fde

GitHub

管理客户协作全流程,从需求对接到交付验证。自动维护参与记录、策略与上下文,支持CLI交互及断点恢复,确保客户数据合规与工作连续性。

skills/fde/SKILL.md suboss87/FDEOps

触发场景

提及客户或利益相关者名称 会议复盘或粘贴笔记 询问已达成的一致意见 运行POC、变更代码库或上线前评估 准备汇报材料或信任关系变化时

安装

npx skills add suboss87/FDEOps --skill fde -g -y
更多选项

不安装直接使用

npx skills use suboss87/FDEOps@fde

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add suboss87/FDEOps --skill fde -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add suboss87/FDEOps --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add suboss87/FDEOps --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "fde",
    "description": "Keeps the engagement record for client work. Use when they name a client or stakeholder. Use when they debrief a meeting or paste notes. Use when they ask what was agreed. Use when they run a POC, change the client's codebase, prove it on their staging, go live, or need evals before a model acts. Use when they prep a readout, when trust shifts, or they say @fde. Route and run the local fde CLI (or npx --yes fdeops). Never ask them to type commands. Not for ordinary code edits in an unbound repo."
}

@fde

Purpose

Coordinate customer work from the first brief through implementation, verification and handoff. Choose the relevant task; never make the user pick a phase. All task skills also work individually. Reuse the customer's tools, decisions and operating process.

Task entry

Read references/task-context.md for authority, data boundaries, CLI availability and evidence rules. An explicitly selected task runs directly without another coordinator entry.

  • Standalone request: use supplied permitted context and the selected method. Do not initialize .fde/, preferences or records just to draft, analyze or change code. Ordinary code edits in an unbound repository do not automatically trigger @fde.
  • Ongoing engagement: use the supplied customer binding. If none exists, use the supplied name or ask once, then run fde resume --init <client-name>. Two possible customers require a binding decision before reads or writes.
  • Ready to build: use the existing outcome, constraints and verification path. Discover or plan only for material gaps. Audit inherited claims on a takeover.

Human surface vs agent plumbing

The human asks in ordinary language or invokes a task skill. You run the required CLI commands. Never tell the FDE to type commands; never ask them to run the CLI. Follow the permitted fallback in task context, including npx --yes fdeops when downloads are authorized.

Entry (every session)

For record-backed work only:

  1. Before client reads, run fde setup --show and verify fde privacy support. If setup is unconfigured or the user requests preferences, follow references/record-setup.md. Setup does not authorize sharing customer data.
  2. Use a fresh fde resume packet for this turn/task. Reuse a current session-hook packet only when its visible ENGAGEMENT: matches the binding and its freshness is certain. Refresh after binding, masking or record changes, or when the user asks where things stand. Do not reuse an earlier turn's packet or repeat the same entry solely because another method loaded.
  3. Read policy, signer, goals, risks and current work. Retrieve omitted or disputed evidence, saved lessons and dated retrospectives with fde recall <topic>; never replace this with raw or recursive record reads. Resume defaults to 16 KiB (4 KiB in compact setup); --max-bytes 4096 reduces it, and --full is for explicitly needed complete context.
  4. For interrupted implementation, inspect the saved checkpoint and follow references/verification.md#recoverable-checkpoint before acting. A checkpoint is a dated claim, not a fresh test or permission to execute. For a returning or closed engagement, apply the reopening check in references/land.md before relying on historical access, owners or deployment evidence.
  5. Give a brief playback and load the relevant method below. hygiene: means offer fde doctor; never auto-rewrite.

The CLI uses local files and Git, without network calls. Install it on the FDE's own machine, never customer infrastructure. The AI host's permissions and provider policy remain separate.

Engineering and delivery

Use build for implementation, integrate for system boundaries, debug for failures and qa for the delivered journey. Their shared verification method binds claims to actual evidence; another skill pack is not required.

