Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› art-history
art-history
GitHub辅助评估艺术史稿件是否适合《Art History》期刊。聚焦理论批判与方法论反思，提供选题定位、框架重构建议及拒稿启发式规则，强调原创论点与图像细读的深度结合。
触发场景
作者指定投稿该刊并需评估匹配度
需将研究重构以突出方法论贡献
在专业期刊与通识期刊间做选择
需要了解该刊的理论门槛和拒稿标准
安装
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill art-history -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "art-history",
"description": "Use when targeting Art History (the Association for Art History journal) or deciding whether a theoretically engaged art-history manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit as a critically and methodologically reflective venue, the argument and close-analysis bar, primary-source command, Chicago house style, image-rights expectations, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics."
}
Art History (art-history)
Journal positioning
Art History is the journal of the Association for Art History (published with Wiley), a venue defined less by period or region than by its theoretical and critical engagement: it publishes art history that reflects on its own methods, tests new approaches, and brings critical theory, social history, gender, postcolonial, and visual-culture perspectives to bear on objects and images. Its defining expectation is an original argument that is conceptually ambitious and methodologically self-aware — close analysis married to an explicit theoretical or historiographical stake. A competent but methodologically conventional object study with no critical purchase is a poor fit, however well-documented. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid. It does not replace the journal's current submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Art History author instructions and style guide.
When to trigger
- The author names Art History for a theoretically or critically engaged art-history manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
- A study must be re-framed to foreground its methodological contribution or theoretical intervention, not just its findings.
- The author is choosing between Art History and a generalist or connoisseurship-led art-history journal.
- The author needs the journal's critical-engagement bar and desk-reject heuristics.
Scope & topic fit
- Art history that advances or interrogates method: new analytical frameworks, reflexive accounts of the discipline, and rethinking of its categories.
- Critical-theoretical readings of objects and images — social history of art, gender and sexuality, race and empire, materiality, the body, and the gaze.
- Visual and material culture studied across media and beyond the canonical fine arts, including global and decolonial perspectives.
- Reception, display, and the institutional and ideological framing of art, treated conceptually rather than descriptively.
- Period studies (any era) when the contribution reshapes how the field thinks, not merely what it knows.
- Historiographical and disciplinary critique that opens new lines of inquiry.
Method & evidence bar
- The contribution is an original argument with an explicit theoretical or methodological stake — name the intervention, not just the topic.
- Close visual and material analysis is integral and does conceptual work, tied to the argument rather than appended as illustration.
- Command of primary sources and documents is critical and self-aware, attentive to the conditions under which objects and evidence were produced and circulate.
- Theoretical and historical framing is engaged precisely and put to use, not invoked as ornament or jargon.
- Engagement with relevant scholarship situates the piece in current debates and shows what its method changes.
- Interpretive claims are proportionate to the evidence and reflexive about the analyst's own categories and position.
Structure & house style
- Scholarly article with a sustained, conceptually framed argument; re-check current word limits and article types on the live guide.
- Chicago notes-and-bibliography style with full footnotes; visual and archival citations follow the journal's form.
- Double-blind review: anonymize the manuscript (self-citations and acknowledgements) per current policy.
- Image rights are central: secure reproduction permissions for every illustration and account for fees and embargoes before acceptance.
- Figures must meet the journal's and publisher's specifications (resolution, format, captions, credit lines), with an illustration list and permissions documentation.
- Foreign-language sources are quoted and translated per policy; theoretical prose remains precise and readable.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the Association for Art History / Wiley anchors, then cite the current Art History page you checked. - Search the live site for "Art History journal author guidelines" and follow the current version.
- Re-check article types and word limits, the Chicago citation/footnote form, and the abstract requirement.
- Confirm anonymization requirements for double-blind review.
- Re-check image-reproduction permissions, figure/publisher specifications, the illustration list, and any illustration-cost policy.
- Re-check competing-interest, funding (if applicable), and AI-use disclosure, plus any translation policy for non-English sources.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- The theoretical or methodological intervention is named explicitly — what it changes about how the field works.
- Close visual/material analysis does conceptual work and is tied to the argument, not appended.
- Primary sources are read critically and reflexively, and the claims respect their limits.
- The manuscript is anonymized for double-blind review per current policy.
- Chicago footnotes/citations and any required abstract follow the current style guide.
- Reproduction permissions are secured and figures meet specifications, with translations handled.
Common desk-reject triggers
- A methodologically conventional object study with no critical or theoretical purchase.
- Theory invoked as ornament or jargon rather than put to analytic work on the objects.
- Thin or uncritical use of visual evidence and primary documents, or overreaching claims.
- No explicit positioning in current art-historical or theoretical debates.
- Missing or unsecured image permissions, or figures below specification.
- Wrong venue: a descriptive or connoisseurial piece better served by an object-led journal.
Re-routing decision
- Broad, all-periods generalist art-history article →
the-art-bulletin. - Contemporary art, criticism, theory, or the avant-garde →
october. - Connoisseurship, attribution, provenance, or museum/exhibition scholarship →
the-burlington-magazine. - Interdisciplinary critical theory across the humanities →
critical-inquiry. - Aesthetics / philosophy of art is the core contribution →
the-journal-of-aesthetics-and-art-criticism.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Art History
[Field/period/region] <closest field, period, region>
[Argument] <the theoretical/methodological intervention in one line>
[Objects/images] <what works are analyzed and how the visual analysis does conceptual work>
[Method/scholarship] <does the critical framing + positioning clear the engagement bar?>
[Image permissions] <are reproduction rights and figure specs in hand?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <word limit / Chicago style / anonymization / image permissions / translation>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
版本历史
- 1839142 当前 2026-07-05 12:56
