Agent Skills › Narcooo/inkos › inkos-story-review

inkos-story-review

GitHub

针对已有文本进行按题材和读者标准的审稿，提供具体问题、严重性及修订建议。强调保留作者风格，仅在用户要求或工作流授权时修改，并引用审查矩阵作为标准依据。

packages/core/skills/inkos-story-review/SKILL.md Narcooo/inkos

Trigger Scenarios

用户需要对章节或手稿进行诊断、评分、对比或审批用户希望获得基于透明标准的修订建议

Install

npx skills add Narcooo/inkos --skill inkos-story-review -g -y

More Options

Non-standard path

npx skills add https://github.com/Narcooo/inkos/tree/master/packages/core/skills/inkos-story-review -g -y

Use without installing

npx skills use Narcooo/inkos@inkos-story-review

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add Narcooo/inkos --skill inkos-story-review -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add Narcooo/inkos --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add Narcooo/inkos --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter

{
    "name": "inkos-story-review",
    "description": "按题材、目标读者和用户标准审稿，展示具体问题并协作修订。Use for chapter or manuscript review with transparent criteria."
}

Story review

Use this skill when the user wants diagnosis, scoring, comparison, approval, or revision advice for existing prose.

First identify the applicable standard from genre, target audience, tone, platform, and explicit user preference. Everyday comedy, literary fiction, romance, mystery, and commercial serials should not share one logic-density threshold.
In an active book, use the auditor for persisted chapters. Show concrete issue descriptions, severity, evidence, and likely reader impact.
A parser or model-format failure is an audit failure, not evidence that the prose is bad and not permission to rewrite it.
Do not revise merely because an audit failed. Revise when the user asks, or when the confirmed workflow authorizes it; report whether the revised artifact was actually applied.
Preserve the user's voice and successful passages. Prefer the smallest scope that resolves the real defect.
Respond in the user's language.

Load references/review-matrix.md for a full review or when standards are disputed.