cc-update
GitHub标准化更新 Claude Code CLI 版本的流程,涵盖版本评估、依赖检查及部署。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI --skill cc-update -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "cc-update",
"description": "Update Claude Code (the CC CLI \/ \"clog code\") to a new version, or bump the pinned CC version. Use when the user asks to update Claude Code, bump the CC pin, evaluate a new CC release, or says \"clog code update\". Routes to the canonical, standardized process in docs\/reference\/cc-compatibility.md — do NOT re-derive the update mechanism by grepping every time. Do NOT use for general \"what changed in CC\" trivia with no intent to update."
}
CC Update — start from the canonical source, don't rediscover
Genesis's Claude Code update process is fully standardized. This skill exists so a session executes that process instead of re-deriving it (grep archaeology every time). If you find yourself hunting for where the pin lives or how the host updates, STOP and read the doc.
Authoritative source — read these FIRST
docs/reference/cc-compatibility.md→ §Updating Claude Code (host + container) (the exact steps) and §CC Update Evaluation Checklist (the 8-lens impact eval).- The pin is the single source of truth:
CC_VERSION(+NODE_MAJOR) inscripts/lib/cc_version.sh.
The process in one breath — step numbers MATCH §Updating Claude Code in the doc
Deliberately the same numbering in both files: "step 4" means the same thing in each. The doc is authoritative for detail; this is the one-breath version. If a number here disagrees with the doc, the doc wins — and that disagreement is a bug worth fixing rather than working around.
Pick the target before anything else. npm view @anthropic-ai/claude-code version gives
latest; use an explicit older version if you are deliberately not chasing latest. Every step below
is defined over (pinned, target], so nothing can begin until target is fixed — and re-picking it
later restarts the procedure (step 5).
⛔ GATE — FULL CHANGELOG READ. MANDATORY, NO EXCEPTIONS. (part of step 1, before any triage)
Read EVERY release entry in
(pinned, target]IN FULL before step 1's triage. No pin bump proceeds without this.Fetch it fresh — nothing in Genesis maintains a changelog cache:
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anthropics/claude-code/main/CHANGELOG.md -o ~/tmp/cc_changelog.md(mkdir -p ~/tmpfirst —curl -fwill not create it.) That path is a scratch copy, NOT a recon-pulled cache. Before reading, confirm the file CONTAINS a## <target>heading (grep -c '^## <target>$') — a stale copy fails exactly that, which is how it would otherwise pass unnoticed while the whole new range goes unread. Do NOT also require the FIRST heading to equal the target: under the mid-soak rule you may deliberately finish on a targetlatesthas already passed, and equality could never be satisfied by any re-fetch.If the target released hours ago its heading may not be in
main's CHANGELOG.md yet — the one case no re-fetch fixes. Cover the tail from the GitHub release bodies, but enumerate what is missing first:gh release viewreads ONE release, sogh release view v<target>alone under-reads whenever more than one release in(pinned, target]is absent, and the gate closes over releases nobody read.gh release list --repo anthropics/claude-code --limit 60 --json tagName -q '.[].tagName', keep the tags in range with no## <version>heading in the file, thengh release view <tag>for EACH. Say in the durable row which source covered which releases.Scale:
(2.1.218, 2.1.246]measured 25 releases / ~88KB. The load-bearing item can sit anywhere, including deep inside the newest release.The analyzer is a TRIAGE SUMMARY, never a substitute. It prioritises; it does not discharge the gate.
Record it as a DURABLE row, not a chat line — opened BEFORE, closed AFTER.
session_ledger_addalways creates an open row, and its own return message says it "will re-inject into every post-compaction window until closed" (session_charter_tools.py::_impl_session_ledger_add). So a row added after declaring the gate done is a permanent false open item in charter counts, compaction injections and repo-pulse matching. Open it, do the read, then close it:resp = session_ledger_add(session_id=<this session>, text="CC changelog gate: reading (2.1.X, 2.1.Y] from <source>") # resp is a DICT — the id is resp["id"], not resp itself. # session_id is required, but a missing one returns {"error": …} rather than raising: # CHECK the response, or you will proceed believing a row exists that does not. …the read… session_ledger_update(item_id=resp["id"], status="done", evidence="read in full from <source>, <date>; <N> releases covered")The row is session-scoped, so across a 2–3 day soak the session that opens the PR is not the one that ran the gate. What makes the gate checkable later is the carry-over: a
CC-Gate-Changelog:trailer in the PR body plus the §Version History clause — see §Gate receipts indocs/reference/cc-compatibility.mdfor both receipts and what their absence means. The pin-receipt check blocks a pin-forward PR that is missing either — at MERGE time, where the body that actually merges is the one read. Thecc-pin-receiptsCI job runs the same checker advisorily and never fails a build. For rows added from 2026-08-26 onward, a Version-History row with no "changelog read" clause means the gate was not run — treat that as blocking at merge.Delegation is allowed — with the SAME context and rigor, never a naive "summarize this." Brief the sub-agent with §Delegating the full changelog read below, then adversarially spot-check its load-bearing findings against ground truth. A delegated review is not a rubber-stamp.
