Agent Skillsmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills › hipaa-safeguards

hipaa-safeguards

GitHub

用于映射HIPAA安全规则并执行风险评估。根据角色、ePHI流向及现有控制措施,生成包含行政/物理/技术保障状态、强制性风险评估、BAA范围及优先整改计划的合规审计报告,确保PHI处理合法合规。

plugins/pm-compliance/skills/hipaa-safeguards/SKILL.md mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

触发场景

评估HIPAA保障措施 准备处理受保护健康信息(ePHI) 确定业务伙伴协议(BAA)范围 进行HIPAA合规性审查

安装

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill hipaa-safeguards -g -y
更多选项

非标准路径

npx skills add https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/plugins/pm-compliance/skills/hipaa-safeguards -g -y

不安装直接使用

npx skills use mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills@hipaa-safeguards

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill hipaa-safeguards -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "hipaa-safeguards",
    "description": "Map HIPAA Security Rule safeguards and run a risk analysis for systems handling PHI. Use when asked to become HIPAA-compliant, assess HIPAA safeguards, prepare for handling PHI\/ePHI, or scope a BAA. Produces a HIPAA assessment — the administrative\/physical\/technical safeguards with required-vs-addressable status, a risk analysis, BAA scope, and a prioritised remediation plan."
}

HIPAA Safeguards Skill

HIPAA's Security Rule is a list of safeguards for electronic protected health information (ePHI), split into administrative, physical, and technical — some required, some addressable (you must do them or document why an equivalent is reasonable). This skill maps your controls to that list, runs the risk analysis HIPAA mandates, and flags where you're exposed — so handling PHI is defensible, not hopeful.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • Your role — covered entity, or business associate (a vendor handling PHI for one). Both owe Security Rule safeguards.
  • The ePHI flow — where PHI is created, received, stored, transmitted, and who can access it.
  • Current safeguards — what's in place for access control, encryption, audit logging, backups, training.
  • Business associates — third parties touching PHI (each needs a BAA).

Output Format

HIPAA Assessment: [entity] ([covered entity / business associate])

1. ePHI inventory & flow — where PHI lives and moves; the systems in scope.

2. Safeguards — a table per category; status met / partial / gap, and required vs. addressable:

Category Safeguard Req/Addr Status Notes
Technical Encryption of ePHI at rest & in transit Addressable partial TLS yes; disk encryption pending
Administrative Security risk analysis Required gap Not yet performed
Physical Facility access controls Required met

3. Risk analysis — the required (§164.308(a)(1)) assessment: threats to ePHI, likelihood × impact, and the residual risk after controls. This is the control auditors check first and the one most often missing.

4. BAA scope — which business associates need a Business Associate Agreement, and what each must guarantee.

5. Remediation — prioritised gaps (required-and-gap first), owners, dates. For addressable items not implemented, the documented justification + alternative.

Programmatic Helper

scripts/hipaa_checklist.py (stdlib only) scores safeguard coverage and surfaces unmet required safeguards (the ones with no "addressable" escape hatch):

# safeguards.json: [{"category":"Technical","safeguard":"...","required":true,"status":"met|partial|gap"}, ...]
python3 scripts/hipaa_checklist.py safeguards.json
python3 scripts/hipaa_checklist.py safeguards.json --json

Quality Checks

  • A documented security risk analysis exists (or is the top remediation item) — it's required and foundational
  • Each safeguard is marked required vs. addressable, and addressable-not-done items have a written justification + alternative
  • Encryption of ePHI in transit and at rest is assessed explicitly
  • Every business associate has (or is flagged as needing) a BAA
  • Audit logging / access review for PHI access is covered

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not treat "addressable" as "optional" — you must implement it or document why an equivalent is reasonable; silence is a violation
  • Do not skip the risk analysis — it's explicitly required and the most-cited gap in OCR enforcement
  • Do not handle PHI through a vendor without a BAA — that alone is a breach
  • Do not present this as legal certification — flag that compliance counsel / a security assessor must validate, especially the risk analysis
  • Do not conflate HIPAA with SOC 2 or GDPR — overlapping controls, different legal requirements; map each separately

Based On

HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR §164.308–312) — administrative, physical, and technical safeguards + required risk analysis.

版本历史

  • a38bc30 当前 2026-07-05 11:13

同 Skill 集合

exports/openclaw/360-feedback-template/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/401k-plan-decoder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ab-test-planner/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ab-test-readout/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/accessibility-audit/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/account-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/acquirer-red-team/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ad-copy/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/aeo-optimizer/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agenda-or-cancel/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-design-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-hiring-panel/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-observability-spec/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-severance/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-spec/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agm-in-a-box/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-ethics-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-eval-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-feature-prd/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-product-canvas/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/air-quality/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/altitude-shifter/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ambiguity-resolver/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/analyst-relations-brief/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/announcement-card/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/api-docs-writer/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/api-test-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/api-versioning-strategy/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/apology-letter/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/architecture-decision-record/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/architecture-diagram/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/archive-strategy/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/assumption-bounty/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/async-update-format/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/auto-repair-estimate-decoder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/autopilot-charter/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/behavior-intervention-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/benefits-decoder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bennett-time-audit/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bid-tender-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-deck-narrative/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-game-designer/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-minutes/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-pre-read/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bom-cost-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bookkeeping-categorization/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/boolean-search-builder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/brag-doc/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/brainstorming/SKILL.md

元信息

文件数
0
版本
e4def4c
Hash
3258ff6a
收录时间
2026-07-05 11:13

首页 - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-08-01 20:30
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $访客地图$