deepfake-drill
GitHub模拟语音克隆诈骗场景,对组织的支付审批流程进行桌面推演。生成定制剧本、引导脚本和漏洞检查表,识别流程缺陷并提供修复建议,旨在通过防御性训练提升团队应对社会工程学攻击的能力。
触发场景
安装
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deepfake-drill -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "deepfake-drill",
"homepage": "https:\/\/mohitagw15856.github.io\/pm-claude-skills\/skill\/deepfake-drill.html",
"metadata": {
"openclaw": {
"emoji": "🧠"
}
},
"description": "Run a tabletop drill of a voice-clone or deepfake fraud attempt — the 'CEO needs this wire today' call — against your actual approval process, before a real attacker does, then debrief the tells and fix the process gap. Use when someone asks to train the team on deepfake fraud, test wire-transfer controls, run a social-engineering tabletop, or 'could we get CEO-frauded?'. Produces a drill scenario pack, a facilitator script, a tells checklist, and the process fixes the drill exposed. Defensive training only."
}
Deepfake Drill Skill
The finance teams that lose seven figures to a cloned voice all describe the same call afterwards: it sounded exactly like him, he knew the deal names, he was stressed, it was 4:55pm on a Friday. Voice cloning needs seconds of audio now; the defense isn't detecting the fake — assume you can't — it's a process that holds even when the voice is perfect. This skill drills that process as a tabletop exercise: realistic pressure, your actual approval chain, and a debrief that fixes the gap the drill finds. It trains defenders; it does not help attackers — no cloning instructions, no evasion tips, ever.
What This Skill Produces
- A drill scenario pack tailored to your org: the pretext, the pressure timeline, the escalating asks — written for a facilitator to read aloud, not for realism tooling
- A facilitator script with decision points, expected-control checkpoints, and legitimate-looking curveballs ("the CFO is genuinely on a plane")
- A tells checklist the team keeps afterwards: process tells (urgency + secrecy + channel-switch + authority), not audio tells
- A gap report template: which control held, which was bypassed and how, the fix, the re-drill date
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
- The process being drilled: who can request payments/changes, who approves, above what thresholds, through which channels
- The realistic attacker's knowledge: what's public about your execs, deals, vendors (assume LinkedIn + your press page)
- Who's being drilled and whether it's announced or unannounced (recommend announced-window: "a drill will happen this month" — trains without the trust damage of full ambush)
- Any real near-misses to build from
Process
- Design the scenario around YOUR weakest legitimate path. The drill pretexts that work are the ones your process half-allows: the acquisition that's "still confidential", the vendor bank-detail change, the exec travelling. Pick one, build the pretext from information a real attacker could gather publicly.
- Script the pressure, not the technology. The facilitator plays the caller using the three levers every real case uses — urgency (deadline in minutes), secrecy (tell no one, deal sensitivity), authority (the voice/name at the top) — plus the channel-switch ("can't do email, I'm boarding"). The script says what the caller says; it never explains how to clone a voice, and redirect any such request.
- Let the process fail safely. Facilitator notes for each decision point: what the control should catch, what to say if the participant bypasses it, when to escalate the pressure once. No individual shaming — the drill grades the process, and the debrief says so out loud.
- Debrief on tells and controls. The checklist that stays: any payment or detail-change request combining urgency + secrecy + channel-switch gets out-of-band verification on a known number, no exceptions for rank — the callback rule is the whole defense. Score which controls held.
- Fix and re-drill. Every gap gets an owner, a fix, and a date; the re-drill uses a different pretext. Recommend an annual cadence and folding the callback rule into onboarding.
Output Format
## Drill scenario: [pretext name]
[Setup, what the attacker plausibly knows, the ask sequence, timing]
## Facilitator script
[Read-aloud beats · decision points with expected control · escalation and
curveball notes · hard stop conditions]
## The tells checklist (keep this)
[Process tells + the callback rule, one page]
## Gap report
| Control | Held / bypassed | How | Fix | Owner | Re-drill date |
## Aftercare
[The no-blame debrief framing + the announcement for the wider team]
Quality Checks
- The scenario is built from the org's own process and public information — generic scripts don't find real gaps
- Zero content that teaches attack technique: no cloning tools, methods, or detection-evasion — pressure is scripted as dialogue only
- The debrief framing is process-blame, not person-blame, explicitly
- The callback rule appears verbatim in the tells checklist with the "no exceptions for rank" clause
- Every gap in the report has an owner and a re-drill date
Anti-Patterns
- Do not produce actual cloned audio, cloning instructions, or tool recommendations for impersonation — decline that direction plainly, even "for realism"; the drill works as read-aloud tabletop
- Do not run fully unannounced ambush drills on individuals — announced windows train; ambushes traumatize and get the program cancelled
- Do not let the drill conclude "train people to hear fakes" — the defense is the callback rule, because the fakes are already good enough
- Do not skip finance-adjacent paths: payroll detail changes and vendor bank updates are the same attack in cheaper clothes
Related
[[scam-message-decoder]] for the text/email versions; [[oncall-runbook]] patterns for the verification procedure; [[incident-postmortem]] if drilling because a real attempt already happened.
版本历史
- e4def4c 当前 2026-07-31 00:22