Origin (2026-08-26). A session re-targeted 245→246 off the headline delta and let the changelog-reading analyzer stand in for actually reading the changelog. The cause was mechanical, not just human: on
mainthe analyzer fetches only the newest 5 GitHub releases, keeps just thenewversion's body, and truncates it at 1000 chars — v2.1.246's body is ~9.3KB, so it saw the first ~8 of ~60 bullets and structurally could not surface the rest. The later full read found real Genesis-relevant 246 items the triage had missed: subagentmaxTurnsnow returning partial output,-p --continue/--resumeplan-mode resume, and a--strict-mcp-configstartup-hang fix that lands directly on Guardian Diagnosis.
-
Evaluate — intake, the ⛔ GATE above, then triage. Intake, never from scratch:
memory_recall+docs/reference/cc-compatibility.md§Known Issues / §Version History +npm view @anthropic-ai/claude-code@<target> engines.node+ a quick community sweep (Reddit/forums) for regressions the changelog omits. Triage:recon_cc_update_check(old, new)MCP (backed bysrc/genesis/recon/cc_update_analyzer.py). Know its real coverage: today it fetches only the newest 5 GitHub releases, matches the target version's tag, and truncates that body at 1000 chars — so on a multi-release jump it sees a fraction of ONE release, or NOTHING at all once the TARGET's own tag ages out of the newest 5. That is likely mid-soak: step 5 holds a candidate for 2-3 days while CC ships ~daily. When that happens the LLM is never called at all —_fetch_changelogreturns"", andanalyzegates the LLM path onif self._router and changelog, so it falls through to a hand-built dict withdetails="Changelog not available". The confident-lookinginformationalverdict in that case is a deterministic fallback, not a judgement — do not read it as "the analyzer looked and found nothing". Two traps in reading that verdict. (a)_fetch_changelogreturns""from five distinct paths — a non-zeroghexit, a timeout, a bareexcept, a non-list payload, and the tag-not-in-newest-5 case. An expiredghauth produces a byte-identicaldetails="Changelog not available", so confirmgh auth statusbefore concluding the tag aged out. (b) There is a SECOND non-judgement path: when the LLM was called and failed, the keyword heuristic also returnsinformationalwith real changelog text. Tell them apart by the" (LLM analysis unavailable)"suffix onsummary— without that suffix and with a non-emptydetails, the verdict is a genuine LLM read. (A whole-(old, new]map-reduce rewrite exists on an unmerged branch — unmerged as of 2026-08-26; grep the file before relying on it. It would still omit the oldest chunks on a very large range, so the GATE does not retire either way.) Triage every hooks / MCP / CLI-flag / subagent / permissions delta. Rule: a changelog claim that "we depend on X" only gates the bump if verified against LIVE usage — the TodoWrite lesson: a removed feature Genesis measured 0 uses of is hygiene, not a blocker.- Take the PRE-align model-alias sample HERE, in step 1. It belongs to the first never skippable step, not to step 2 — step 2 has a legitimate skip condition, and a sample nested under it silently disappears exactly when that skip fires, leaving the step-4 "after" reading with nothing to compare against. It cannot move later either: step 3 replaces the CLI, so this is the last point at which the old binary is still installed. See §Model-alias drift below for the invocation; the post-align half is step 4.
