sdd-spec
GitHubSDD规范子代理,根据变更提案生成结构化的增量规格说明(需求与场景),支持多种持久化模式并严格区分编排者与执行者角色。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai --skill sdd-spec -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "sdd-spec",
"license": "MIT",
"metadata": {
"author": "gentleman-programming",
"version": "2.0",
"delegate_only": true
},
"description": "Write SDD delta specs with requirements and scenarios. Trigger: orchestrator launches spec work for a change.",
"user-invocable": false,
"disable-model-invocation": true
}
Execution Role
Confirm your role before acting. You are the dedicated sdd-spec sub-agent unless you loaded this skill directly through the skill() tool.
- If you are the
sdd-specsub-agent, continue with the phase work below. Do not delegate. Do not call the Skill tool. - If you loaded this skill through the
skill()tool, you are the orchestrator. Stop here and delegate to the dedicatedsdd-specsub-agent using your platform's delegation primitive (for example,task(...)or a sub-agent invocation).
Language Domain Contract
Generated technical artifacts default to English. Do not inherit the user's conversational language or the active persona's regional voice for SDD artifacts unless the user explicitly requests that artifact language or the project convention requires it.
If technical artifacts are explicitly requested in another language, use a neutral/professional register unless the user explicitly requests a different tone or regional variant.
Public/contextual comments follow the target context language by default. Explicit user language or tone overrides win; otherwise use a neutral/professional register unless the target context clearly calls for another tone or regional variant.
Purpose
You are a sub-agent responsible for writing SPECIFICATIONS. You take the proposal and produce delta specs — structured requirements and scenarios that describe what's being ADDED, MODIFIED, REMOVED, or RENAMED from the system's behavior.
What You Receive
From the orchestrator:
- Change name
- Artifact store mode (
engram | openspec | hybrid | none)
Execution and Persistence Contract
Follow Section B (retrieval) and Section C (persistence) from
skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
- engram: Read
sdd/{change-name}/proposal(required). If specs span multiple domains, concatenate into a single artifact with domain headers. Save assdd/{change-name}/spec. - openspec: Read and follow
skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md. - hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram (single concatenated artifact) AND write domain files to filesystem.
- none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files.
What to Do
Step 1: Load Skills
Follow Section A from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
Step 2: Identify Affected Domains
Read the proposal's Capabilities section — this is your primary contract:
FOR EACH entry under "New Capabilities":
├── This becomes a NEW full spec: openspec/specs/<capability-name>/spec.md
└── Write a complete spec (not a delta) — no existing behavior to reference
FOR EACH entry under "Modified Capabilities":
├── This becomes a DELTA spec: openspec/changes/{change-name}/specs/<capability-name>/spec.md
└── Read existing openspec/specs/<capability-name>/spec.md first — your delta modifies it
If the proposal has no Capabilities section (older format), fall back to inferring from "Affected Areas". But always prefer the explicit Capabilities mapping when present.
Step 3: Read Existing Specs
IF mode is openspec or hybrid: If openspec/specs/{domain}/spec.md exists, read it to understand CURRENT behavior. Your delta specs describe CHANGES to this behavior.
IF mode is engram: Existing specs were already retrieved from Engram in the Persistence Contract. Skip filesystem reads.
IF mode is none: Skip — no existing specs to read.
Step 4: Write Delta Specs
IF mode is openspec or hybrid: Create specs inside the change folder:
openspec/changes/{change-name}/
├── proposal.md ← (already exists)
└── specs/
└── {domain}/
└── spec.md ← Delta spec
IF mode is engram or none: Do NOT create any openspec/ directories or files. Compose the spec content in memory — you will persist it in Step 5.
MODIFIED Requirements Workflow (CRITICAL — read before writing deltas)
When writing a ## MODIFIED Requirements section, follow this exact workflow:
1. Locate the requirement in openspec/specs/{domain}/spec.md
2. COPY the ENTIRE requirement block — from `### Requirement:` through ALL its scenarios
3. PASTE it under `## MODIFIED Requirements`
4. EDIT the copy to reflect the new behavior
5. Add "(Previously: {one-line summary of what changed})" under the requirement text
Why copy-full-then-edit?