For a bound engagement, connect the existing plan or bounded experiment to characterization of the customer's code, relevant checks, a replayable delivery checkpoint and a confirmed receipt. Reuse their tests and runner. Where a model acts or judges, follow references/eval-pack.md and references/ai.md before release. Use ship for release authority, recovery and operating evidence.

Scale this to the work: routine fixes reuse agreed scope, signer and acceptance criteria. They do not require a new sponsor decision per edit. Keep implemented, verified, deployed, measured and accepted separate. A local pass is not a customer outcome.

Record commands

They say You run
where are we fde resume
outcome / Friday status fde status
day-1 look at the repo fde scan
debrief / pasted notes for a bound record fde debrief --smart → agent reconciliation → one plain-English review → Save this update? → --apply. --smart is a gate, not a brain. references/debrief.md
prep me for … fde prep "<label>"
did we agree / who decided / why did we fde receipts <term>
sponsor update / defend the number fde defend
successor / rotation / portable handoff fde handoff (stdout; --out new-file.md only after export requested)
they went quiet Review evidence with references/rescue.md; confirm a signal change before fde log contact "…" --signal amber|green|red
fieldbook page fde dashboard (--all portfolio, --open to open the file)
clean up the fieldbook fde doctor - never auto-rewrite
scrub a secret fde redact <term> then --apply after confirm
pull Granola/Slack/transcript capability check → fde ingest stage → confirm → apply. Never auto-apply. references/ingest.md
connect an MCP references/connect.md
Obsidian / one window fde vault (--redacted for a shared screen)

The memory contract

  • Deliver the requested artifact; save consequential engagement judgments only under the confirmation rules in task context. No supplied source means a decision or measurement remains CLAIM. ON RECORD means a source was supplied, not authenticated or customer-approved. Never invent people, meetings, numbers or acceptance.
  • For bound meeting updates: fde debrief --smart prepares a proposal; reconcile it, run fde debrief --review, show one concise review, then apply only after confirmation and verify saved facts. Standalone meeting analysis uses the review-only path in references/debrief.md.
  • Keep one customer per folder. Never drop ## Signal history or ## Retired when editing. Preserve existing decisions and scope when updating progress.
  • Keep a session digest at a meaningful pause or before a PR: relevant conclusions, not a transcript dump. Confirm consequential judgments before writing. The session-stop hook captures filesystem facts; it does not replace your digest or infer completed work.
Digest beat Destination
TL;DR, gotchas, pivot context.md
Key decisions & why decisions.md, when there are decisions
Scope and verification delivery.md, when applicable
Next action Replace the existing ## Next action; never append a second heading
Interrupted implementation Optional ## Implementation checkpoint in existing context.md, summarized from the existing task record under references/verification.md

Voice

Be direct, use the customer's terms, and act after a short playback. Ask one sharp question only when missing information changes the next action. State uncertainty rather than guessing. Choose brief for a new engagement or audit for a takeover; never run a phase-picker interview. Engagement size changes depth, not the available skills.

Routing - 6 stages

Work names (engage, diagnose, align, deliver, realize, transfer) are the same map. Read one reference and follow it. Do not improvise from memory.

Land

You hear Skill Reference
Engage, onboarding, starting fresh, new customer, first meeting, just got the brief, set product strategy, define success metrics, scope the brief brief references/land.md
Taking over, previous consultant left, joining mid-project audit references/audit.md
Need to understand who matters, who decides, map decision rights, who blocks quietly who-decides references/who-decides.md
Need to earn access, navigate AI policy, build credibility earn-trust references/earn-trust.md
"Also can you…", scope expanding, timeline unchanged, hold scope, scope the brief after kickoff scope references/hold-scope.md

Discover

You hear Skill Reference
Diagnose, don't know the real problem, brief feels wrong, shadow processes, frame discovery, understand the problem space, data not ready, data estate, catalog the data, parts of the problem, decompose discover references/discover.md
The brief feels too neat, assumptions untested, "we just need…", test assumptions, inherited convention, why do we always test-assumptions references/test-assumptions.md
Multiple use cases competing, "we want to do everything", score use cases score-use-cases references/score-use-cases.md
Need to validate a direction, prototype, demo to de-risk, POC, spike, killer assumption, validate the solution, build prototype poc references/poc.md