-
Deploy current
mainFIRST —scripts/update.shas a background task, BEFORE aligning the candidate, so the soak runs on current code. Otherwise step 8 lands accumulated Genesis change AND the CC bump together and you cannot attribute a regression to either. Checkable skip condition — three parts, all required:git fetch originfirst (an unfetchedorigin/mainis stale and produces a false "already current"); take the newestupdate_history_recentrow whosestatus == "success"— the tool deliberately returns every attempt includingfailureandrolled_back(update_history.py:98-113), and a failed attempt's later timestamp otherwise reads as evidence of a deployment that never happened; then confirm that row'snew_commitis an ancestor-or-equal of the fetchedorigin/mainhead — mechanically,git merge-base --is-ancestor "$(git rev-parse origin/main)" <new_commit>exits 0. Skip only if all three hold. -
Align the CONTAINER ONLY to the candidate.
source scripts/lib/cc_version.sh # NOTE: this sets CC_VERSION to the repo PIN CC_VERSION=<candidate> # standalone assignment, AFTER the source cc_ensure_local cc_shadow_scan⚠️ Never write
CC_VERSION=<candidate> cc_ensure_localand then a barecc_shadow_scan. An assignment prefix on a function call does not persist past that call, so the scan would run on the OLD pin while the container is on the candidate — and if any copy sits at the old pin it crowns that one canonical and deletes the freshly-installed candidate (cc_version.sh:251). Full rationale: doc §Updating step 3.claude --versionis NOT sufficient here: it spawns a fresh child, which reads the new on-disk binary and truthfully reports the candidate while the session asking the question is still executing the old one. Runscripts/check_cc_running_versions.shinstead — it compares each live process's actual mapped binary against the one on disk. Check the Node floor first —npm view @anthropic-ai/claude-code@<candidate> engines.nodevsnode -v. If it rises above the container's Node, STOP: no container-side Node transition tool exists today (install.sh:473-477hardcodes>= 20and never readsNODE_MAJOR), and a failed align is not a clean no-op —npm install -ghas already replaced the working CC before the verify runs. -
Validate the CANDIDATE against candidate-shaped expectations, not step 9's. During the soak the correct state is container == candidate, host == old pin — step 9 requires BOTH to equal the pin, which cannot hold yet. Run the critical paths, the doc's §Known Issues, and each behavior the impact eval flagged; any Guardian-path check exercises the host's old binary, so candidate-specific Guardian behavior needs a container-side exercise.
- Run
scripts/check_cc_running_versions.shBEFORE validating, not just before the soak. Same trap as step 3 and step 5: validation performed inside a session still mapped to the replaced binary is evidence about the OLD release, and it is the evidence the whole changelog gate feeds into. The check belongs at every point that produces evidence about the candidate — steps 3, 4, 5 and 9 — not only at the soak boundary. - Take the POST-align model-alias sample here and compare it against the pre-align one from
step 2 — nothing else in the system will catch an alias remap. See §Model-alias drift below
for the invocation and for which
modelUsageentry to read (it is not the first one).
- Run
-
Soak 2–3 days under real use — but the clock does not start until every interactive session is actually ON the candidate. A long-running CC process keeps its original binary mapping until it restarts; npm replaces the package underneath it. So relaunch the foreground sessions, then prove it rather than assuming it:
scripts/check_cc_running_versions.sh # exit 0 required before the clock startsRe-run it at soak END too — sessions started mid-soak are fine, but one that predates the align and was never relaunched has been contributing evidence about the OLD release the whole time. Origin (measured on a live install): a soak was declared started and ran its full length with a majority of live CC processes — and most interactive sessions — still executing the replaced predecessor.
cc_shadow_scanwas clean throughout (it scans on-disk copies, not running processes) andclaude --versionreported the candidate the whole time, because it spawns a fresh child. Nothing in the procedure would have caught it.Rollback is one command:
source scripts/lib/cc_version.sh && CC_VERSION=<pin> cc_ensure_local. Do NOT runupdate.shduring the soak — itunsets any inheritedCC_VERSIONand re-aligns the container to the pin, reverting the candidate. Proceed to the public pin only after soak + explicit user sign-off.- Mid-soak drift (CC ships ~daily, so
latestWILL move during the soak): re-target to a newer release mid-cycle ONLY if it fixes something touching our workflow / soak safety / a known issue (e.g. 2.1.245→246 fixed a background-retention sweep that reaped user-created.claude/worktrees/). Otherwise finish the soak on the pinned target and roll the delta into the next cycle — never silently chase-latest. - A re-target RESTARTS the procedure from step 1. New target ⇒ the durable changelog-gate row no longer covers the range, the candidate validation ran against a different binary, and the 2–3 day clock resets. Otherwise you publish a target with hours of real use — defeating the gate exactly for the workflow-affecting releases that justify re-targeting.
