Agent SkillsMageByte-Zero/spec-superflow › release-archivist

release-archivist

GitHub

用于在变更执行阶段完成最终验证、审计与归档。通过状态守卫确保流程安全,支持快速路径或完整清单验证,检查测试、代码完整性及一致性,生成报告并决定发布结果。

skills/release-archivist/SKILL.md MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow

触发场景

实现已完成且准备进行最终验收 正在进行验证工作 用户请求最终收尾

安装

npx skills add MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow --skill release-archivist -g -y
更多选项

不安装直接使用

npx skills use MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow@release-archivist

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow --skill release-archivist -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "release-archivist",
    "description": "Close out a spec-superflow change with verification, summary, and archive readiness. Invoke when implementation is complete, verification is underway, or the user asks for a final wrap-up."
}

Release Archivist

Finish a spec-superflow change cleanly with verification evidence. This skill operates while the change state is executing; it is not an active skill after the final transition to closing.

Execution-State Guard

Before verification, ssf audit, any DP state write, or delta-spec merge, run ssf state get <change-dir> state. Continue only when the persisted state is exactly executing. If it is closing → STOP: "Closing is terminal; release, audit, and archival work were completed before this transition." For any other state, or if the state cannot be read → STOP and route through workflow-start; do not perform side effects.

Direct Short-Path Closure (run before the Full checklist)

For Quick, Tweak, or a valid direct incident Hotfix receipt, skip the Full verification, audit, delta merge, DP-6, and DP-7 sections below. Record changed files, the focused verification command and result, then persist test_result: pass and transition to closing. Quick requires a targeted test or syntax/static check; direct Hotfix requires an original-symptom regression. A legacy Hotfix stays on the Full checklist.

Full/Legacy Verification Before Completion

The Full checklist below applies only to Full and legacy Hotfix. Direct Short-Path Closure above takes precedence for Quick, Tweak, and valid direct Hotfix.

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency. Before claiming any status:

  1. IDENTIFY the command that proves the claim
  2. RUN the full command fresh
  3. READ output, check exit code
  4. VERIFY output confirms the claim
  5. Only THEN make the claim

Forbidden before evidence: "should", "probably", "seems to", expressions of satisfaction without output.

Claim Requires Not Sufficient
Tests pass Test output: 0 failures Previous run, "should pass"
Linter clean Linter output: 0 errors Partial check
Build succeeds Build exit 0 Linter passing
Bug fixed Original symptom passes Code changed
Requirements met Line-by-line checklist Tests passing

Full/Legacy Verification Steps

Step 1: Test Suite

Run full test suite. Record total/passed/failed/skipped. Zero failures = PASS.

Step 2: Completeness

Compare contract batches against actual diff. Every SHALL/MUST must have implementation evidence. Missing = Critical severity.

Step 3: Coherence

Compare design decisions against code. Check naming consistency. Inconsistencies = IMPORTANT.

Step 4: Unintended Scope

Check for files modified outside scope fence, new dependencies not in design. Unplanned = WARN.

Step 5: Report

Dimension Status Findings
Completeness PASS/FAIL/WARN [list]
Correctness PASS/FAIL/WARN [list]
Coherence PASS/FAIL/WARN [list]

Verdict: PASS (all PASS) / CONDITIONAL (WARN only) / FAIL (any FAIL).

  • FAIL → fix issues or route back to build-executor
  • CONDITIONAL → present WARNs, proceed only with user acceptance
  • PASS → proceed to final checks

Full/Legacy Final Checks

  • Tests passing? (cite command and output)
  • All batches complete? (cite batch status)
  • Scope added without artifact updates?
  • Unresolved blockers or known risks?
  • Delta specs exist that need merging?
  • Run ssf audit <change-dir> — include decision-point-audit.md in archive

DP-6 (Verification Outcome, Full/legacy Hotfix)

ssf state set <change-dir> dp_6_result "<pass|conditional|fail>: <summary>"
ssf state set <change-dir> dp_6_timestamp $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)

If FAIL, do NOT proceed to DP-7. Route back or ask about abandonment.

After recording a PASS outcome, also record it as the verification gate so the executing → closing transition is allowed (the guard accepts either test_result: pass or a dp_6_result starting with pass):

ssf state set <change-dir> test_result pass

DP-7 (Archive Confirmation, Full/legacy Hotfix)

ssf state set <change-dir> dp_7_result "confirmed: <archive summary>"
ssf state set <change-dir> dp_7_timestamp $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)

Verify DP-0 through DP-6 are recorded before DP-7.

Archive Rule (Full/legacy Hotfix)

If implementation diverged from the contract, return to bridging before closure.

Finalize While Executing (Full/legacy Hotfix)

Complete every release, delta-spec synchronization, and audit action while the state remains executing. If delta specs exist, invoke spec-merger and resolve its outcome before the final executing → closing transition. Then run ssf state transition <change-dir> closing. executing → closing is the final action: once it succeeds, select no next skill and run no recovery scans.

Lightweight Closure (Quick/direct Hotfix/tweak)

Quick and direct Hotfix use a concise verification summary: changed files, focused command, result, and persisted test_result: pass. Quick runs targeted tests or syntax/static checks; direct Hotfix proves the original symptom regression. Do not require a contract, execution plan, review receipt, DP-6, or DP-7. A legacy Hotfix remains on the full contract/DP/review closure path. Tweak verifies file integrity and also persists test_result: pass.

Exception Handling

  • Parse failures: Report exact file and section
  • Missing files: If audit can't generate, run ssf audit manually
  • User interruption: Re-run verification from the beginning on resume
  • DP gaps: Flag missing DPs during DP-6; ask user whether to proceed or return

版本历史

  • 9105098 当前 2026-08-02 21:57

    简化了状态检查命令,移除了具体的包版本依赖(npx --yes --package spec-superflow@0.12.1),改为通用调用方式。

  • 1970fe7 2026-07-30 20:20

同 Skill 集合

skills/bug-investigator/SKILL.md
skills/build-executor/SKILL.md
skills/code-reviewer/SKILL.md
skills/contract-builder/SKILL.md
skills/need-explorer/SKILL.md
skills/spec-merger/SKILL.md
skills/spec-writer/SKILL.md
skills/workflow-start/SKILL.md

元信息

文件数
0
版本
9105098
Hash
f293388d
收录时间
2026-07-30 20:20

首页 - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-08-03 23:19
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $访客地图$