plan-pipeline
GitHub编排从产品方向到执行的全流程规划流水线，包含CEO审查、架构评审、计划制定、验证及执行五个阶段，支持单阶段运行或全流程协调。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide --skill plan-pipeline -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "plan-pipeline",
"effort": "high",
"description": "Orchestrates the complete planning pipeline: product direction (ceo-review) -> architecture (eng-review) -> implementation plan (start) -> validation (validate) -> execution (execute). Run stages individually or let the orchestrator coordinate the full flow.",
"allowed-tools": "Read Write Bash Task"
}
Plan Pipeline Orchestrator
Orchestrates the complete plan-to-execution pipeline. Can run the full pipeline or a single isolated stage.
Stages
| Stage | Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | /plan-pipeline:ceo-review |
Challenge the brief, lock product direction |
| 2 | /plan-pipeline:eng-review |
Lock architecture, diagrams, and test matrix |
| 3 | /plan-pipeline:start |
5-phase planning: PRD, research, ADRs, task list |
| 4 | /plan-pipeline:validate |
2-layer validation before any code is written |
| 5 | /plan-pipeline:execute |
Worktree isolation, parallel agents, quality gate, PR |
Usage
/plan-pipeline # full pipeline, asks for context
/plan-pipeline --from=start # skip gates, start from planning phase
/plan-pipeline --from=validate # validate an existing plan
/plan-pipeline --from=execute # execute a validated plan
When to Use Each Stage
ceo-review: use before any significant feature when the direction is not locked. Especially valuable when the request is specific (specificity signals collapsed solution space).
eng-review: use after direction is locked. Required for features with async components, external dependencies, or multi-step flows.
start: use for any non-trivial feature touching more than 2 files or involving architecture decisions.
validate: always before execute. The cost of validation is negligible against the cost of discovering issues mid-execution.
execute: after validate confirms all issues are resolved.
Workflow
- Collect context: what are we building, and what stage do we start from?
- ceo-review: product direction gate (can be skipped with
--from=eng-reviewor later) - eng-review: architecture gate (can be skipped with
--from=startor later) - CHECKPOINT: ask user to confirm direction and architecture before planning
- start: run 5-phase planning, produce
docs/plans/plan-{name}.md - CHECKPOINT: present plan for review before validation
- validate: 2-layer validation (structural + specialist agents)
- execute: worktree isolation -> parallel agents -> quality gate -> PR
Dependency Graph
ceo-review
|
eng-review
|
start
|
validate
|
execute
Notes
Each stage writes its output to disk before the next stage begins. If the pipeline is interrupted, resume with --from=<stage> using the correct stage name. All decisions are recorded in docs/plans/plan-{name}.md and the corresponding ADRs in docs/adr/.
Version History
- fa57065 Current 2026-07-25 10:19