- Mid-soak drift (CC ships ~daily, so
-
Bump the pin —
CC_VERSIONinscripts/lib/cc_version.sh; bumpNODE_MAJORin the same file only if the new CC raises itsengines.nodefloor (thecc-node-lockstepCI job,scripts/check_cc_node_lockstep.py, fails the PR otherwise). In the same PR updatedocs/reference/cc-compatibility.md: §Current CC Version, a §Version History row carrying the changelog-gate clause from step 1, and any new caveats. -
PR → CI green (incl.
cc-node-lockstep) → privacy scan → explicit user approval → squash-merge. Thengit pull --rebase origin main. Both gate receipts go in the PR body as trailers — the merge gate blocks a pin-forward PR without them (a pin that moves backward is exempt; rollback is the incident-recovery path):CC-Gate-Changelog: read (2.1.X, 2.1.Y] in full from <source>, <date> CC-Gate-Soak: <candidate> on container <start>..<end>, check_cc_running_versions.sh clean, sign-off recorded -
Host-Deploy Gate — in the SAME session after merge, run
scripts/update.shfrom~/genesisas a background task (deploys exceed the Bash tool timeout): it aligns the container (cc_ensure_local) AND the host VM (guardianupdate-ccop) to the pin, idempotently. Note the nightlygenesis-cc-align.timeris host-only —cc_align_host.shcallscc_align_host_syncand nevercc_ensure_local, so it closes HOST drift between updates and (usefully) will not silently revert a container candidate mid-soak. -
Post-deploy validation (SAME session) — critical paths AND known/tabled issues, not just a smoke. Container + host
claude --version== pin (host via the gatewayversionop / a FRESH gatewayversionop — not~/.genesis/host_gateway_state.json, which is written from the PRE-alignment probe and not refreshed afterupdate-cc, so it reports the OLD version until the nightly timer runs); guardian tick healthy; a CCInvoker / headlessclaude -psmoke on a FRESH process (this foreground session keeps its OLD binary until relaunch); re-check the doc's §Known Issues + any tabled CC bugs against the new version; and verify each behavior the impact eval flagged (e.g. an MCP arg-typing or-presult-shape change) on the live path, not just that the flag still parses. -
Leverage + capture — for each newly-available capability Genesis would want, file the detection→behavior follow-up (below). Store what was learned to memory + this doc + the KB so the next update stays execute-not-rediscover.
Delegating the full changelog read (the GATE — part of step 1)
You may hand the read to a sub-agent — but it must be done with the same context and scrutiny you would apply yourself. A generic "read this changelog and tell me what you think" is NOT the gate: the agent lacks the Genesis impact surfaces, so it returns feature summaries instead of consequences. Brief it with THIS (adapt the range/source):
FIRST confirm
~/tmp/cc_changelog.mdCONTAINS a## <target>heading; if it does not, re-fetch before reading (mkdir -p ~/tmpfirst):curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anthropics/claude-code/main/CHANGELOG.md -o ~/tmp/cc_changelog.md(nothing maintains that file — a stale copy makes this whole review vacuous).Read EVERY release entry in
(<pinned>, <target>]IN FULL. Do NOT summarize generically, and do NOT treat the newest release as already-known — the load-bearing item can sit anywhere, including deep inside the newest release (that is exactly what the last miss looked like). For each release, judge every entry against these Genesis impact surfaces and report only entries with a concrete Genesis consequence, tagged RISK (could break us) / GAIN (fixes something we hit) / LEVERAGE (new capability we'd want):
- Hooks — PreToolUse approval gate,
bash_safety_hook, review-enforcement hooks; exit-code-2 blocking semantics,additionalContext, matcher parsing (Genesis usesmatcheronly — noifconditions); and the hook INPUT PAYLOAD SHAPE — a renamed/removed field silently disables every guard (seetests/test_scripts/test_hook_input_contract.py).- MCP — our servers under
claude -p --mcp-config; arg typing (incl. empty-{}schemas), connect/reconnect, interrupted-call reporting, tool-search/deferred tools.claude -p/ CCInvoker — output/result JSON shape,modelUsage, resume/continue, mid-stream error handling, stdin/stdout.- Flags Genesis actually passes —
-p,--output-format json,--model,--effort,--append-system-prompt,--mcp-config,--strict-mcp-config,--allowedTools,--disallowedTools,--bare,--max-turns,--resume,--dangerously-skip-permissions(full table:docs/reference/cc-compatibility.md§Integration Surface).- Guardian host recovery — the host VM's diagnosis call: a DIFFERENT machine, and the highest-stakes CC call in the system. Actual shape (
src/genesis/guardian/diagnosis.py:546-555):claude -p --model <cfg> --output-format json [--effort <cfg>] --max-turns <cfg> --dangerously-skip-permissions, plus--mcp-config <path> --strict-mcp-configonly whenconfig/no_mcp.jsonexists (otherwise it logs a warning and runs without them). Defaults: modelopus, efforthigh, max-turns 50. So a change to--effortsemantics, or to--mcp-config/--strict-mcp-confighandling, lands squarely on this call.- Subagents / workflows — spawn depth defaults, fork/background defaults,
maxTurnsbehavior, concurrency caps.- Skills / slash commands / plugins — auto-invocation changes, skill discovery + frontmatter, plugin loading (2.1.215 removed CC's proactive
/code-review+/verify, making Genesis's own review-enforcement hooks the primary trigger rather than a backstop).- Permissions / auto mode / Monitor — anything changing what is auto-approved.
