Agent Skillsmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills › sop-meeting-prep

sop-meeting-prep

GitHub

用于准备S&OP会议演示文稿,聚焦供需缺口与关键决策。生成缺口表、情景杠杆成本分析、库存预测及必须做出的三项决策清单,并附带预读材料包,确保会议高效决策。

exports/openclaw/sop-meeting-prep/SKILL.md mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

Trigger Scenarios

准备S&OP会议 构建高管S&OP演示文稿 总结月度供需情况 准备供应审查报告

Install

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill sop-meeting-prep -g -y
More Options

Non-standard path

npx skills add https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/exports/openclaw/sop-meeting-prep -g -y

Use without installing

npx skills use mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills@sop-meeting-prep

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill sop-meeting-prep -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "sop-meeting-prep",
    "homepage": "https:\/\/mohitagw15856.github.io\/pm-claude-skills\/skill\/sop-meeting-prep.html",
    "metadata": {
        "openclaw": {
            "emoji": "📦"
        }
    },
    "description": "Prepare an S&OP cycle readout that surfaces the demand-supply gaps and forces the three decisions the meeting must make. Use when asked to prep an S&OP meeting, build the executive S&OP deck, summarize demand vs supply for the monthly cycle, or prepare a supply review readout. Produces a gap table, scenario levers with costs, an inventory projection, a decisions-required list, and a pre-read package."
}

S&OP Meeting Prep Skill

An S&OP meeting that reviews numbers but decides nothing just delayed the miss by a month. This skill prepares the readout so the meeting spends its time on the three decisions only that room can make — not on re-litigating the forecast. Everything else goes in the pre-read, gaps are quantified in units and money, and every open gap arrives with priced scenario levers.

What This Skill Produces

  • A demand vs. supply gap table by product family and month
  • Scenario levers for each material gap (expedite / build-ahead / allocate / demand-shape) with cost and consequence
  • A projected inventory position (units, value, days/weeks of supply) under the recommended plan
  • The three decisions the meeting must make, each framed with options and a recommendation
  • A pre-read package with what to absorb before the meeting vs. what will be decided in it

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • Planning horizon & buckets — typically months 1–18, decisions concentrated in months 1–3
  • Demand plan — consensus forecast by family, plus notable changes since last cycle
  • Supply plan — capacity, committed material, known constraints (lines, labor, supplier allocations)
  • Inventory position — current on-hand, in-transit, and targets by family
  • Carry-overs — decisions or actions from last cycle and their status
  • Financial context — revenue plan the volumes must support; standard margins if trade-off math is needed

From a thin brief, build the structure with the numbers marked [to confirm] — a skeleton the planner fills beats a refusal.

Gap & Decision Framework

Gap table discipline — for each family × month: demand, supply, gap (units and %), and gap valued at revenue at risk. Classify each gap:

Gap size Class Treatment
Within ±5% Noise Note it; no meeting time
5–15% Manageable Lever proposed in pre-read; meeting ratifies
>15% or any strategic account short Escalation A named decision on the agenda

Scenario levers — price every option, never present a bare gap:

  • Expedite — premium freight / overtime: cost per unit recovered, margin erosion
  • Build-ahead — pull production into soft months: inventory carrying cost, obsolescence exposure if demand slips
  • Allocate — who gets shorted, by name: revenue and relationship consequence per customer tier
  • Demand-shape — delay a promotion/launch: revenue timing shift, commercial owner's agreement required

The three-decisions rule — the agenda names at most three decisions, each stated as a question with options A/B, the cost of each, and a recommendation. If there are more than three, the smaller ones move to the pre-read as "ratify unless objection." A decision without a recommendation is analysis, not an agenda item.

Pre-read discipline — issued 48 hours ahead; contains all data, gap analysis, and lever costing; the meeting assumes it was read. First slide of the meeting is the decision list, not the demand review.

Output Format

S&OP Readout: [cycle / month]

1. Cycle summary — plan vs. last cycle in three sentences; biggest change since last month.

2. Carry-over actions — last cycle's decisions: done / at risk / missed, with owner.

3. Demand vs. supply gap table — Family | Month | Demand | Supply | Gap (units / % / $) | Class | Proposed lever.

4. Scenario levers — per escalation-class gap: options with cost, consequence, and decision deadline ("expedite window closes [date]").

5. Inventory projection — by family: closing inventory under the recommended plan vs. target, flagged where projection exceeds target by >20% or falls below safety stock.

6. Decisions required (max 3) — Decision | Options & cost | Recommendation | Owner if approved.

7. Pre-read appendix — assumptions, forecast changes, ratify-unless-objection items.

Quality Checks

  • Every gap >5% has a proposed lever with a cost — no naked gaps
  • Gaps expressed in units and dollars, so finance and operations read the same page
  • Exactly 1–3 decisions on the agenda, each with options, costs, and a recommendation
  • Allocation scenarios name which customers/tiers get shorted — no abstract "reduce supply"
  • Carry-over actions from last cycle reviewed before new ones are added
  • Inventory projection reflects the recommended levers, not the unresolved plan
  • Decision deadlines stated where levers expire (expedite windows, build-ahead cutoffs)

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not spend meeting time re-forecasting — forecast disputes go back to the demand review step
  • Do not present a gap without at least one priced lever — that's reporting a problem, not planning
  • Do not bury the decisions at slide 30 — they open the meeting
  • Do not show inventory only in units — value and days-of-supply are what the CFO and planner each need
  • Do not let "allocate" stay abstract — someone specific gets shorted, and the meeting must own that choice
  • Do not issue the pre-read at midnight before the meeting — 48 hours or the meeting becomes the read-through

Version History

  • 54fad50 Current 2026-07-19 12:34

Same Skill Collection

exports/openclaw/360-feedback-template/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/401k-plan-decoder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ab-test-planner/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ab-test-readout/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/accessibility-audit/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/account-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/acquirer-red-team/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ad-copy/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/aeo-optimizer/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agenda-or-cancel/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-design-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-observability-spec/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/agent-spec/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-ethics-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-eval-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-feature-prd/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ai-product-canvas/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/air-quality/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/altitude-shifter/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/ambiguity-resolver/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/analyst-relations-brief/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/announcement-card/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/api-docs-writer/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/api-test-plan/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/api-versioning-strategy/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/apology-letter/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/architecture-decision-record/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/architecture-diagram/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/archive-strategy/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/assumption-bounty/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/async-update-format/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/auto-repair-estimate-decoder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/autopilot-charter/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/benefits-decoder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bid-tender-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-deck-narrative/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-minutes/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/board-pre-read/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bom-cost-review/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bookkeeping-categorization/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/boolean-search-builder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/brag-doc/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/brainstorming/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/brief-builder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/briefing-note/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/budget-builder/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/budget-variance-analysis/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bug-diagnosis/SKILL.md
exports/openclaw/bug-report/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
471c606
Hash
c5ac6152
Indexed
2026-07-19 12:34

- 위키
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-07-29 21:47
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $방문자$