Backend Development

Reference for backend conventions. There is no custom backend server all server-side logic uses Supabase: PostgreSQL (tables, views, triggers, RLS), Auth API, Storage, and Edge Functions. Read the relevant section before writing backend code, then check the Red Flags and Verification list.

When to Use

• Deciding whether a change needs backend logic at all (default: prefer the frontend).
• Creating or modifying database views, triggers, or RLS policies.
• Writing or changing a Supabase edge function, or a custom dataProvider method that calls Supabase.

For the SQL migration mechanics themselves, see Skill({skill: "writing-migrations"}). For the frontend side of a dataProvider method, see Skill({skill: "frontend-dev"}).

Deciding where logic belongs

Prefer frontend-only solutions via custom dataProvider methods calling the PostgREST API.

When backend logic is needed:

• Aggregation/read optimization: Create a database view (CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW in a new migration). PostgREST exposes views like tables. When underlying table columns change, update the contacts_summary and companies_summary views too.
• Complex mutations (multi-table writes): Create a Supabase edge function in Deno. Stored procedures via RPC are less preferred (code lives in migrations, harder to maintain). On the frontend, expose the edge function as a custom dataProvider method (using httpClient(${supabaseUrl}/functions/v1/)) and call it via react-query. (e.g. salesCreate() → /functions/v1/users, mergeContacts() → /functions/v1/merge_contacts)

Edge function conventions

• Shared utils in supabase/functions/_shared/ — reuse authentication.ts, supabaseAdmin.ts, cors.ts, utils.ts
• Follow the middleware chain pattern: CORS preflight → authenticate() → handler
• verify_jwt = false in config.toml, so JWT validation is manual via authenticate()

Other conventions

• New tables need RLS policies and the auto-set sales_id trigger (see migration 20260108160722)

RLS enforcement pitfalls (security-critical)

• A trigger/function that counts rows to enforce a limit (capacity, quota, balance, subscription depletion) must be SECURITY DEFINER with a fixed search_path, or delegate to one. A SECURITY INVOKER count runs under the caller's RLS, sees only the rows that caller may read, under-counts, and the limit silently never fires (e.g. session_booked_count is DEFINER for exactly this reason).
• A WITH CHECK clause must constrain every column a non-admin may set, not just ownership. with check (contact_id = current_user_contact()) alone lets the caller forge any other column (status, type, amounts, flags) via PostgREST — privilege escalation / payment bypass. Whitelist allowed values in the policy, a trigger, or a CHECK constraint; never trust a client-chosen status/type.

Red Flags

• Reaching for an edge function or RPC where a custom dataProvider method against PostgREST would do.
• Adding a column to a table that feeds contacts_summary/companies_summary without updating the view.
• A new table without RLS policies or the sales_id trigger.
• A row-counting limit enforced by a SECURITY INVOKER function it under-counts and never fires.
• A WITH CHECK that constrains only ownership while leaving status/type/amounts client-settable.
• An edge function handler that runs before authenticate() in the middleware chain.

Verification

• The logic genuinely needs the backend no frontend-only path was available.
• New/changed views keep contacts_summary and companies_summary in sync.
• New tables have RLS policies and the sales_id trigger.
• Any limit-enforcing count runs SECURITY DEFINER with a fixed search_path.
• Every column a non-admin can set is constrained by policy, trigger, or CHECK.
• Edge functions follow CORS → authenticate() → handler.