commres-workflow

GitHub

通信研究论文工作流路由器,根据生命周期阶段和研究类型(实验、调查或内容分析)将用户路由至对应的子技能。确认论文符合定量理论驱动要求后,按标准流程分发任务。

Communication-Research-Skills/skills/commres-workflow/SKILL.md brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

触发场景

启动新论文且不知从何开始 项目中途不确定下一步操作 判断研究类型是否符合期刊要求 收到决定信需回复

安装

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-workflow -g -y
更多选项

非标准路径

npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Communication-Research-Skills/skills/commres-workflow -g -y

不安装直接使用

npx skills use brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills@commres-workflow

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-workflow -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "commres-workflow",
    "description": "Use as the entry point for any Communication Research (CR) manuscript. Routes to the right CR sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and study type (experiment, survey\/panel, or content analysis). It dispatches; it does not draft content."
}

CR Workflow Router (commres-workflow)

The orchestrator for a Communication Research (CR) submission. CR is SAGE's quantitative, social-scientific communication journal — predominantly hypothesis-testing experiments and surveys with rigorous measurement and explicit theory. The router's first job is to confirm the paper is theory-driven and quantitatively identified, then send the user to the matching skill.

When to trigger

  • Starting a new CR paper and unsure where to begin
  • Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
  • Deciding whether the study type (experiment / survey-panel / content analysis) is CR-shaped
  • Returning with a decision letter (route to commres-rebuttal)

First question: is this a quantitative, theory-testing communication paper?

Situation Read Route to
Hypothesis-driven experiment or survey, measured constructs core CR fit normal pipeline below
Computational/text-as-data with hypothesis tests on communication processes in scope if theory-led pipeline; emphasize measurement validation
Mostly qualitative / interpretive / critical likely off-fit re-route to Journal of Communication / New Media & Society before polishing
Method/measurement paper for its own sake off-fit Communication Methods and Measures

CR is not multi-paradigm. If the contribution is interpretive or a platform description, the generalist or digital-media siblings fit better — decide this before investing in the pipeline.

Routing map (stage → skill)

Idea / fit?                          → commres-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field?      → commres-literature-positioning
What are the hypotheses & mechanism? → commres-theory-building
Is the design causally defensible?   → commres-research-design
Are the analyses sound?              → commres-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear?              → commres-tables-figures
Does it read as social science?      → commres-writing-style
Data, code & open practices?         → commres-transparency-and-data
How will it be judged?               → commres-review-process
Ready to submit?                     → commres-submission
Got an R&R / decision?               → commres-rebuttal

Default order

topic-selection → literature-positioning → theory-building → research-design → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → transparency-and-data → review-process → submission → rebuttal

Iterate: most CR papers loop theory ↔ design ↔ measurement several times before writing-style. If the design is prospective, route to commres-transparency-and-data early to preregister.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating CR like a generalist or qualitative outlet — CR judges quantitative, theory-testing work
  • A bare effect with no mechanism (mediation/moderation) — CR rewards process, not main effects alone
  • Content analysis without reported intercoder reliability
  • Causal language on a single cross-sectional survey
  • Leaving the data-availability statement and reproducibility materials until acceptance

Router pass for Communication Research

Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the communication process, the measured constructs, the study design, and the inferential claim; then judge whether the manuscript answers CR's real reader: a quantitatively trained communication scientist who weighs theory, measurement validity, identification, and effect interpretation.

  • Do the pass: Run the pack as a sequence — fit gate, theory/measurement gate, identification gate, evidence gate, transparency gate, output contract; stop when a gate lacks evidence.
  • Return a ledger: give claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows so the next agent edits rather than rediscovers the issue.
  • Sibling guard: Journal of Communication (ICA flagship, all-paradigm), Human Communication Research (interpersonal/HCR), New Media & Society (digital, more qualitative). If a sibling owns the contribution, recommend re-routing before polishing format.
  • Stop condition: do not give submission-ready advice until resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.

Output format

【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut
【Study type】experiment / survey-panel / content analysis / computational
【Route to】commres-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

版本历史

  • 1839142 当前 2026-07-05 12:38

同 Skill 集合

AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-author-response/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-related-work/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-review-process/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-submission/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-workflow/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-writing-style/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-experiments/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-related-work/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-submission/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-workflow/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-evidence-standards/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-literature-synthesis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-organizing-framework/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-proposal-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-revision/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-methods/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-theory-development/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-data-analysis/SKILL.md

元信息

文件数
0
版本
c82fe76
Hash
7dfbf612
收录时间
2026-07-05 12:38

首页 - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-08-04 21:15
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $访客地图$