- Worktrees — an active install can carry dozens; isolation, retention sweeps,
--worktree.- Cross-session —
SendMessage/ListAgents, sockets in rootless containers.- Security — credential handling, permission-bypass fixes, sandbox/redaction.
- Model / routing — alias→model drift, family step-down, pricing/limits. Include the release number for every finding. Flag anything you are unsure about rather than dropping it.
Coverage receipt (required, not optional). End your report with one line per release in the range, in order —
2.1.NNN: <finding tag(s)>or2.1.NNN: nothing relevant— so every release is explicitly accounted for. Do not pad findings, but do not omit a release from this list either: a missing line reads as "never read", not as "nothing to say". If you run short on turns or budget, STOP and say exactly which releases you did not reach rather than returning a report that looks complete — partial output no longer fails on its own, so an unflagged early stop is invisible to the person reading you.
Then verify before you trust it: independently re-derive the load-bearing findings (the ones that would gate the bump or change our code) from the changelog text and the actual Genesis code — refute-by-default, per the "verify multi-agent output" rule. The delegation saves you reading time, not judgment.
And verify COVERAGE separately from accuracy — they fail differently. Re-deriving the findings
the agent returned can only catch findings that are wrong; it cannot detect releases the agent
never opened. From CC 2.1.246 onward — which the pin now is, though an install may be running
something else, so check what the delegating session is ACTUALLY on rather than assuming the
pin — a subagent that hits maxTurns returns partial output without
failing, so a silent stop two-thirds through the range is indistinguishable from a genuinely short
report. Close that by construction: enumerate every ## release heading in (pinned, target]
yourself (grep -n '^## ' ~/tmp/cc_changelog.md), and require the agent to acknowledge each release
explicitly — including the ones it judged irrelevant. Reconcile the two lists before marking the
gate done. Any release without an acknowledgement means the gate is not done, no matter how
good the returned findings look. Ask for the per-release acknowledgement in the brief, not
afterwards — a re-ask cannot recover context the agent already dropped.
Model-alias drift — CHECK IT BY HAND, nothing watches it
--model opus (and every alias) silently re-points to a new full model id when Anthropic bumps the
family — measured live: opus resolved claude-opus-4-8 → claude-opus-5 across a CC bump,
with no warning anywhere. This is NOT a downgrade, so the tier-based downgrade detector is blind to
it, and no drift detector exists on main today — there is nothing to alert you.
So take two samples, and mind where each one goes: the PRE-align sample is a step 1 item (step 3 replaces the CLI, so step 4 is too late for a "before" reading), and the POST-align sample is a step-4 item. It belongs in step 1 specifically, not step 2 — step 2 carries an explicit skip condition, and a reader who skips it would keep only the post-align value, leaving alias remapping undetectable because there is nothing to compare against.
claude -p --model <alias> --output-format json 'ok' # <alias> = opus | sonnet | haiku
Pass --model <alias> explicitly. Production supplies it — CCInvoker._build_args appends
["--model", str(inv.model)] — so omitting it samples whatever default the environment resolves,
which is not the mapping under test. (Cite symbols, not line numbers: this file's line numbers
differ between refs, and a stale number sends the reader to unrelated code.)
modelUsage can list MORE THAN ONE model, and dict order is not tier order. CC's auxiliary
haiku calls (titles/topics) appear alongside the main model; taking the first key false-positived
downgrade detection on a sonnet session that listed {haiku, sonnet-5} (2026-07-09), which is why
CCInvoker._parse_result_dict selects the max by _TIER_RANK rather than the first key
(tests/test_cc/test_invoker.py::test_parse_result_dict_ignores_auxiliary_model_for_downgrade).
