Agent Skillsluongnv89/asm › skill-index-updater

skill-index-updater

GitHub

用于将GitHub技能仓库添加到ASM索引的自动化流程。包含URL解析、克隆、发现SKILL.md文件、审计评估及生成PR,以更新技能目录。

skills/skill-index-updater/SKILL.md luongnv89/asm

Trigger Scenarios

用户请求添加GitHub仓库到技能索引 需要重新索引或更新现有技能库

Install

npx skills add luongnv89/asm --skill skill-index-updater -g -y
More Options

Use without installing

npx skills use luongnv89/asm@skill-index-updater

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add luongnv89/asm --skill skill-index-updater -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add luongnv89/asm --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add luongnv89/asm --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "skill-index-updater",
    "effort": "high",
    "license": "MIT",
    "metadata": {
        "author": "luongnv89",
        "version": "2.0.0"
    },
    "description": "Add GitHub skill repos to the ASM index: clone, audit, eval, regenerate index, rebuild catalog, open PR. Use when given GitHub URLs to onboard. Don't use for authoring (skill-creator), improving (skill-auto-improver), or install (asm install).",
    "allowed-tools": "Bash Read Write Edit Grep Glob WebFetch Agent",
    "compatibility": "Claude Code"
}

Skill Index Updater

You are adding new skill repository sources to the ASM (Agent Skill Manager) curated index. This is the pipeline that powers the skill catalog at https://luongnv.com/asm/ — every repo you add here becomes discoverable and installable by thousands of users.

Example

User: add github.com/anthropics/skills to the index
Skill output:
  Step 1: Parsed 1 URL → anthropics/skills (NEW)
  Step 2: Discovered 14 SKILL.md files
  Step 3: Audit OK on 14/14, eval scores 71–94
  Step 6–8: data/skill-index-resources.json + data/skill-index/anthropics_skills.json updated, catalog rebuilt
  Step 10: PR #312 opened — feat(index): add anthropics/skills (14 skills)

Repo Sync Before Edits (mandatory)

Before modifying any files, pull the latest remote branch:

branch="$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)"
git fetch origin
git pull --rebase origin "$branch"

If the working tree is dirty: stash, sync, then pop. If origin is missing or conflicts occur: stop and ask the user before continuing.

Input

The user provides one or more GitHub repository URLs. These can be in various formats:

  • https://github.com/owner/repo
  • github.com/owner/repo
  • github:owner/repo
  • owner/repo (shorthand)

Normalize all inputs to extract owner and repo.

Pipeline

Follow these steps in order. Each step has a verification check — do not proceed to the next step if verification fails.

You are the orchestrator. Steps 2 and 3 are the heavy ones, and you delegate both: each names the slice of references/ its worker needs and hands that slice over as the worker's Input. In those two steps you never clone a repo, read a SKILL.md, or run asm eval yourself, and you never open the two contract files — the workers do. (Step 7's manual-generation fallback is the one place you may call asm eval directly.)

No Agent tool? Degrade gracefully: read references/discovery-contract.md and references/audit-eval-contract.md yourself, run Steps 2 and 3 inline, in order, and say so in the Step 9 summary. The pipeline is identical; only the context cost changes.

Step 1: Parse and Validate Input URLs

For each URL provided:

  1. Extract owner and repo from the URL
  2. Verify the repository exists by checking https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}
  3. Check if the repo is already in data/skill-index-resources.json — if so, mark it for update instead of add

Output a summary table:

| # | Owner/Repo          | Status   | Notes                    |
|---|---------------------|----------|--------------------------|
| 1 | owner/repo          | NEW      | Will be added            |
| 2 | other/repo          | EXISTS   | Will be re-indexed       |
| 3 | bad/repo            | INVALID  | 404 - repo not found     |

If ALL repos are invalid, stop and tell the user.

Step 2: Discover Skills in Each Repository (workers, one per repo)

Spawn one discovery worker per valid repo, in the same turn so they run concurrently. Each worker's contract:

  • Input: references/discovery-contract.md, plus that repo's owner and repo
  • Output: the fixed JSON in that contract — {owner, repo, tempRoot, clonePath, status, error, skills[]}, one object per repo
  • You do NOT read references/discovery-contract.md yourself; the worker does

Keep every worker's tempRoot and clonePath: Step 3 runs against the clone, Cleanup deletes the tempRoot. There is no shared $TEMP_DIR in your shell — the clones were made in the workers'.

Report how many skills were found per repo. A repo that comes back status: "no-skills" gets flagged — ask the user whether to include it anyway (it might have skills added later). A repo that comes back status: "clone-failed" is skipped with its error reported; the other repos continue.

