devpsych-workflow

GitHub

发展心理学论文工作流路由器,根据研究设计(横断、纵向等)和阶段分发任务,涵盖从选题到投稿的全流程。

Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-workflow/SKILL.md brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

触发场景

启动新论文或不确定下一步 选择稿件长度层级 收到决定信需回复

安装

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-workflow -g -y
更多选项

非标准路径

npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-workflow -g -y

不安装直接使用

npx skills use brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills@devpsych-workflow

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-workflow -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "devpsych-workflow",
    "description": "Use when starting or navigating any Developmental Psychology (APA) manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing a manuscript length tier or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and by the developmental design (cross-sectional, longitudinal\/cohort, micro-genetic, experiment with minors); it dispatches, it does not draft content."
}

Developmental Psychology Workflow Router (devpsych-workflow)

The orchestrator for a Developmental Psychology submission. This APA journal publishes empirical work on development across the life span, and its defining demand is a credible claim about developmental change — age effects, within-person change, or trajectories — reported under APA 7th + JARS, with masked review and Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) expectations. The router makes sure the developmental claim, the design, and the open-science package are all handled, then dispatches.

When to trigger

  • Starting a new Developmental Psychology paper and unsure where to begin
  • Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
  • Choosing a length tier (brief report vs. larger report vs. multi-study/longitudinal report)
  • Returning with a decision letter (route to devpsych-rebuttal)

First question: what kind of developmental claim and design?

Situation Design Route note
Age differences at one time point Cross-sectional name the age/cohort confound early (devpsych-study-design)
Within-person change over time Longitudinal / cohort attrition + measurement invariance are load-bearing
Process of change in close-up Micro-genetic dense sampling; justify granularity
Causal manipulation with minors Experiment ethics/assent + age-appropriate task validity
Re-using a large panel (e.g., NICHD, ECLS) Secondary analysis declare provenance, derived measures, version

Routing map (stage → skill)

Idea / fit + age scope?            → devpsych-topic-selection
Developmental theory + hypotheses? → devpsych-theory-and-hypotheses
Where does it sit in the field?    → devpsych-literature-positioning
Design / power / invariance / age? → devpsych-study-design
Growth-curve / multilevel / SEM?   → devpsych-data-analysis
Trajectory exhibits (APA)?         → devpsych-tables-figures
APA 7th + Public Significance?     → devpsych-writing-style
Data/materials + preregistration?  → devpsych-open-science-and-transparency
How will it be judged (masked)?    → devpsych-review-process
Ready to submit (Editorial Mgr)?   → devpsych-submission
Got an R&R / decision?             → devpsych-rebuttal

Default order

topic-selection → theory-and-hypotheses → literature-positioning → study-design → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → open-science-and-transparency → review-process → submission → rebuttal

If the design is prospective and confirmatory, pull study-design and open-science-and-transparency forward so a preregistration and a sample-size justification exist before data collection.

Worked micro-example — routing a live project (illustrative)

A team has a three-wave accelerated longitudinal study of self-regulation (ages 4, 6, 8; some attrition), fitting growth curves, and a reviewer-anticipated worry about measurement invariance. The router walks them:

Claim:   within-person growth in effortful control, age 4→8.
Design:  longitudinal/cohort (accelerated) → invariance + attrition are central.
Entry:   not idea-stage; they are at design hardening + analysis.
Route:   study-design (invariance test plan; attrition/FIML; age-vs-cohort)
         → data-analysis (latent growth / multilevel; time coding)
         → tables-figures (spaghetti + mean-trajectory plot, CIs)
         → writing-style (APA 7th; Public Significance Statement)
         → open-science-and-transparency (data/scripts; prereg if confirmatory)
         → submission (masked preflight) ; on R&R → rebuttal.
Flag:    test longitudinal measurement invariance BEFORE interpreting change.

Stage-triage table (symptom → skill)

What the author says Stage Route to
"Is age difference enough, or do I need change?" fit devpsych-topic-selection
"Reviewer: is your construct the same at every age?" design/analysis devpsych-study-design + devpsych-data-analysis
"Cross-sectional age effect — but is it cohort?" design devpsych-study-design
"Where does the Public Significance Statement go?" writing devpsych-writing-style
"Do I need to share data and preregister?" transparency devpsych-open-science-and-transparency
"I have an R&R" revision devpsych-rebuttal

Routing pitfalls specific to this venue

  • Sending an age-comparison straight to devpsych-data-analysis without first separating age from cohort and confirming measurement invariance — the change claim collapses if the construct shifts.
  • Deferring devpsych-open-science-and-transparency; under TOP, deposits and a preregistration are far cheaper to build before data than to retrofit at acceptance.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating a cross-sectional age difference as developmental change without addressing cohort confounds
  • Interpreting trajectories before establishing longitudinal measurement invariance
  • Forgetting the Public Significance Statement (an APA requirement on the abstract page)
  • Ignoring masked-review anonymization in the manuscript or in shared links

Output format

【Stage】idea / theory / positioning / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut
【Design】cross-sectional / longitudinal-cohort / micro-genetic / experiment / secondary
【Route to】devpsych-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

版本历史

  • 1839142 当前 2026-07-05 12:51

同 Skill 集合

AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-author-response/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-related-work/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-review-process/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-submission/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-workflow/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-writing-style/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-experiments/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-related-work/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-submission/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-workflow/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-evidence-standards/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-literature-synthesis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-organizing-framework/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-proposal-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-revision/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-methods/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-theory-development/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-data-analysis/SKILL.md

元信息

文件数
0
版本
c82fe76
Hash
7fe96896
收录时间
2026-07-05 12:51

首页 - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-08-04 22:35
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $访客地图$