For drift the failure direction is a miss, not a false alarm: compare the auxiliary entry on
both sides and it looks stable while the main model has been remapped.
⚠️ Do not simply copy "take the highest tier" — that ranking BREAKS on the exact case you are
looking for. CCModel.from_full_name returns None for any id containing no known tier keyword,
and _TIER_RANK.get(None, -1) ranks it below haiku. So if the alias remaps to a model family
Genesis does not yet recognise — precisely alias drift — the max-by-tier pick silently returns the
auxiliary haiku, and the very code cited above reports the wrong model. You cannot rank an id you
have never seen, and neither can it.
So read it this way instead: compare the SETS. List every key of modelUsage before and after.
If a key present after is absent before, that is your answer regardless of tier — investigate it,
and if its family is unrecognised, that is itself a finding (Genesis's downgrade detection is blind
to that id until CCModel learns it). Only fall back to the tier ranking when both sides contain
exactly the same recognised families.
(Note model_used is a Genesis-side CCOutput attribute, NOT a field of the raw claude -p JSON.)
The posture is deliberate float (accept the newer model), but floating without checking means the model behind every CCInvoker and experiment call can change unnoticed.
Durable facts (don't re-derive; verify against the doc if a memory contradicts this)
- Both container and host install CC via npm-global — there is NO native-installer path
(
/usr/bin/claude→/usr/lib/node_modules/@anthropic-ai/claude-code; container under its own npm prefix). One canonical copy per machine, enforced bycc_shadow_scan. (If a stored memory claims the host uses the native installer, it is stale — the doc is authoritative.) origin=GENesis-AGI= the public repo — merging the pin publishes it; installs pull it viaupdate.sh. There is no separate private→public step.- Auto-updater is disabled (
DISABLE_AUTOUPDATER/DISABLE_UPDATESin user-level~/.claude/settings.json), so the pin is the only mover; an ad-hocnpm i -ggets healed back to the pin on the next align run. - Downgrade is supported and deliberate — the pin can go DOWN and
update-cc <older>rolls the host back; there is NOrequiredMinimumVersionfloor (it would remove the incident-recovery path and can brick CC).
Watch-items a CC bump can change under Genesis
Genesis leans on CC internals; a release can shift them silently. When evaluating, check whether the delta touches:
- Hooks — exit-code-2 blocking semantics,
additionalContext, matcher parsing (our approval gate +bash_safety_hook+ review-enforcement hooks depend on these). - Subagents — nesting default +
CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_SUBAGENT_SPAWN_DEPTH/CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_CONCURRENT_SUBAGENTS(2.1.217 made nesting opt-in); and whether workflow/subagent file-writes still hit our PreToolUse approval gate underclaude -p. - Skills/commands — e.g. 2.1.215 removed CC's proactive
/code-review+/verifyauto-invocation (Genesis's own review-enforcement layer is now the primary trigger, not a backstop). --flagsGenesis passes (--model,--mcp-config,--bare,-p,--append-system-prompt).
Capture any such change as a follow-up + a doc entry — that is how the next update stays execute-not-rediscover.
Detection → behavior (new-capability adoption path)
The impact eval treats a new feature as informational by design ("available" is not "required") — correct for alerting, but it left no path from "detected" to "Genesis actually starts using it". So, when the changelog review flags a NEW skill/command/flag that Genesis would plausibly WANT (it overlaps an existing Genesis workflow, replaces a hand-rolled mechanism, or covers a known gap), do BOTH:
- File the informational KB entry as usual (no alert — calibration unchanged).
- Create a
follow_up_createrow (work_state="ready", low priority) naming the SPECIFIC instruction change, e.g. "once CC >= vX.Y.Z is pinned: prefer native/designover the gstackdesign-*skills for UI drafting; decide precedence and update the relevant skill/CLAUDE.md instruction". A capability nobody wires into an instruction is a capability Genesis never reaches for.
Origin (2026-08-18): the /design research-preview announcement had no route
from detection to adoption; the user asked "how do we make sure you
automatically leverage this when you should?" — this step is the answer.
Version History
-
6f3310e
Current 2026-09-03 01:52
将更新流程从基于 MCP 的自动化分析改为强制手动阅读完整 Changelog 并验证 GitHub Release。
- 3ca56ae 2026-08-27 14:04
- 5d12d48 2026-07-31 11:21