Step 3: Audit and Evaluate Discovered Skills (workers, one per batch)

Spawn one audit worker per repo — or per batch of ~20 skills for a large repo — again in the same turn. Each worker's contract:

  • Input: references/audit-eval-contract.md, that repo's clonePath from Step 2, and the relPath list for its batch
  • Output: the fixed JSON array in that contract — one object per skill, {relPath, name, auditStatus, notes[], overallScore, grade}
  • You do NOT read references/audit-eval-contract.md yourself, and no worker re-clones: they run against the Step 2 clones

Combined report

Merge the workers' JSON — no re-reading of any skill file — into one table so the user sees quality and safety at a glance:

Repo: owner/repo (N skills discovered)

  skill-name-1        OK     92 / A    name + description present, no security flags
  skill-name-2        WARN   58 / D    missing description
  skill-name-3        FLAG   71 / C    contains shell execution patterns (exec, spawn)

Columns: audit status, eval overallScore / grade, notes.

The current policy is permissive — accept all repos that have at least one valid skill (with name + description). Security warnings and low eval scores are informational only and do not block inclusion; they exist so the reviewer can make an informed call. If a user asks "should we really add this one?", point at the eval categories for specifics. This policy may become stricter in future versions.

Where the eval result ends up

After Step 7 regenerates the index, each skill entry in data/skill-index/{owner}_{repo}.json gains two derived fields:

  • tokenCount: heuristic token estimate for the SKILL.md body
  • evalSummary: { overallScore, grade, categories[], evaluatedAt, evaluatedVersion }

These power the "est. tokens" and "eval score" badges shown in the website catalog, the TUI, and asm inspect. No manual editing required — the ingester populates them as part of preindex.

Step 4: Check for Existing Repos to Update

For repos already in the index (EXISTS status from Step 1):

  1. Compare the existing index file (data/skill-index/{owner}_{repo}.json) against freshly discovered skills
  2. Report what changed:
    • New skills added
    • Skills removed
    • Skills with updated metadata (version, description, etc.)

Ask the user to confirm updates before proceeding.

Step 5: Create Feature Branch

Only proceed if there are legitimate new repos to add or existing repos to update.

git checkout -b feat/index-add-{repo-names}

Use a descriptive branch name. If adding multiple repos, abbreviate: feat/index-add-multiple-repos-{date}.

Step 6: Update skill-index-resources.json

For each NEW repo, add an entry to data/skill-index-resources.json in the repos array:

{
  "source": "github:{owner}/{repo}",
  "url": "https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}",
  "owner": "{owner}",
  "repo": "{repo}",
  "description": "{repo description from GitHub API}",
  "maintainer": "@{owner}",
  "enabled": true
}

Also update the updatedAt timestamp at the top level to the current ISO date.

Step 7: Generate Index Files

For each repo (new and updated), generate the index JSON file. Use the project's built-in preindex script if possible:

cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"
npm run preindex

If npm run preindex fails or takes too long, generate the index file manually by creating data/skill-index/{owner}_{repo}.json with this structure:

{
  "repoUrl": "https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}.git",
  "owner": "{owner}",
  "repo": "{repo}",
  "updatedAt": "{ISO timestamp}",
  "skillCount": N,
  "skills": [
    {
      "name": "skill-name",
      "description": "Skill description from frontmatter",
      "version": "0.0.0",
      "license": "",
      "creator": "",
      "compatibility": "",
      "allowedTools": [],
      "installUrl": "github:{owner}/{repo}:{relative/path/to/skill}",
      "relPath": "relative/path/to/skill",
      "tokenCount": 0,
      "evalSummary": {
        "overallScore": 0,
        "grade": "F",
        "categories": [
          { "id": "structure", "name": "Structure & completeness", "score": 0, "max": 10 }
        ],
        "evaluatedAt": "{ISO timestamp}",
        "evaluatedVersion": "0.0.0"
      }
    }
  ]
}

The installUrl format matters — it's how asm install locates skills. For single-skill repos (SKILL.md at root), omit the path portion. For multi-skill repos, include the relative path to the skill directory.

If you fall back to manual generation, you can populate tokenCount and evalSummary by calling asm eval <clonePath>/<relPath> --json on each skill directory — both values come from that repo's Step 2 worker result, and a root-level skill has an empty relPath, so its path is just clonePath — and lifting the overallScore, grade, categories, evaluatedAt fields into the skill entry. When preindex succeeds, the ingester handles this for you automatically.

