Agent Skills
› brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
› the-international-journal-of-robotics-research
the-international-journal-of-robotics-research
GitHub用于评估机器人论文是否适合投稿IJRR。提供期刊定位、深度与通用性标准、IJRR与T-RO路由建议、拒稿启发式规则及重写指导，辅助作者进行 venue selection 和概念框架调整。
触发场景
作者指定目标为IJRR并需进行适配度检查
需要将具体系统演示重构为通用方法或原理
在IJRR（深度/通用性）与T-RO（完整性/验证）之间做选择
需要了解IJRR的录用标准及desk-reject风险
安装
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-international-journal-of-robotics-research -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "the-international-journal-of-robotics-research",
"description": "Use when targeting The International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR) or deciding whether a robotics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the longer-form conceptually-framed-and-general contribution bar, depth-and-generality rigor, the IJRR-vs-T-RO routing, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics."
}
The International Journal of Robotics Research (the-international-journal-of-robotics-research)
Journal positioning
The International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR), published by SAGE, is a
flagship archival venue for longer-form, conceptually framed robotics research:
foundational methods, extended treatments, and contributions whose value rests on
generality and depth rather than a single working demonstration. The defining
expectation is an idea developed thoroughly — formalized, analyzed, and evaluated
across conditions — that advances how the field thinks about a problem, not only a
system that performs one task. Compared with its sibling
ieee-transactions-on-robotics, IJRR favors the deeper, more general, more
conceptual treatment, while T-RO favors complete and tightly validated results;
route by whether the strength is generality-of-idea or completeness-of-validation.
This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace
the journal's current official author guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the
live IJRR/SAGE author information.
When to trigger
- The author names IJRR for a robotics manuscript with a foundational or conceptually general contribution and wants a fit/framing check.
- A result must be re-framed from "our system does X" into a general method or principle, developed and analyzed beyond a single demonstration.
- The author is choosing between IJRR and
ieee-transactions-on-roboticsby depth-and-generality vs. completeness-of-validation. - The author needs IJRR's depth/generality bar and desk-reject heuristics.
Scope & topic fit
- Foundational methods in planning, control, estimation, learning, and perception for robots, presented with generality and analysis.
- Manipulation, locomotion, and navigation when the contribution is a principle or framework that transfers beyond one platform or task.
- Algorithmic and theoretical robotics: complexity, guarantees, representations, and formal treatments grounded in robotic problems.
- Extended treatments that consolidate, generalize, or deepen a line of work into an archival reference.
- System and architecture contributions when the design embodies a generalizable concept, evaluated across conditions, not a one-off demo.
Method & evidence bar
- The central object is a general, well-developed idea: a formalization, method, or framework whose scope and limits are characterized, not a single tuned result.
- Evaluation should probe generality — across tasks, platforms, parameters, or conditions — and may combine analysis, simulation, and real-robot experiments.
- Analysis (assumptions, guarantees, complexity, failure modes) is expected where the contribution is methodological, supporting the claim of generality.
- Experiments matter, but a single impressive demonstration is not sufficient if the conceptual generality is not established and tested.
- Position the work in the broader arc of the field; the contribution should change how a problem is approached, not just report a better number.
- Reproducibility: enough detail (and ideally code/data and video) to let others build on the framework, per current policy.
Structure & house style
- SAGE long-form archival article; IJRR accommodates fuller development than a letters/short format — match the depth to that scope and re-check current article types and length policy on the live guide.
- The introduction frames the conceptual problem and the field-level gap, then states the general contribution; it situates the work in a broad intellectual context.
- The development is thorough: clear formalization, analysis, and a discussion of scope, assumptions, and limitations.
- Figures and tables support both the concept and its multi-condition evaluation; a supplementary video supports any hardware demonstration.
- Related work is substantive, reflecting the archival, reference-quality positioning.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the SAGE anchors, then cite the current IJRR author-guidelines page you checked. - Search the live site for "International Journal of Robotics Research submission guidelines" and follow the current SAGE/manuscript-system version.
- Re-check article types, length expectations, and the IJRR/SAGE manuscript format.
- Confirm data/code-availability, video, and reproducibility expectations.
- Re-check competing-interests, funding, author-contribution, and AI-use disclosure requirements, and open-access options.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- The contribution is a general, well-developed idea or framework, not a single tuned demonstration.
- Generality is established and tested across tasks/platforms/conditions, not asserted.
- Methodological claims are supported by analysis (assumptions, guarantees, complexity, failure modes).
- The work is situated in the broad arc of the field and changes how the problem is approached.
- Development depth and length fit IJRR's long-form archival format.
- Reproducibility detail (and ideally code/data/video) lets others build on the framework.
Common desk-reject triggers
- A single working system or demo with no generalization, analysis, or conceptual framing.
- Incremental result better suited to a shorter, tightly validated format than long-form archival.
- Method asserted to be general but evaluated on one task/platform only.
- Application paper where the robotics idea is incidental and not developed.
- Thin related work and shallow analysis inconsistent with reference-quality positioning.
Re-routing decision
- Complete, tightly validated single contribution →
ieee-transactions-on-robotics. - Control-theoretic result with guarantees as the core →
ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control/automatica. - Industrial-robot deployment with hardware-system focus →
ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics. - Medical/surgical-robotics imaging contribution →
ieee-transactions-on-medical-imaging. - Focused, timely result → a robotics letters venue or conference.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] The International Journal of Robotics Research
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest robotics subtopics>
[Conceptual contribution] <the general idea/framework in one line>
[Method/evidence] <is generality established and tested, clearing IJRR's depth bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Long-form archival article
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / format / data-code-video / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
版本历史
- 1839142 当前 2026-07-05 12:56
