Skill: Request a Feature

The user wants ButterCut to do something it doesn't do. This sends their idea to the people who build it. It always goes through them — you write it up, they approve it, you send it — so it is not governed by the error-reporting setting: someone who turned error reports off can still ask for multicam support.

Step 1 — Make sure it isn't already there

Check skills, AGENTS.md, libraries/settings.yaml, and CHANGELOG.md first — if ButterCut can already do it, just show them how. If it's a Pro feature and they're on the free edition (ruby lib/buttercut/library.rb edition prints core), tell them it exists in ButterCut Pro instead of sending a request.

Step 2 — Write it up with them

Draft in their words: a one-line title ("Support multicam angles in exports") and a few-sentence request — what they're trying to do and why the current way doesn't get them there. The why is the useful part. Same rule as bug reports: their footage stays out of it — no library, clip, client, or subject names ("a recent two-camera shoot", not "the Hendricks wedding").

Step 3 — Confirm, then send

Read it back, and only when they approve:

ruby lib/buttercut/report.rb send \
  --kind feature \
  --title "Support multicam angles in exports" \
  --narrative "Shoots weddings with two cameras and syncs them by hand in Resolve after exporting. Wants both angles to land on the timeline already lined up."

If they've saved an email (ruby lib/buttercut/report.rb consent shows it), it rides along automatically so the team can reply. If they haven't and they'd want an answer, offer to add error_report_email: to libraries/settings.yaml.

Then confirm it landed, without promising it'll get built:

"Sent — that's with the ButterCut team now. No promises on timing, but they read every one."

Don't show them the JSON, the UUID, or a status code. If the send failed, say so plainly and offer to try again later.

Developer mode. With .buttercut_mode present, report.rb send refuses. Use --dry-run to see what would go.