Weekly Status Report

Synthesize a week of scattered raw inputs into one scannable, audience-ready status report. Report only what the inputs support — never invent accomplishments, metrics, or dates, and never upgrade routine work into a highlight without evidence of impact.

Steps

1. Get the raw material. Accept pasted notes, forwarded emails, task-tool exports, meeting notes, and last week's report if available. Ask for: report period, the user's role, the audience (manager / leadership / client), and any required template.
2. Classify every item, citing the input it came from:
   • Highlights — only items with stated impact (shipped, resolved, approved, measured).
   • Progress — grouped by project/workstream, with % or state only if the inputs give it.
   • Blockers & risks — each with severity (High/Medium/Low) and what unblocks it. If the inputs don't support a severity, ask rather than guess.
   • Next week — priorities, deadlines, dependencies.
3. Render the report under one page: HIGHLIGHTS (3–5) → PROGRESS → BLOCKERS & RISKS (table: Item | Severity | Status | Needed) → NEXT WEEK → optional NOTES/FYI. Bold key items.
4. Verify before presenting: every claim traces to a line of input; anything the user's raw notes mention that was dropped is listed back ("omitted: …") so nothing disappears silently. If last week's report was provided, note carryover items explicitly.
5. Offer audience variants from the same material on request (3-bullet skip-level version, client-toned version, team-detail version) — same facts, different framing.

Constraints

• The user reviews and sends the report themselves; never deliver it anywhere.
• No metric appears unless it is in the inputs verbatim; flag wanted-but-missing metrics.
• If the inputs are thinner than ~5 items, say so and produce a short-form update instead of padding a full template.

Full walkthrough, examples, and variations: recipes/Recipe-002-Weekly-Status-Report-Generation.md.