Agent Skills
› lightdash/lightdash
› creating-pull-requests
creating-pull-requests
GitHub定义创建 Pull Request 的规范,包括标题格式、隐私脱敏、禁止引用内部沟通内容以及必须关联工单等规则,确保 PR 符合仓库标准。
Trigger Scenarios
用户请求创建或打开 Pull Request
用户需要撰写 PR 标题或描述
用户询问 PR 提交规范
Install
npx skills add lightdash/lightdash --skill creating-pull-requests -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "creating-pull-requests",
"metadata": {
"internal": true
},
"invocation": "user",
"description": "Use when creating, opening, or writing the title\/description of a pull request, or writing PR bodies via `gh pr create` or `gt submit`. Covers what must go in the PR description (a ticket — GitHub issue or Linear) and what must never appear (client\/customer names or their data)."
}
Creating Pull Requests
Conventions for every PR body in this repo. Applies regardless of whether the PR is opened via gh pr create or gt submit.
Rules
- PR titles must be conventional commits —
<type>[optional scope]: <description>, with a type from build, chore, ci, docs, feat, fix, perf, refactor, revert, style, test (e.g.fix(dashboards): remove infinite loop during login). TheValidate PR Titlecheck blocks merging otherwise, and the title becomes the squash-merge commit that drives semantic-release — usefeat/fixonly for user-facing value. - Never mention client/customer names or their data examples anywhere in the PR title, description, or commit messages. Redact to generic terms ("a customer", "an org", "example values") even when a Linear ticket or issue references the customer by name.
- Never quote, summarize, or attribute Slack messages or other internal-communication content anywhere in the PR title, description, or commit messages — even when Slack/internal chatter was used as an investigation or evidence source. Cite only that the signal was checked and what it showed, in generic terms (no channel names, no quoted text, no who-said-what).
- Always close or reference a ticket — GitHub issue or Linear ticket, either one is enough. Use
Closes: #XXXXX/Closes: PROD-XXXXto close it, orRelates:if it shouldn't auto-close. A GitHub issue automatically creates a Linear counterpart (the reverse is not true), so a GitHub issue alone fully satisfies this rule — do not ask for a Linear ticket when a GitHub issue is already referenced. If neither exists, do not fabricate one and do not silently omit it — flag it to the developer and ask. Only open the PR without a ticket once they explicitly confirm there isn't one. - Subticket → parent's GitHub issue is
Relates, notCloses. A subticket's PR should not close the parent's tracking issue; add it as related.
Footer Format
PR closing a GitHub issue (its Linear counterpart is created and closed automatically):
Closes: #22801
PR closing a Linear ticket only (no GitHub issue exists):
Closes: PROD-7478
Subticket (closes the Linear subticket; the GitHub issue belongs to the parent, so relate it):
Closes: PROD-7478
Relates: #22801
Checklist Before Opening
- The PR title is a valid conventional commit (
type(scope): description) - No client/customer name or their data anywhere in the title, body, or commits
- No quoted/summarized Slack or internal-communication content anywhere in the title, body, or commits
- A
Closes:/Relates:line for a ticket (GitHub issue or Linear) is present, OR the developer explicitly confirmed there's no ticket - Subtickets relate (not close) the parent's GitHub issue
Version History
-
d60d235
Current 2026-08-29 03:44
新增接受 GitHub Issue 作为工单引用;本地执行约定式提交检查以匹配 CI 规则。
- 71d06ec 2026-08-20 16:07


