molcell-framing
GitHub用于在起草前锁定单机制叙事，将实验数据转化为分子问题-机制-生理后果的故事。强制聚焦单一机制，映射图表逻辑，规范引言结构与标题，剔除无关数据。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill molcell-framing -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "molcell-framing",
"description": "Use to lock the single-mechanism arc before drafting — converts a set of correct experiments into one Molecular Cell story that runs molecular question → the mechanism → physiological consequence, not a catalog of techniques."
}
Single-Mechanism Framing (molcell-framing)
When to trigger
- The experiments are solid but the manuscript reads as "we did ChIP-seq, then crystallography, then a knockout."
- The introduction opens with pages of background before the molecular question.
- Colleagues ask "what is the one molecular event this paper proves?"
- You can list the assays but not the single mechanism they establish.
Molecular Cell tells ONE mechanistic story
A Molecular Cell Article is a single argument that resolves one molecular question:
Molecular question → the mechanism we proved → why it matters physiologically.
Every figure is a step in proving that one mechanism. Data that don't serve the mechanism belong in Supplemental Information or a different paper. Force the whole paper into one sentence:
"We show that [molecular actor] [does what, at what level of detail], which explains [process] and is required for [physiological outcome]."
If you cannot fill all three brackets with a molecular mechanism (a residue, a base, an interface, a step), the framing is not ready — and possibly the mechanism is not complete (molcell-fit).
Map figures to the proof of mechanism
Molecular Cell readers expect the argument to feel airtight: each mechanistic claim is set up, tested by orthogonal methods, and alternatives are excluded before you move on.
- Fig. 1 — establish the phenomenon and pose the molecular question.
- Figs. 2–3 — define the mechanism (structure / biochemistry / reconstitution: the molecular event).
- Fig. 4 — separation-of-function: point mutants that break only the mechanism, tying it to the phenotype.
- Figs. 5–6 — physiological relevance (in cells / in vivo) and generality.
If the separation-of-function figure is missing, reviewers will demand it — better to see the gap now.
Molecular Cell introduction shape (~3 short paragraphs)
- The molecular problem — the process and the specific step that is not understood.
- The gap / hypothesis — what molecular event is unknown, and the question you pose.
- What we found — the mechanism in molecular terms, ending on the physiological consequence. The reader knows the mechanism before Results.
Molecular Cell introductions are shorter and more focused than Cell's — you are addressing molecular biologists, not a general readership, so open at the level of the mechanism, not the disease.
The "why now" hooks
Name which applies:
- A method makes the molecular step visible (cryo-EM at near-atomic resolution, single-molecule, ribosome profiling, nanopore, cross-linking MS).
- A reconstituted system finally isolates the activity from cellular confounds.
- A separation-of-function allele lets you test the mechanism without pleiotropy.
- A longstanding molecular controversy is now decidable.
Title discipline
- Declarative and mechanistic: "PROTEIN X unwinds Y by mechanism Z" beats "Insights into Y."
- The noun phrase names the molecular actor and the molecular action, not just the system.
- Avoid "Towards", "A study of", "Characterization of", "Role of", "Novel".
- Molecular Cell titles often name the complex and the molecular verb (binds, unwinds, methylates, degrades, licenses).
Narrative anti-frames (rewrite these)
| Anti-frame | Reframe |
|---|---|
| "We characterized complex X." | "Complex X licenses step Y by clamping substrate Z." |
| "Here we report several findings on…" | "We define the molecular mechanism by which…" |
| A technique catalog (ChIP-seq, then structure…) | One mechanism; each method is a converging line of proof |
| "Our data are consistent with model M." | "Point mutants that break only step S decide for model M." |
| "Structure reveals a novel fold." | "The structure explains how X selects substrate Y." |
Output format
【One-sentence mechanism】 "We show that [actor] [molecular action], which explains ... and is required for ..."
【Figure-to-proof map】 phenomenon / mechanism / separation-of-function / physiological relevance
【Why-now hook】 which applies
【Intro skeleton】 molecular problem / gap / mechanism+consequence
【Working title】 declarative, names the molecular actor + action
【Risk】 any step of the proof missing? (→ molcell-fit)
【Next】 molcell-writing
Anti-patterns
- Do not present parallel technique mini-stories — Molecular Cell wants one mechanism.
- Do not bury the mechanism below background; molecular biologists want it in the first paragraphs.
- Do not inflate with "novel/unprecedented" — prove the molecular step, don't label it.
- Do not frame a structure paper around the fold; frame it around the mechanism it decides.
Confirm structural expectations against the current Molecular Cell information-for-authors page.
Version History
- 9f86f09 Current 2026-07-19 17:04
