Agent SkillsJuliusBrussee/caveman › caveman-evidence-review

caveman-evidence-review

GitHub

只读审查Caveman Cloud数据,分析LLM成本、质量指标及工作流表现。通过对比追踪和报告定位异常与优化机会,提供基于证据的成本节省和质量变更分析。

skills/caveman-evidence-review/SKILL.md JuliusBrussee/caveman

触发场景

查询LLM费用详情 分析模型质量或延迟变化 审查特定工作流的执行痕迹 查看Cave Score或验证的节省金额

安装

npx skills add JuliusBrussee/caveman --skill caveman-evidence-review -g -y
更多选项

不安装直接使用

npx skills use JuliusBrussee/caveman@caveman-evidence-review

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add JuliusBrussee/caveman --skill caveman-evidence-review -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add JuliusBrussee/caveman --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add JuliusBrussee/caveman --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "caveman-evidence-review",
    "description": "Review Caveman Cloud evidence read-only: costs, Cave Score, Cave Plan, workflows, traces, latency, errors, compression, routing, and verified savings. Use when the user asks what Caveman found, where LLM spend goes, why cost or quality changed, which workflows need attention, or asks for a trace or analytics review. Prefer Caveman MCP tools; fall back to CLI JSON."
}

Review Caveman evidence

Act as a read-only operator. Build conclusions from current Caveman data, not from repository guesses. Never start, approve, cancel, or roll back an experiment from this skill.

Hard rules

  1. Keep these buckets separate:
    • measured provider-complete list-price cost;
    • inferred daily headroom;
    • verified ledger savings;
    • evidence cost. Never add or relabel them.
  2. Do not fetch prompt, completion, tool, or artifact payloads unless the user explicitly asks for payload review. Metadata, spans, timing, models, token counts, status, and optimizer attribution are enough for the default review.
  3. Scope every read to the project selected by Caveman context. Never supply an organization id.
  4. Empty results are evidence of no current signal, not zero cost or zero risk.
  5. Cite trace ids and exact time windows used. Do not claim a cause from an aggregate alone.

Step 1 — Load context

Prefer MCP:

caveman_context {}

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud whoami
caveman cloud projects list

Stop if login or project selection is missing. Ask the user to run caveman login or select a project; never guess.

Step 2 — Establish baseline

Use caveman_report for:

  • overview
  • costs
  • score
  • workflows
  • verified_savings

Then use caveman_plan for ranked daily headroom. If question is narrow, skip unrelated reports. Read shortest set that can answer it.

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud costs
caveman cloud score
caveman cloud plan --json

State report window and basis before interpreting direction.

Step 3 — Test the leading explanation with traces

Use caveman_trace_search. Choose a bounded window and closed filters: workflow, agent, model, provider, error code, runtime mode, cache status, optimization id, status class, token/cost/latency bounds, compression, or monitor verdict.

Useful groupings:

  • workflow — find jobs driving cost or failures;
  • model — compare model mix;
  • session — isolate retry or loop behavior;
  • ungrouped — identify exact traces.

Compare a suspect cohort with a control cohort or earlier bounded window. Do not infer causality from one expensive trace.

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud traces search \
  --workflow <slug> \
  --from <RFC3339> \
  --to <RFC3339> \
  --sort total_cost_usd \
  --dir desc \
  --limit 25

Step 4 — Inspect representative traces

Call caveman_trace_get for a small number of high-signal trace ids. Inspect request and span metadata, latency, status, token counts, cache state, applied optimizers, and model route. Keep payload retrieval off.

CLI fallback:

caveman cloud traces show <trace-id> --spans

Step 5 — Report

Use this shape:

## Caveman evidence review

Scope: <project> · <from> to <to>
Measured cost: <value and basis>
Verified savings: <ledger value, kept separate>
Inferred headroom: <per-day band, kept separate>

Findings:
1. <finding> — <aggregate evidence> — traces <ids>
2. <finding> — <aggregate evidence> — traces <ids>

Unproven:
- <plausible explanation lacking a control, trace, or eval>

Next read-only check:
- <one bounded query>

Possible action:
- <proposal only; use caveman-manage for read-only lifecycle review and safety gate>

If data is missing, name missing signal and stop at strongest supported statement. Never turn a catalog subtotal into an invoice or an experiment result into verified savings.

版本历史

  • 12aa8cc 当前 2026-08-16 08:54

同 Skill 集合

plugins/caveman/skills/caveman-compress/SKILL.md
plugins/caveman/skills/caveman-stats/SKILL.md
plugins/caveman/skills/caveman/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-commit/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-compress/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-discover/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-explore/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-help/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-learn/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-manage/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-optimize/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-review/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-setup/SKILL.md
skills/caveman-stats/SKILL.md
skills/caveman/SKILL.md
skills/investigate-first/SKILL.md
skills/lean-build/SKILL.md
skills/migration/SKILL.md
skills/safe-refactor/SKILL.md
skills/surgical-patch/SKILL.md
skills/verify-and-stop/SKILL.md
plugins/caveman/skills/cavecrew/SKILL.md
skills/cavecrew/SKILL.md

元信息

文件数
0
版本
17f9f2e
Hash
239bb91f
收录时间
2026-08-16 08:54

首页 - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-08-28 15:08
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $访客地图$