weekly-review
GitHub用于定期审查任务完成状态、阻塞项及目标进度,基于证据生成下周工作计划。识别逾期与缺口,评估容量,提出优先级排序的产出物,并起草后续跟进消息,辅助个人效能管理。
触发场景
安装
npx skills add Prismer-AI/PrismerCloud --skill weekly-review -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "weekly-review",
"scope": "common",
"license": "MIT",
"category": "productivity",
"metadata": {
"upstream": "Hermes Agent skills\/productivity\/weekly-review-planning at 1a1f4a59e2",
"nativeReplaces": [
"weekly-review-planning"
]
},
"description": "Review commitments and stalled work from Prismer tasks and memory, then produce an evidence-based weekly plan with explicit coverage gaps."
}
Weekly Review
Resolve review period and timezone from the request/context. Use tasks, memory, and okr only where available and authorized. External calendars and inboxes are optional sources, never assumed capabilities.
- Read completed and active tasks, relevant decisions, goals and waiting items.
- Record outcomes, owner, deadline, blocker, last activity and source link. Silence is not evidence of completion.
- Identify overdue work, missing next actions, duplicates and conflicting states.
- Review next week's capacity only from available calendar/user evidence. Without it, state that capacity is unverified instead of inventing free hours.
- Propose a small set of outcomes ranked by deadline, consequence and dependency. Name deferred work and evidence gaps.
- Apply updates already authorized by the user, then read back changed records. Draft follow-up messages unless sending them was requested.
- Report wins, risks, waiting items, next-week outcomes, verified updates and gaps.
Do not create cron jobs or a recurring monitor merely because this skill ran. Scheduling is a separate explicit request handled through platform scheduling.
Coverage and planning detail
Declare the authoritative system when stores disagree. Inspect both the completed
week and the next 1-2 weeks for travel, preparation, deadlines and commitments.
Classify each capture item as next action, project, waiting, scheduled, someday,
reference, archive proposal or delete proposal; count unprocessed items. Consult
prismer-email-inbox-triage for thread-level email handling only when authorized.
For every waiting item identify who owes what, its supporting record/event/thread and a proposed review or follow-up date. Keep proposed dates separate from agreed deadlines. For every active project identify an outcome and next action or mark it paused/unresolved. Rank outcomes by consequence, deadline, dependency and effort; reserve slack rather than allocating all apparent free hours. Explicitly name deferred work. Return wins, overdue/at-risk work, waiting items, stalled projects, next-week outcomes/calendar constraints, proposed updates and coverage gaps.
Calendar holds, rescheduling, archive/delete and messages each need authorization covering that effect. A request to run a review alone is not a scheduling request.
版本历史
- f4c4a0c 当前 2026-10-19 02:42