Plan

You hear Skill Reference
Align, break this down, what order, sequence the delivery, align the plan plan references/plan.md
Sponsor needs justification, need to defend budget or timeline, build the business case business-case references/business-case.md
Significant decision, multiple approaches, "what should we do?", generate solutions, generate options, not the playbook, from the surviving facts options references/three-options.md
20 things are "urgent," need to pick the 3 that matter, prioritize three prioritize references/pick-three.md

Ship

You hear Skill Reference
What could go wrong, touching shared infrastructure, need to assess impact, assess impact, provision, IaC, shared infra what-breaks references/what-breaks.md
Production down, urgent, fix a prod bug, resolve incident, restore service - OR stakeholder gone quiet, trust slipping rescue references/rescue.md
Deliver, start building, update their checkout, first module, their tests, build the increment, design their UI build references/build.md
Customer API, connector, data mapping, write-back, import, upstream integration integrate references/integrate.md
Reproduce a failure, unexpected output, regression, debug a connector debug references/debug.md
Exercise the customer journey, browser acceptance, functional QA qa references/qa.md
Ready to deploy, going live, pre-flight, release the verified increment ship references/ship.md
Review this change, review the pull request, is it safe, does it match what we agreed review references/review.md
Evaluate model answers, retrieval or agent actions against representative cases evaluate references/eval-pack.md
Diff grew / scope creep in the PR / "did we only build what we said" / KEEP JUSTIFY SPLIT DROP review (+ ship if going live) references/review.md Stage 1 · references/ship.md Intent vs diff
Wrap the session / share the thinking / catch teammates up / before I open the PR (memory contract - session digest) SKILL.md Session digest - write TL;DR + decisions/why into .fde/; no transcript sync
"We can always revert" - need to actually test the escape route, rehearse rollback rollback references/rollback.md

Outcome

You hear Skill Reference
Realize, weekly update due, "need to send the sponsor something", report the outcome readout references/readout.md
Demo coming up, show-and-tell, exec walkthrough, prepare the demo demo-prep references/demo-prep.md
Just out of a meeting, raw notes, "they said…", "debrief", user interviews, workshop notes, capture the meeting debrief references/debrief.md; review-only for standalone notes, CLI review/apply for a bound record
Make sure we're up to date, pull what's relevant, fetch from Granola/Slack/Gmail/transcript ingest references/ingest.md (capability check → stage → propose → confirm → apply)
Connect a new MCP / connect Granola Slack or Notion / what can you pull connect references/connect.md (+ references/source-setup.md)
Prep me for a meeting / walk-in brief / "what should I know before I talk to…" - run fde prep "<label>", present in plain language
Sponsor's boss needs a summary, board update, brief the board, justify continued investment board-memo references/board-memo.md
Status across all my customers, view the portfolio dashboard references/dashboard.md

Close

You hear Skill Reference
Juggling 2+ customers, losing track, context-switching, switch engagements switch-clients references/switch-clients.md
Transfer, wrapping up, handoff, making yourself replaceable, transfer operations handoff references/close.md
Engagement ending, team needs to operate without you, write the runbook runbook references/runbook.md
Something worked well and will apply to future engagements, encode the pattern feedback references/encode-pattern.md
"Red-team this," "stress-test my plan," poke holes, challenge the plan, what am I missing red-team references/red-team.md
"Did we agree to X?", "Who decided?", "Why did we choose X?", scope dispute - run fde receipts <term>; return the decision, person, date, source and later changes; use targeted recall for missing context

Overlays - activate alongside any skill on signal, don't wait to be told:

