Agent Skillsmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills › launch-tiering-framework

launch-tiering-framework

GitHub

根据产品发布的影响力、新颖性、就绪度等维度,评估并分配T1/T2/T3发布等级。输出评分依据、匹配的市场活动、负责人、时间线及轻量级检查清单,确保GTM资源与发布影响相匹配。

skills/launch-tiering-framework/SKILL.md mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

Trigger Scenarios

决定发布等级 规划与影响力匹配的市场推广活动 构建发布分级框架 评估发布就绪状态

Install

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill launch-tiering-framework -g -y
More Options

Use without installing

npx skills use mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills@launch-tiering-framework

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill launch-tiering-framework -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "launch-tiering-framework",
    "description": "Tier a product launch (T1\/T2\/T3) and scope the right go-to-market effort. Use when asked to decide a launch tier, right-size launch activities, build a launch tiering framework, or plan channels and effort proportional to a launch's impact. Produces a tiering recommendation with the scoring rationale, the activities and channels for that tier, owners, and a lightweight launch checklist."
}

Launch Tiering Framework Skill

Not every release deserves a full launch. This skill decides how big a launch should be, then scopes the go-to-market effort to match — so big bets get the push they deserve and minor updates don't burn the team or the audience's attention.

What This Skill Produces

  • A launch tier (T1 / T2 / T3) with the scoring rationale
  • The set of activities and channels appropriate to that tier
  • Owners and a timeline
  • A right-sized launch checklist and success metrics

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • What's launching — the feature/product and who it's for
  • Impact signals — revenue potential, strategic importance, audience reach, competitive pressure, customer demand
  • Novelty — incremental improvement vs new capability vs new product
  • Readiness — GA vs beta, docs, enablement, support readiness
  • Constraints — team bandwidth, date pressure, dependencies
  • Any house tiering definitions already in use (use them if provided)

Tiering Rubric

Score the launch on impact and novelty; the higher of the two typically sets the tier.

  • T1 — Major: new product or flagship capability; strategic; broad audience; competitive stakes. Full GTM.
  • T2 — Notable: meaningful new feature; matters to a segment; worth proactive comms. Moderate GTM.
  • T3 — Minor: incremental improvement, fix, or narrow feature. Low-effort, in-product + notes.

If readiness lags the tier the impact warrants, flag the gap rather than downgrading silently.

Process

  1. Score impact and novelty using the signals provided; note the reasoning.
  2. Assign the tier (higher of impact/novelty), and state what would move it up or down.
  3. Scope activities to the tier — don't over- or under-invest.
  4. Assign owners and a timeline across product, PMM, content, sales, support.
  5. Right-size the checklist and define how you'll measure success at that tier.

Output Format


Launch Tiering — [Launch name]

Recommended tier: [T1 / T2 / T3]

Scoring

Dimension Signal Read
Impact [revenue/strategic/reach/competitive/demand] [high/med/low]
Novelty [incremental / new capability / new product] [high/med/low]
Readiness [GA/beta · docs · enablement · support] [ready / gap]

Rationale: [why this tier] · Would change if: [what flips it]

Activities for [Tier]

Workstream Do Skip
Positioning/messaging [e.g. full narrative vs one-liner] [—]
Content [blog, video, launch post vs release notes only] [—]
Channels [press, email, social, in-app vs in-app only] [—]
Sales/CS enablement [kit + training vs FYI] [—]
Events [webinar/launch event vs none] [—]

Owners & Timeline

Workstream Owner Due
[Item] [role] [date]

Launch Checklist ([tier-sized])

  • [Only what this tier needs]

Success Metrics

  • [Tier-appropriate: awareness/adoption/pipeline/activation]

Quality Checks

  • The tier follows from explicit impact/novelty scoring
  • Activities match the tier — no full push for a T3, no silence for a T1
  • Readiness gaps are flagged, not hidden by downgrading
  • Every workstream has an owner and date
  • Success metrics fit the tier's ambition

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not launch everything at T1 — attention and effort are finite
  • Do not treat a strategic launch as T3 because the team is busy — flag the gap
  • Do not skip enablement on a tier that sales needs to sell
  • Do not measure a T3 with T1 metrics (or vice versa)
  • Do not ignore existing house tier definitions if provided

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "What launch tier should this feature be?"
  • "Right-size the go-to-market for our [feature] launch"
  • "Build a launch tiering framework for our team"
  • "Plan T2 launch activities and owners for [product]"

Version History

  • a38bc30 Current 2026-07-05 11:37

Same Skill Collection

exports/openclaw/360-feedback-template/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/401k-plan-decoder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ab-test-planner/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ab-test-readout/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/accessibility-audit/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/account-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/acquirer-red-team/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ad-copy/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/aeo-optimizer/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agenda-or-cancel/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-design-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-hiring-panel/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-observability-spec/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-severance/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-spec/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agm-in-a-box/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-ethics-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-eval-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-feature-prd/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-product-canvas/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/air-quality/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/altitude-shifter/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ambiguity-resolver/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/analyst-relations-brief/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/announcement-card/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/api-docs-writer/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/api-test-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/api-versioning-strategy/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/apology-letter/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/architecture-decision-record/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/architecture-diagram/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/archive-strategy/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/assumption-bounty/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/async-update-format/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/auto-repair-estimate-decoder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/autopilot-charter/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/behavior-intervention-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/benefits-decoder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bennett-time-audit/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bid-tender-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-deck-narrative/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-game-designer/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-minutes/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-pre-read/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bom-cost-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bookkeeping-categorization/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/boolean-search-builder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/brag-doc/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/brainstorming/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
e4def4c
Hash
2bc61813
Indexed
2026-07-05 11:37

- 위키
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-07-31 03:08
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $방문자$