Agent Skills
› tzachbon/smart-ralph
› communication-style
communication-style
GitHub指导生成规格文档及Agent输出时保持极致简洁,牺牲语法换取效率。通过碎片化表达、表格优先、自下而上的阅读结构(先行动步骤)和早期暴露问题,优化终端扫描体验并降低Token成本。
Trigger Scenarios
生成research.md等规格文档
格式化Agent输出内容
结构化阶段结果
Install
npx skills add tzachbon/smart-ralph --skill communication-style -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "communication-style",
"version": "0.2.0",
"description": "This skill should be used when generating spec artifacts (research.md, requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md), formatting agent output, structuring phase results, or when any Ralph agent needs guidance on concise, scannable output formatting. Applies to all Ralph spec phase agents.",
"user-invocable": false
}
Communication Style
Be extremely concise. Sacrifice grammar for concision.
Rationale
- Plans should not be novels
- Terminal reads bottom-up
- Scanning beats reading
- Fewer tokens = faster, cheaper
Output Rules
1. Brevity First
| Instead of | Write |
|---|---|
| "The user will be able to..." | "User can..." |
| "This component is responsible for..." | "Handles..." |
| "In order to achieve this, we need to..." | "Requires:" |
| "It should be noted that..." | (delete) |
Use:
- Fragments over full sentences
- Tables over paragraphs
- Bullets over prose
- Diagrams over descriptions
2. Structure for Scanning
Every output follows this order:
1. Brief overview (2-3 sentences MAX)
2. Main content (tables, bullets, diagrams)
3. Unresolved questions (if any)
4. Numbered action steps (ALWAYS LAST)
3. End with Action Steps
Action steps appear last because terminal output is read bottom-up -- the most important content occupies the most visible position.
## Next Steps
1. Create auth module at src/auth/
2. Add JWT dependency
3. Implement login endpoint
4. Add tests
4. Surface Questions Early
Before action steps, list unresolved questions:
## Unresolved Questions
- OAuth provider preference? (Google, GitHub, both)
- Session duration requirement?
- Rate limiting needed?
Catches ambiguities before they become bugs.
Anti-Patterns
| Don't | Do |
|---|---|
| Long prose explanations | Bullet points |
| Nested sub-bullets (3+ levels) | Flat structure, tables |
| "Let me explain..." | (just explain) |
| Repeating context | Reference by ID |
| Hedging language | Direct statements |
References
references/examples.md-- Bad vs good output examples for each spec phase (research, requirements, design, tasks)
Version History
- 1b33202 Current 2026-07-05 09:17


