.
Theory across human-geography traditions
| Tradition | What "theory" looks like here | The bar |
|---|---|---|
| Political-economic | a structural mechanism (capital, labor, rent, state) | specify the mechanism, not just "capitalism" |
| Post-structural / cultural | a relational or discursive concept | show what it lets the field do, not just say |
| Feminist / post-colonial | a critique that reworks whose knowledge counts | change practice, not only vocabulary |
| More-than-human / relational | a concept re-distributing agency across human/non-human | keep it analytically usable, not just gestural |
Worked micro-example (illustrative)
Literature's own buckets: precarity / algorithms / resistance (three parallel conversations)
Decorative theory: "we adopt a critical lens on platform labor" (renames, organizes nothing)
Load-bearing concept: "the CIRCUIT" — control, precarity, and resistance are the same relation seen from
different nodes of a spatial circuit; the field missed this by treating the platform as a bounded object
Portability: any labor geographer can ask where in the circuit a given effect is produced
Scope conditions: holds where labor is distributed across nodes; weaker for genuinely single-site work
Checklist
- One clear organizing concept, not a theme or a lens-in-name-only
- It reorganizes the literature (load-bearing test passed)
- It names a relation/mechanism and is portable across sub-fields
- Scope conditions stated (where it illuminates / breaks)
- The conceptual move (import / extend / coin / genealogize) is chosen and singular
Anti-patterns
- A "lens" named in the abstract that never reorganizes anything
- Organizing the essay by the literature's own headings and calling it theory
- A concept so broad it fits every case and discriminates nothing
- Coining jargon for a pattern that already has a good name
- Borrowing a non-geographic theory wholesale with no reworking for space/place
Output format
【Concept】the organizing idea in one phrase
【Move】import / extend / coin / genealogize
【Load-bearing】what it reveals that the literature's own categories cannot
【Portability】the sentence another sub-field could import
【Scope conditions】where it holds / breaks
【Next】phg-literature-positioning
Supplementary resources
../../resources/exemplars/library.md— landmark works organized by a single portable concept../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md— a concept ("the circuit") doing the organizing work
Version History
- 9f86f09 Current 2026-07-19 17:22
