idea-genie
GitHub用于生成基于证据的机会组合或挑战关键想法,支持elicitation和duel两种模式,输出结构化建议供决策参考。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add boshu2/agentops --skill idea-genie -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "idea-genie",
"consumes": [
"repo-context",
"task-question",
"idea-portfolio.v1"
],
"metadata": {
"tier": "execution",
"effects": [
"write_idea_portfolio"
],
"disposition": "keep_strategy",
"capabilities": [
"generate_evidenced_options",
"dueling_idea_genies"
],
"dependencies": [],
"canonical_status": "canonical"
},
"produces": [
"idea-portfolio.v1",
"idea-challenge.v1"
],
"practices": [
"lean-startup",
"bdd-gherkin",
"design-by-contract",
"llm-eval-harness",
"adr"
],
"context_rel": [
{
"kind": "customer-of",
"with": "research"
},
{
"kind": "supplier-to",
"with": "plan"
}
],
"description": "Generate evidenced opportunities or challenge an idea with sealed perspectives. Triggers: \"idea genie\", \"what should we build\", \"challenge this idea\", \"compare proposals\".",
"hexagonal_role": "domain",
"user-invocable": true,
"output_contract": "idea-portfolio.v1 JSON validated by skills\/idea-genie\/scripts\/validate-output.sh (elicit mode), or idea-challenge.v1 JSON validated by skills\/idea-genie\/scripts\/validate-challenge.sh (duel mode)",
"skill_api_version": 1
}
Idea Genie
One canonical root for idea work: elicit an evidence-grounded opportunity portfolio, or challenge a consequential idea with sealed independent perspectives. Both modes explore and advise; neither selects, schedules, tracks, implements, or validates work.
Modes
| Trigger phrases | Mode | Output contract |
|---|---|---|
| "idea genie", "what should we build", "supported opportunities" | elicit (single genie) | idea-portfolio.v1 via scripts/validate-output.sh |
| "challenge this idea", "compare independent proposals", "stress-test a one-way door" | duel (adversarial challenge) | idea-challenge.v1 via scripts/validate-challenge.sh |
Elicitation is the entry mode. Dueling is an optional escalation for a
consequential choice, typically consuming an idea-portfolio.v1 or a framed
question.
Elicit mode
Generate a small portfolio of evidenced options.
- State the question, constraints, non-goals, and sources. Hydrate only the sources this question needs and cite them; no merged context store.
- Separate cited observations from assumptions.
- Give each candidate its supporting evidence, overlap with existing capabilities, and one normal or edge scenario.
- Run a novelty pass, merge equivalents, and discard unsupported ideas.
- Stop when no materially new evidenced candidate appears.
- Write and validate
idea-portfolio.v1, then return it to the caller or Plan.
An empty no-new-work portfolio is valid. Plan alone may incorporate a selected
option into the existing bead or caller intent.
Duel mode
Produce independent challenges for a consequential choice. The result is advisory evidence for Plan. It never decides whether a plan is ready and never turns a later optional Premortem challenge into an approval gate.
Constraints
- Keep generation sealed until every perspective is complete to prevent later proposals from anchoring on earlier ones.
- Preserve dissent and concrete refutation attempts because Plan must see alternatives that synthesis might otherwise erase.
- Keep reversible choices lightweight because they do not warrant a pane manager, messaging service, council, or model-family rule.
- Emit no readiness, approval, quorum, retry, budget, helper, delivery, or tracker state because this strategy supplies evidence rather than lifecycle authority.
Workflow
- Freeze the question, constraints, evidence paths, and comparison rubric.
- For a one-way door, create at least two fresh contexts with distinct context
identifiers. Each produces its perspective before any is revealed. When the
caller pins perspectives to model profiles, record each perspective's
model_identity(see theagent-nativemodel-dispatch recipe); a duel may use two distinct models on request. Sealed generation is unchanged: no perspective may see another before reveal. Unavailable profiles → disclose and continue single-model. - Reveal the sealed perspectives and cross-review by evidence, reversibility, system fit, failure modes, and cost.
- Attempt concrete refutations. Preserve disagreements, failed refutations, and minority reasoning.
- Write
idea-challenge.v1, validate it, and pass the artifact to Plan as one optional input alongside research and operator intent.
For a cheap two-way door, emit the lightweight packet directly after one fresh challenge. Do not manufacture panel ceremony.
Output Specification
- Artifact directory:
.agents/scratch/ideas/<run-id>/ - Filename:
idea-challenge.json - Format:
idea-challenge.v1JSON with route-specific fields enforced by the validator - Validation command:
skills/idea-genie/scripts/validate-challenge.sh <idea-challenge.json> - Downstream handoff:
handoff.owneris exactlyplan; Plan may accept, reject, or combine the advisory evidence
Quality
- One-way packets prove distinct context IDs and cross-review another perspective by named dimensions.
- Dissent and refutation attempts remain explicit.
- The packet contains no semantic readiness field or decision.
- The validator passes before handoff to Plan.
Do not
- Let perspectives see one another before sealed generation completes.
- Convert consensus, transport availability, or a self-score into readiness.
- Require orchestration infrastructure for a reversible choice.
References
Version History
-
7b07a7d
Current 2026-08-19 21:59
增强Duel模式的密封生成约束,明确模型身份记录与独立视角交叉审查流程,细化不可用配置的回退策略。
- 3f402e5 2026-07-24 22:07


