mergers-and-acquisitions
GitHub指导并购全流程,涵盖立项论证、目标筛选、估值建模、尽职调查及整合规划。旨在规范商业思维,识别风险,避免盲目交易,确保收购后价值实现与业务融合。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add cbrock84/headcount --skill mergers-and-acquisitions -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "mergers-and-acquisitions",
"description": "Runs corporate development — deal thesis, target screening, valuation framing, diligence, and integration planning. Use this when considering an acquisition or being approached about one, when evaluating build-versus-buy at company scale, when running or reviewing diligence, or when planning how an acquired business will actually be integrated."
}
Mergers and acquisitions
Deal execution requires qualified legal, tax, and accounting advisers. This structures the commercial thinking and identifies what needs specialist work; it does not substitute for it.
The thesis comes first, and in writing
Before looking at any target: what would an acquisition get us that we cannot build or partner our way to, and why is buying better?
Legitimate theses are specific — a capability that would take three years to build, access to a customer base we cannot reach, consolidation economics in a fragmenting market, a team with scarce expertise.
Illegitimate theses, all common: growth for its own sake, defensive panic, the target became available, and the belief that two struggling businesses combine into a healthy one.
Write the thesis before the target. A thesis reverse-engineered to fit an available company will justify anything.
Screening
Score candidates against the thesis, not against how impressive they are. The best target is frequently the boring one that fits precisely.
Assess cultural and operating-model fit early rather than as a soft afterthought. Integration failure is the most common way deals destroy value, and its causes are visible before signing — incompatible decision-making, different customer commitments, a founder who will not stay.
Valuation framing
Two numbers matter and they are different: what it is worth to you given the synergies you can actually realize, and what you would pay, which must be lower.
Be brutal about synergies. Cost synergies are real and estimable; revenue synergies are usually optimistic and rarely arrive on schedule. Model the deal without revenue synergies and see whether it still works — if it only works with them, it probably does not work.
Name your walk-away price before negotiating, and treat it as binding. Deal momentum is a powerful force and it is not evidence.
Diligence
Commercial diligence answers whether the thesis is true: are the customers real, is the retention as claimed, does the growth come from where they say. Financial, legal, and technical diligence run alongside with specialists.
The questions most often skipped and most often fatal: what is the customer concentration, what happens to the key people at close, what liabilities transfer, and what is running on infrastructure or contracts nobody has documented.
Diligence exists to falsify the thesis. Diligence run to confirm it will confirm it.
Integration
Plan it before signing, not after. Decide in advance: what integrates, what stays separate, who runs it, and what the first hundred days look like.
The predictable value destroyers are attrition of the people you bought, customer churn during transition, and a stalled integration that leaves two of everything indefinitely. Each is foreseeable and each is planned around, or it is not.
Never
- Proceed with a thesis that changed to fit the target.
- Treat the signed deal as the finish line. It is the start of the part that determines whether it worked.
Version History
- d58a7ee Current 2026-09-02 21:04