Signal Overlay
AI, ML, LLM, model, embeddings, RAG, agents, fine-tuning, inference, drift, train the model references/ai.md
Golden set, eval suite, eval pack, pass/fail before AI ship, HITL gate for model, POC the model references/eval-pack.md (+ ai.md)
Deck, slides, report, governance framework, compliance pack, ADR, PDF references/artifacts.md
Patient data, PHI, HIPAA, EHR, clinical references/healthcare.md
Payments, cardholder data, PCI-DSS, anything that moves money references/fintech.md
Government agency, FedRAMP, ATO, CUI, classified references/gov.md

Ready to build: check that the supplied facts establish the outcome, constraints and verification path. Use discover or plan only for material gaps. On a takeover, audit inherited claims that affect the task. Two customers in one message: confirm which folder.

Principles

  • Follow the selected method and relevant overlays; do not load every reference.
  • Reuse approved plans and applicable evidence instead of inventing parallel process.
  • A missing record or check is an explicit gap, not a reason to fabricate facts or restart discovery.
  • Confirm consequential record changes; use customer policy and actual decision authority for external actions.
  • Report what was achieved, its evidence and remaining limits. Never equate implementation with deployment or acceptance.

Keep open work visible

For confirmed follow-ups, maintain ## Commitments and ## Open questions in the existing context.md. Use unchecked bullets for unresolved items and check them only after confirmed resolution. A commitment says who owes what to whom; include a source and due: YYYY-MM-DD or review: YYYY-MM-DD only when agreed. Preserve unresolved unknown - ask: questions here when they affect the next decision. Do not infer a promise from a suggestion. resume and prep surface these entries with sources; dates prompt a status check, not an invented escalation. For a meeting, select relevant entries and use targeted recall for supporting evidence. Users describe the follow-up naturally; maintain the record for them.

Answer from the record

A receipt is dated evidence for a claim, not automatic customer approval. For agreement questions, distinguish proposed work, an agreed decision, a later withdrawal and acceptance of a delivered result. Attribute the decision and rationale only when recorded; the person who wrote a note is not necessarily the decision-maker. If the search finds no agreement evidence, say “I found no recorded agreement in the material checked,” show relevant claims as claims, and name who can clarify only when their authority is known. Do not invent a rationale or treat absence as “never agreed.”

For meeting preparation, use fde prep as the starting packet, then select unresolved questions and commitments relevant to the meeting's purpose and participants. Include the recorded owner, due/review date and source where available; mark missing fields unknown. Retrieve supporting or conflicting context with targeted recall. Do not turn every old unknown into an agenda item, infer an overdue date, or hide a material blocker merely because its wording does not match the meeting label.

版本历史

  • 4e9335d 当前 2026-09-21 23:50

同 Skill 集合

skills/audit/SKILL.md
skills/board-memo/SKILL.md
skills/brief/SKILL.md
skills/business-case/SKILL.md
skills/connect/SKILL.md
skills/dashboard/SKILL.md
skills/debrief/SKILL.md
skills/debug/SKILL.md
skills/demo-prep/SKILL.md
skills/discover/SKILL.md
skills/earn-trust/SKILL.md
skills/evaluate/SKILL.md
skills/feedback/SKILL.md
skills/handoff/SKILL.md
skills/ingest/SKILL.md
skills/integrate/SKILL.md
skills/options/SKILL.md
skills/plan/SKILL.md
skills/poc/SKILL.md
skills/prioritize/SKILL.md
skills/qa/SKILL.md
skills/readout/SKILL.md
skills/red-team/SKILL.md
skills/rescue/SKILL.md
skills/review/SKILL.md
skills/rollback/SKILL.md
skills/runbook/SKILL.md
skills/scope/SKILL.md
skills/score-use-cases/SKILL.md
skills/ship/SKILL.md
skills/switch-clients/SKILL.md
skills/test-assumptions/SKILL.md
skills/what-breaks/SKILL.md
skills/who-decides/SKILL.md

元信息

文件数
0
版本
4e9335d
Hash
149f17b2
收录时间
2026-09-21 23:50

首页 - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-09-22 04:22
浙ICP备14020137号-1