Run the Omnigent load test

Drives dev/loadtest/ end to end: collect inputs → run → read summary.md → explain the latencies. Each Locust user is a real omnigent host that registers over the host tunnel, creates host-bound sessions, and drives real multi-turn conversations — every turn is a genuine post→idle loop through the host's runner, with the LLM mocked (zero latency) so the numbers are Omnigent's own overhead. -u N scales the number of hosts.

It boots its own local stack (server + mock LLM), so there is no server to point at, and it runs from a repo checkout only. For single-request latency micro-benchmarks (not concurrency), that is a different tool: dev/benchmarks/.

1. Ensure deps (repo checkout)

pip install -e '.[loadtest,dev,agents-sdk]'   # or: uv sync --extra loadtest --extra dev --extra agents-sdk

Run with that same interpreter (e.g. .venv/bin/python), from the repo root.

2. Gather inputs

Ask the user (AskUserQuestion when several are unknown); all have defaults.

Capacity caveat — say this to the user if they ask for large N: turns run on real host + runner subprocesses, so N hosts × M sessions = N×M runner processes on this box. It is capacity-limited by design (real turns, not faked). Start at --users 2 --sessions-per-user 1 --turns-per-session 2 --run-time 40s to confirm the stack boots (~10-30s), then ramp to a few dozen hosts at most. At high N the load box saturates before the server (Locust warns about CPU).

3. Run

python dev/loadtest/run.py \
    --users <N> --spawn-rate <R> --run-time <T> \
    --sessions-per-user <S> --turns-per-session <TU>

It boots the stack, prints the server URL + registered agent, runs Locust, and writes dev/loadtest/results/omnigent_load_test-<timestamp>/.

4. Read and explain

Read the summary.md and relay it. Focus on:

• Outcome / failures first. Exit 0 + 0 failures = PASS. Non-zero failures are the headline — check console.log and, for a host that failed to register, the per-host results/.../host-workspaces/<name>/host.log. At high N, failures usually mean the load box saturated, not the server.
• turn — the headline latency: one full post→idle agent turn on a host's runner (mocked LLM), so it is Omnigent's per-turn overhead. It grows across a conversation as history accumulates, so a rising p95/p99 with larger --turns-per-session is expected and is the interesting signal.
• host online — host tunnel registration cost; session create — the host-bound create; Ops/s — aggregate throughput at this concurrency.

If failures appeared or the tail looks high, suggest a concrete next step (lower N if the load box is saturated, raise --turns-per-session to study history growth, lengthen --run-time for steady state, or check server logs/metrics).

Notes

• Scenario file: dev/loadtest/omnigent_load_test.py; driver + report: dev/loadtest/run.py. Full reference: dev/loadtest/README.md.