student-feedback
GitHub该技能用于为学生作业提供具体、可操作的反馈。它强调指出具体优点和少数关键改进点，并提供明确的下一步行动建议。语气温暖且以成长为导向，旨在激励学生而非仅给出分数，适用于写作批改、评分评论及学习辅导场景。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill student-feedback -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "student-feedback",
"description": "Write constructive, specific feedback on student work that motivates and tells the student exactly how to improve. Use when asked to give feedback on a student's work, write grading comments, respond to an essay or assignment, or coach a learner. Produces feedback that names concrete strengths, prioritises the few changes that matter most, and gives an actionable next step — warm in tone, growth-oriented, never just a grade."
}
Student Feedback Skill
Feedback changes learning only when it's specific, prioritised, and actionable. This skill writes comments that tell a student what worked, the one or two things to fix next, and exactly how — in a tone that keeps them motivated.
Working from a brief
Given the work (or a description of it) and the level, write the full feedback anyway. If the actual work isn't pasted, give a strong model of well-structured feedback and note it should be grounded in the specific submission. No empty "[comment]" placeholders.
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
- The student work (or a description) and the assignment / objective it's graded against
- Grade or level and tone (encouraging for a struggling student; more rigorous for advanced)
- Rubric or criteria if one exists
- Purpose (a grade with comments, a draft for revision, formative coaching)
Output Format
Glow — what's working (be specific)
2–3 concrete strengths tied to the work ("your thesis in paragraph 1 is arguable and clear"), not "good job."
Grow — the priority fixes
The 1–3 highest-leverage changes, in order. For each: what to change, why it matters, and a concrete example or model of the better version. Don't list every error — prioritise.
Your next step
One specific, doable action for the next draft or assignment ("in your next essay, start each paragraph with a claim, then evidence").
Optional: a sentence of encouragement
Genuine, growth-oriented ("you're close — tightening your evidence will lift this a whole level"), not empty praise.
If a rubric was given, map the feedback to its criteria.
Quality Checks
- Strengths and fixes are specific to the actual work, not generic
- Prioritises the few changes that matter — doesn't drown the student in every error
- Each "grow" point says why and shows how
- Ends with one clear, actionable next step
- Tone is honest and motivating, matched to the student
Anti-Patterns
- "Good job!" / "Needs work" with nothing concrete
- Marking every single error so the student can't see what matters
- Criticism with no model of the better version
- A tone that discourages instead of pointing forward
Version History
- a38bc30 Current 2026-07-05 11:45