Step 8: Rebuild Website Catalog

Run the catalog build script to regenerate website/catalog.json:

npx tsx scripts/build-catalog.ts

Verify the output:

  • website/catalog.json was updated
  • Total skill count increased (or stayed the same for pure updates)
  • No errors in the build output

Step 9: Verify Everything

Run a final check:

  1. data/skill-index-resources.json is valid JSON and contains the new entries
  2. Each new data/skill-index/{owner}_{repo}.json exists and is valid JSON
  3. Each skill entry in those index files has tokenCount (number) and evalSummary (object with overallScore, grade, categories) populated — if any are missing, re-run npm run preindex or fall back to manual population as described in Step 7
  4. website/catalog.json is valid JSON and includes the new skills
  5. git diff --stat shows only the expected files changed

Report a summary to the user:

Added N new repo(s), updated M existing repo(s)
Total new skills indexed: X
Files changed: list of files

Ready to commit and create PR.

Step 10: Commit, Push, and Create PR

Stage and commit with the conventional commit format:

Note: website/catalog.json is gitignored and rebuilt by CI (deploy-website.yml) on merge. Do NOT stage it — only stage the data files.

git add data/skill-index-resources.json data/skill-index/*.json
git commit -m "feat(index): add {owner}/{repo} to curated skill index"

For multiple repos:

git commit -m "feat(index): add N new skill sources

Added:
- owner1/repo1 (X skills)
- owner2/repo2 (Y skills)
"

Push and create a PR:

git push -u origin HEAD
gh pr create --title "feat(index): add {description}" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- Added N new skill repository source(s) to the curated index
- Total new skills: X

### New Repos
| Repo | Skills | Description |
|------|--------|-------------|
| [owner/repo](url) | N | description |

### Audit Summary
All skills passed the lightweight audit. No critical security flags.

## Test Plan
- [ ] `data/skill-index-resources.json` is valid JSON
- [ ] Index files generated in `data/skill-index/`
- [ ] `website/catalog.json` rebuilt successfully
- [ ] CI passes
EOF
)"

Edge Cases & Error Handling

Each row names a condition, the step that owns it, and the required response. When in doubt, surface the issue to the user rather than silently dropping a repo — the reviewer policy is permissive but transparent.

Condition Response
Repo URL is a 404 / private repo Mark INVALID in the Step 1 table and skip; don't abort if other URLs are valid.
Git clone fails The Step 2 worker returns status: clone-failed; skip that repo, report its error, continue with the others.
Repo has zero SKILL.md files The Step 2 worker returns status: no-skills; flag it and ask whether to include anyway (some repos seed empty and add skills later).
Repo has 50+ SKILL.md files Keep going, but warn about runtime — asm eval over many skills is slow.
Repo already in index, unchanged Report EXISTS, no diff and skip index regeneration for that repo.
Repo already in index, breaking changes (skill removed/renamed) Show a diff in Step 4 and require explicit user confirmation before overwriting.
npm run preindex missing or fails Fall back to manual generation per Step 7; do not block the PR.
npx tsx scripts/build-catalog.ts fails Stop in Step 8 — structural; a PR with a broken catalog must not land.
gh not authenticated Prompt gh auth login; do not attempt to push without auth.
gh pr create fails (auth, network, missing remote) Print the committed SHA so the user can push and open the PR manually.
Non-GitHub URL (GitLab, Bitbucket) Reject in Step 1 — this skill only indexes github.com.
URL to a single skill subdirectory (.../tree/main/skills/foo) Treat as the parent repo URL; let the Step 2 worker pick up just that skill.
Agent tool unavailable Read both contract files yourself, run Steps 2 and 3 inline, and say so in the Step 9 summary.

Cleanup

After completion, delete every temp directory Step 2 made. When Step 2 was delegated, use the tempRoot each worker returned verbatim — the clones live in the workers' temp directories, so there is no $TEMP_DIR in your shell to remove. If you ran Step 2 inline because the Agent tool was unavailable, the mktemp -d directory is your own: remove that one instead. Either way, never derive the target from clonePath:

# one per repo, the tempRoot from that repo's Step 2 result
rm -rf "<tempRoot>"

References

  • references/discovery-contract.md — the Step 2 worker's slice: clone, discover, and report every SKILL.md as fixed JSON (including the tempRoot Cleanup deletes)
  • references/audit-eval-contract.md — the Step 3 worker's slice: lightweight audit + asm eval, returned as fixed JSON rows

Version History

  • cf0520d Current 2026-08-27 20:46

    引入分步上下文委派模式,通过skill-creator和auto-improver优化子代理协作,减少主代理上下文负载,提升索引更新效率。

  • 286ea95 2026-07-25 05:02

Dependencies

  • optional github:owner/repo

Same Skill Collection

skills/find-me-skills/SKILL.md
skills/skill-creator/SKILL.md
tests/fixtures/skills/well-formed/SKILL.md
skills/skill-auto-improver/SKILL.md
skills/skill-install-improved/SKILL.md
skills/skill-upstream-pr/SKILL.md
skills/hello-world/SKILL.md
skills/refresh-index/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
d90bb02
Hash
0ad19584
Indexed
2026-07-25 05:02

ホーム - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-08-29 23:34
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $お客様$