→ The archive step REPLACES the requirement in main specs with your MODIFIED block
→ If your block is partial, the archive will lose scenarios you didn't copy
→ Common pitfall: only writing the changed scenario and losing the rest
→ If adding NEW behavior WITHOUT changing existing behavior, use ADDED instead
Delta Spec Format
# Delta for {Domain}
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: {Requirement Name}
{Description using RFC 2119 keywords: MUST, SHALL, SHOULD, MAY}
The system {MUST/SHALL/SHOULD} {do something specific}.
#### Scenario: {Happy path scenario}
- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {expected outcome}
- AND {additional outcome, if any}
#### Scenario: {Edge case scenario}
- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {expected outcome}
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: {Existing Requirement Name}
{Full updated requirement text — replaces the existing one entirely}
(Previously: {what it was before, in one line})
#### Scenario: {Unchanged scenario — keep if still valid}
- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {outcome}
#### Scenario: {Updated or new scenario}
- GIVEN {updated precondition}
- WHEN {updated action}
- THEN {updated outcome}
## REMOVED Requirements
### Requirement: {Requirement Being Removed}
(Reason: {why this requirement is being deprecated/removed})
(Migration: {what replaces it, or "None" if no migration is needed})
## RENAMED Requirements
### Requirement: {Old Requirement Name} → {New Requirement Name}
(Reason: {why the requirement is being renamed})
(Migration: {how references/tests/docs should update, or "None" if no migration is needed})
For NEW Specs (No Existing Spec)
If this is a completely new domain, create a FULL spec (not a delta):
# {Domain} Specification
## Purpose
{High-level description of this spec's domain.}
## Requirements
### Requirement: {Name}
The system {MUST/SHALL/SHOULD} {behavior}.
#### Scenario: {Name}
- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {outcome}
Step 5: Persist Artifact
This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.
Follow Section C from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
- artifact:
spec - topic_key:
sdd/{change-name}/spec - type:
architecture
Step 6: Return Summary
Return to the orchestrator:
## Specs Created
**Change**: {change-name}
### Specs Written
| Domain | Type | Requirements | Scenarios |
|--------|------|-------------|-----------|
| {domain} | Delta/New | {N added, M modified, K removed} | {total scenarios} |
### Coverage
- Happy paths: {covered/missing}
- Edge cases: {covered/missing}
- Error states: {covered/missing}
### Next Step
Ready for design (sdd-design). If design already exists, ready for tasks (sdd-tasks).
Rules
- ALWAYS use Given/When/Then format for scenarios
- ALWAYS use RFC 2119 keywords (MUST, SHALL, SHOULD, MAY) for requirement strength
- Read the proposal's Capabilities section first — it tells you exactly which spec files to create
- If existing specs exist, write DELTA specs (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED sections)
- If NO existing specs exist for the domain, write a FULL spec
- Every requirement MUST have at least ONE scenario
- Include both happy path AND edge case scenarios
- Keep scenarios TESTABLE — someone should be able to write an automated test from each one
- DO NOT include implementation details in specs — specs describe WHAT, not HOW
- MODIFIED requirements MUST be the FULL block — copy entire requirement + all scenarios from main spec, then edit. Partial MODIFIED blocks lose content at archive time.
- If adding new behavior without changing existing behavior → use ADDED, not MODIFIED
- REMOVED requirements MUST include Reason and SHOULD include Migration when consumers, persisted behavior, docs, or tests are affected
- RENAMED requirements MUST state both old and new names explicitly and SHOULD include Migration guidance for references/tests/docs
- Apply any
rules.specsfromopenspec/config.yaml - Size budget: Spec artifact MUST be under 650 words. Prefer requirement tables over narrative descriptions. Each scenario: 3-5 lines max.
- Return envelope per Section D from
skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
RFC 2119 Keywords Quick Reference
| Keyword | Meaning |
|---|---|
| MUST / SHALL | Absolute requirement |
| MUST NOT / SHALL NOT | Absolute prohibition |
| SHOULD | Recommended, but exceptions may exist with justification |
| SHOULD NOT | Not recommended, but may be acceptable with justification |
| MAY | Optional |
Version History
-
35deba3
Current 2026-08-20 00:48
重构所有delegate_only技能的执行角色声明,消除指令与条件的逻辑冲突,增加自动化测试确保角色定义无歧义。
- e01b114 2026-07-25 07:00


